The Financial Impact of a Cosurgeon in Breast Microsurgery.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011791
Robert G DeVito, Benjamin G Ke, Rachel H Park, Scott T Hollenbeck, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix
{"title":"The Financial Impact of a Cosurgeon in Breast Microsurgery.","authors":"Robert G DeVito, Benjamin G Ke, Rachel H Park, Scott T Hollenbeck, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cosurgeon approaches for autologous breast reconstruction have demonstrated improvements in operative efficiency. The health system financial impact, however, warrants further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of consecutive autologous reconstructions was performed between 2017 and 2022. Primary outcome measures consisted of length of stay, operative time, and financial metrics. Cases were stratified by cosurgeon presence, timing, and laterality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 264 cases met inclusion criteria; these consisted of 117 cosurgeon and 147 single-surgeon cases. Cosurgeon cases demonstrated decreased length of stay (2.4 days versus 3.1 days; P < 0.01) and decreased operative time in unilateral (269 minutes versus 370 minutes; P < 0.01) and bilateral (399 minutes versus 582 minutes; P < 0.01) cases. Cosurgeon cases were also associated with decreased total cost ($25,160 versus $31,758; P < 0.01), direct cost ($15,558 versus $19,283; P < 0.01), and indirect cost ($9602 versus $12,475; P < 0.01); decreased total charges ($98,728 versus $120,981; P < 0.01); and increased margin ($1099 versus -$6255; P < 0.01). Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences, albeit at varying magnitudes, in these particular metrics across all levels of reconstruction timing with the inclusion of a cosurgeon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cosurgeon breast microsurgery not only improves operative efficiency, but also translates to improved financial metrics. As the transition is made to value-based care models, this is particularly relevant to health systems offering microsurgical breast reconstruction. Analyses of downstream benefits including optimized patient throughput and surgeon opportunity cost warrant investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"764-775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cosurgeon approaches for autologous breast reconstruction have demonstrated improvements in operative efficiency. The health system financial impact, however, warrants further investigation.

Methods: Retrospective review of consecutive autologous reconstructions was performed between 2017 and 2022. Primary outcome measures consisted of length of stay, operative time, and financial metrics. Cases were stratified by cosurgeon presence, timing, and laterality.

Results: A total of 264 cases met inclusion criteria; these consisted of 117 cosurgeon and 147 single-surgeon cases. Cosurgeon cases demonstrated decreased length of stay (2.4 days versus 3.1 days; P < 0.01) and decreased operative time in unilateral (269 minutes versus 370 minutes; P < 0.01) and bilateral (399 minutes versus 582 minutes; P < 0.01) cases. Cosurgeon cases were also associated with decreased total cost ($25,160 versus $31,758; P < 0.01), direct cost ($15,558 versus $19,283; P < 0.01), and indirect cost ($9602 versus $12,475; P < 0.01); decreased total charges ($98,728 versus $120,981; P < 0.01); and increased margin ($1099 versus -$6255; P < 0.01). Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences, albeit at varying magnitudes, in these particular metrics across all levels of reconstruction timing with the inclusion of a cosurgeon.

Conclusions: Cosurgeon breast microsurgery not only improves operative efficiency, but also translates to improved financial metrics. As the transition is made to value-based care models, this is particularly relevant to health systems offering microsurgical breast reconstruction. Analyses of downstream benefits including optimized patient throughput and surgeon opportunity cost warrant investigation.

乳房显微手术中联合外科医生的财务影响。
简介:自体乳房重建的联合外科医生方法已证明提高了手术效率。然而,对医疗系统财务的影响值得进一步研究:2017-2022年间连续自体乳房重建的回顾性研究。主要结局指标:住院时间(LOS)、手术时间和财务指标。根据联合外科医生的存在、时间和侧位对病例进行分层。结果:264 例病例符合纳入标准;其中联合外科医生病例 117 例,单外科医生病例 147 例。联合外科医生的病例缩短了住院时间(2.4 天对 3.1 天;P < 0.01),缩短了单侧病例的手术时间(269 分钟对 370 分钟;P < 0.01)和双侧病例的手术时间(399 分钟对 582 分钟;P < 0.01)。联合外科医生的病例也与总成本降低(25,160 美元对 31,758 美元;p < 0.01)、直接成本降低(15,558 美元对 19,283 美元;p < 0.01)、间接成本降低(9,602 美元对 12,475 美元;p < 0.01)、总费用降低(98,728 美元对 120,981 美元;p < 0.01)和利润率增加(1,099 美元对 -6,255 美元;p < 0.01)有关。事后分析表明,在有联合外科医生的情况下,所有级别的重建时间在这些特定指标上都有显著差异,尽管差异程度不同:联合外科医生乳房显微手术不仅能提高手术效率,还能改善财务指标。随着我们向以价值为基础的医疗模式过渡,这对提供乳房显微外科重建的医疗系统尤为重要。对下游效益(包括优化的患者吞吐量和外科医生的机会成本)的分析值得研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信