Do Post-debridement Cultures have a Role in Reduction of Infection in Open Fractures? Report of 166 Cases and Literature Review.

IF 1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Nafaa Ai Kindi, Faisal Ai Abri, Ahmed Yaseen, Rahil Muzaffar, Ahmed Ai Ghaithi, Humaid Ai Farii, Mohammed Ai Mutani, Ayman Al-Amri, Wafa Ai Baluki, Sultan Ai Maskari
{"title":"Do Post-debridement Cultures have a Role in Reduction of Infection in Open Fractures? Report of 166 Cases and Literature Review.","authors":"Nafaa Ai Kindi, Faisal Ai Abri, Ahmed Yaseen, Rahil Muzaffar, Ahmed Ai Ghaithi, Humaid Ai Farii, Mohammed Ai Mutani, Ayman Al-Amri, Wafa Ai Baluki, Sultan Ai Maskari","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the role of post-debridement cultures in the prevention of future infection following open fractures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Academic and tertiary health care, Muscat, Oman.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 166 patients from a cohort study and 539 patients from the literature review with open fractures. There were 640 cumulative patients fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, data on all open fractures were gathered from the electronic health system of a single institution between 2010 and 2019. PubMed and Embase electronic databases were also searched for relevant articles relating to post-surgical debridement culture and its correlation with future infection.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Assessing the benefit, role of post-debridement cultures in the prevention of future infection following open fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combining the results of this retrospective cohort study and previously published data, there were 640 Gustilo-Anderson grades II and III open fractures which had post-debridement screening. Eighty-eight patients (13.8%) developed an infection, out of which 16 had positive post- debridement cultures (18.2%). Only four grew similar organisms at screening and infection stages, two of which had different antibiotic resistance patterns at the infection stage. Seventy-two fractures had negative post-debridement screening swabs (81.8%). Of the 59 (9.2%) fractures with positive screening only four (6.8% of the infected fractures) developed later deep infection. All these 59 cases had culture-guided antibiotic treatment, with or without surgical debridement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the bacterial growth of post-debridement cultures is low, post-debridement screening as part of a comprehensive management protocol may have a role in reducing deep infection in open fractures. This is particularly the case in Gustilo and Anderson type 3 open fractures, the risk of infection is high. The poor association between organisms isolated from screening and those from subsequent deep infection may mean that the later infective organisms have been acquired from a secondary colonisation source after the debridement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Kindi NA, Abri FA, Yaseen A, <i>et al.</i> Do Post-debridement Cultures have a Role in Reduction of Infection in Open Fractures? Report of 166 Cases and Literature Review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(2):94-98.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of post-debridement cultures in the prevention of future infection following open fractures.

Design: Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.

Setting: Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Academic and tertiary health care, Muscat, Oman.

Participants: A total of 166 patients from a cohort study and 539 patients from the literature review with open fractures. There were 640 cumulative patients fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Intervention: Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, data on all open fractures were gathered from the electronic health system of a single institution between 2010 and 2019. PubMed and Embase electronic databases were also searched for relevant articles relating to post-surgical debridement culture and its correlation with future infection.

Main outcome measures: Assessing the benefit, role of post-debridement cultures in the prevention of future infection following open fractures.

Results: Combining the results of this retrospective cohort study and previously published data, there were 640 Gustilo-Anderson grades II and III open fractures which had post-debridement screening. Eighty-eight patients (13.8%) developed an infection, out of which 16 had positive post- debridement cultures (18.2%). Only four grew similar organisms at screening and infection stages, two of which had different antibiotic resistance patterns at the infection stage. Seventy-two fractures had negative post-debridement screening swabs (81.8%). Of the 59 (9.2%) fractures with positive screening only four (6.8% of the infected fractures) developed later deep infection. All these 59 cases had culture-guided antibiotic treatment, with or without surgical debridement.

Conclusion: Although the bacterial growth of post-debridement cultures is low, post-debridement screening as part of a comprehensive management protocol may have a role in reducing deep infection in open fractures. This is particularly the case in Gustilo and Anderson type 3 open fractures, the risk of infection is high. The poor association between organisms isolated from screening and those from subsequent deep infection may mean that the later infective organisms have been acquired from a secondary colonisation source after the debridement.

Level of evidence: III.

How to cite this article: Kindi NA, Abri FA, Yaseen A, et al. Do Post-debridement Cultures have a Role in Reduction of Infection in Open Fractures? Report of 166 Cases and Literature Review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(2):94-98.

清创后培养对减少开放性骨折感染有作用吗?166例病例报告与文献综述。
目的评估清创后培养在预防开放性骨折后未来感染中的作用:设计: 回顾性队列研究和文献综述:地点: 阿曼马斯喀特卡布斯苏丹大学医院骨外科,学术性三级医疗机构:共有 166 名来自队列研究的患者和 539 名来自文献综述的开放性骨折患者。累计有 640 名患者符合纳入和排除标准:采用预先确定的纳入和排除标准,从一家机构的电子健康系统中收集了2010年至2019年期间所有开放性骨折的数据。此外,还在PubMed和Embase电子数据库中搜索了与手术后清创培养及其与未来感染的相关性有关的文章:评估清创后培养在预防开放性骨折后未来感染中的益处和作用:结合这项回顾性队列研究的结果和之前公布的数据,共有640例古斯蒂洛-安德森II级和III级开放性骨折患者进行了清创后筛查。88名患者(13.8%)发生了感染,其中16名患者清创后培养呈阳性(18.2%)。只有四名患者在筛查和感染阶段生长出了相似的菌体,其中两名患者在感染阶段的抗生素耐药性模式不同。72例骨折患者清创后筛查拭子呈阴性(81.8%)。在筛查阳性的 59 例(9.2%)骨折中,只有 4 例(占感染骨折的 6.8%)后来发生了深度感染。这 59 例患者均在培养指导下接受了抗生素治疗,无论是否进行了手术清创:结论:虽然清创后培养的细菌生长率较低,但作为综合治疗方案的一部分,清创后筛查可能有助于减少开放性骨折的深度感染。对于感染风险较高的古斯蒂洛和安德森3型开放性骨折来说,尤其如此。从筛查中分离出的微生物与随后深部感染中分离出的微生物之间的关联性较差,这可能意味着后来的感染性微生物是从清创后的二次定植源获得的:III.如何引用本文:Kindi NA, Abri FA, Yaseen A, et al.166例病例报告与文献综述》。战略创伤肢体重建2024;19(2):94-98。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信