Prehospital Delta Shock Index Predicts Mortality and Need for Life Saving Interventions in Trauma Patients.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Philip W Walker, James F Luther, Stephen R Wisniewski, Joshua B Brown, Ernest E Moore, Martin Schreiber, Bellal Joseph, Chad T Wilson, Brian G Harbrecht, Daniel G Ostermayer, Bryan Cotton, Richard Miller, Mayur Patel, Christian Martin-Gill, Jason L Sperry, Francis X Guyette
{"title":"Prehospital Delta Shock Index Predicts Mortality and Need for Life Saving Interventions in Trauma Patients.","authors":"Philip W Walker, James F Luther, Stephen R Wisniewski, Joshua B Brown, Ernest E Moore, Martin Schreiber, Bellal Joseph, Chad T Wilson, Brian G Harbrecht, Daniel G Ostermayer, Bryan Cotton, Richard Miller, Mayur Patel, Christian Martin-Gill, Jason L Sperry, Francis X Guyette","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2412841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The delta shock index (ΔSI), defined as the change in shock index (SI) over time, is associated with hospital morbidity and mortality, but prehospital studies about ΔSI are limited. We investigate the association of prehospital ΔSI with mortality and resource utilization, hypothesizing that increases in SI among field trauma patients are associated with increased mortality and blood product transfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter, retrospective, observational study from the Linking Investigators in Trauma and Emergency Services (LITES) network. We obtained data from January 2017 to June 2021. We fit logistic regression models to evaluate the association between an increase ΔSI > 0.1 and 28-day mortality and blood product transfusion within 4 hours of emergency department (ED) arrival. We used negative binomial models to evaluate the association between ΔSI > 0.1 and days in hospital, intensive care unit (ICU), and on ventilator (up to 28 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 33,219 prehospital patients. We excluded burn patients and those without documented prehospital or ED heart rate or blood pressure, resulting in 30,511 cases for analysis. In adjusted analysis for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality, patients who had a ΔSI > 0.1 based on initial vital signs were 31% more likely to die (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.41) compared to those patients who had a ΔSI ≤0.1. These patients also spent 16% more days in hospital (adjusted incident rate ratio (AIRR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.14-1.19), 34% more days in ICU (AIRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.28-1.41), and 61% more days on ventilator (ARR 1.61, 95% CI 1.47-1.75). Additionally, patients with a ΔSI > 0.1 had higher odds of receiving blood products (AOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.88-2.12) within 4 hours of ED arrival. Models fit excluding hypotensive patients performed similarly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An increase of greater than 0.1 in the ΔSI was associated with increased 28-day mortality; increased days in hospital, in ICU, and on ventilator; and increased need for blood product transfusion within 4 hours of ED arrival. This association held true for initially normotensive patients. Validation and implementation are needed to incorporate ΔSI into prehospital and ED triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2412841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The delta shock index (ΔSI), defined as the change in shock index (SI) over time, is associated with hospital morbidity and mortality, but prehospital studies about ΔSI are limited. We investigate the association of prehospital ΔSI with mortality and resource utilization, hypothesizing that increases in SI among field trauma patients are associated with increased mortality and blood product transfusion.

Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, observational study from the Linking Investigators in Trauma and Emergency Services (LITES) network. We obtained data from January 2017 to June 2021. We fit logistic regression models to evaluate the association between an increase ΔSI > 0.1 and 28-day mortality and blood product transfusion within 4 hours of emergency department (ED) arrival. We used negative binomial models to evaluate the association between ΔSI > 0.1 and days in hospital, intensive care unit (ICU), and on ventilator (up to 28 days).

Results: We identified 33,219 prehospital patients. We excluded burn patients and those without documented prehospital or ED heart rate or blood pressure, resulting in 30,511 cases for analysis. In adjusted analysis for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality, patients who had a ΔSI > 0.1 based on initial vital signs were 31% more likely to die (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.41) compared to those patients who had a ΔSI ≤0.1. These patients also spent 16% more days in hospital (adjusted incident rate ratio (AIRR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.14-1.19), 34% more days in ICU (AIRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.28-1.41), and 61% more days on ventilator (ARR 1.61, 95% CI 1.47-1.75). Additionally, patients with a ΔSI > 0.1 had higher odds of receiving blood products (AOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.88-2.12) within 4 hours of ED arrival. Models fit excluding hypotensive patients performed similarly.

Conclusions: An increase of greater than 0.1 in the ΔSI was associated with increased 28-day mortality; increased days in hospital, in ICU, and on ventilator; and increased need for blood product transfusion within 4 hours of ED arrival. This association held true for initially normotensive patients. Validation and implementation are needed to incorporate ΔSI into prehospital and ED triage.

院前德尔塔休克指数可预测创伤患者的死亡率和救生干预需求。
目的:休克指数(ΔSI)是指休克指数(SI)随时间的变化,它与住院发病率和死亡率有关,但有关院前ΔSI的研究却很有限。我们调查了院前ΔSI 与死亡率和资源利用的关系,假设现场创伤患者休克指数的增加与死亡率和输血量的增加有关:我们从创伤与急救服务研究者联系(LITES)网络中开展了一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究。我们获得了 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月的数据。我们拟合了逻辑回归模型,以评估ΔSI > 0.1的增加与28天死亡率和急诊科(ED)到达后4小时内输血制品之间的关联。我们使用负二项模型评估了 ΔSI > 0.1 与住院天数、重症监护室(ICU)和呼吸机使用天数(最多 28 天)之间的关系:我们确定了 33,219 名院前患者。我们排除了烧伤患者和没有院前或急诊室心率或血压记录的患者,得出 30,511 个分析病例。在对 28 天死亡率这一主要结果的调整分析中,与 ΔSI ≤0.1 的患者相比,根据初始生命体征得出的 ΔSI > 0.1 的患者死亡几率高出 31%(调整后的几率比 (AOR) 为 1.31,95% CI 为 1.21-1.41)。这些患者的住院天数也增加了 16%(调整后事故率比 (AIRR) 1.16,95% CI 1.14-1.19),在重症监护室的住院天数增加了 34%(调整后事故率比 (AIRR) 1.34,95% CI 1.28-1.41),使用呼吸机的天数增加了 61%(调整后事故率比 (AIRR) 1.61,95% CI 1.47-1.75)。此外,ΔSI > 0.1 的患者在到达急诊室 4 小时内接受血液制品的几率更高(AOR 2.00,95% CI 1.88-2.12)。排除低血压患者的拟合模型表现类似:结论:ΔSI 升高超过 0.1 与 28 天死亡率升高、住院天数、重症监护室天数和呼吸机使用天数增加以及急诊室到达后 4 小时内输血需求增加有关。这种关联在最初血压正常的患者中也是如此。将ΔSI纳入院前和急诊室分诊需要验证和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信