Long-term effects of left atrial appendage isolation in surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation based on lesion set: a multi-centre propensity-score weighted study.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Won Kyung Pyo, Joon Bum Kim, Yang Hyun Cho, Hyoung-Gon Je, Hee Jung Kim, Seung Hyun Lee
{"title":"Long-term effects of left atrial appendage isolation in surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation based on lesion set: a multi-centre propensity-score weighted study.","authors":"Won Kyung Pyo, Joon Bum Kim, Yang Hyun Cho, Hyoung-Gon Je, Hee Jung Kim, Seung Hyun Lee","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This present study aimed to investigate the impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation on adverse clinical outcomes, with a further stratified analysis by biatrial (BA) and left atrial lesion sets, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing surgical ablation (SA) concurrent with mitral valve (MV) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 875 patients (aged 65.1±12.0 years) who underwent SA of AF concomitant to MV surgery, excluding those with mechanical prostheses requiring lifelong anticoagulation, between 2005 and 2017 in five tertiary cardiac centres in South Korea. Of these, 458 had isolated the LAA, whereas the remainder (n=417) had the LAA preserved. Comparative risk of stroke, mortality and AF recurrence was assessed between the groups, considering death as a competing event. Inverse-probability treatment weighting was used for baseline adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the median follow-up of 57.4 months (IQR, 32.5-92.4 months), the adjusted risk of long-term stroke was significantly lower in the patients who underwent LAA isolation compared with those who preserved the LAA (subdistribution HR (SHR), 0.28; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.51; p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the adjusted risk of mortality (HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.27; p=0.429) or AF recurrence (SHR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.08; p=0.291) between LAA isolation and preservation. In the subgroup of patients who underwent BA ablation, LAA isolation was associated with a lower long-term risk of stroke and AF recurrence (SHR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.94; p=0.029) compared with LAA preservation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concomitant LAA isolation during SA of AF in patients undergoing MV surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of long-term stroke, but no survival benefit was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This present study aimed to investigate the impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation on adverse clinical outcomes, with a further stratified analysis by biatrial (BA) and left atrial lesion sets, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing surgical ablation (SA) concurrent with mitral valve (MV) surgery.

Methods: We evaluated 875 patients (aged 65.1±12.0 years) who underwent SA of AF concomitant to MV surgery, excluding those with mechanical prostheses requiring lifelong anticoagulation, between 2005 and 2017 in five tertiary cardiac centres in South Korea. Of these, 458 had isolated the LAA, whereas the remainder (n=417) had the LAA preserved. Comparative risk of stroke, mortality and AF recurrence was assessed between the groups, considering death as a competing event. Inverse-probability treatment weighting was used for baseline adjustment.

Results: During the median follow-up of 57.4 months (IQR, 32.5-92.4 months), the adjusted risk of long-term stroke was significantly lower in the patients who underwent LAA isolation compared with those who preserved the LAA (subdistribution HR (SHR), 0.28; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.51; p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the adjusted risk of mortality (HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.27; p=0.429) or AF recurrence (SHR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.08; p=0.291) between LAA isolation and preservation. In the subgroup of patients who underwent BA ablation, LAA isolation was associated with a lower long-term risk of stroke and AF recurrence (SHR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.94; p=0.029) compared with LAA preservation.

Conclusions: Concomitant LAA isolation during SA of AF in patients undergoing MV surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of long-term stroke, but no survival benefit was observed.

基于病变集的左心房阑尾分离术在心房颤动手术消融中的长期效果:一项多中心倾向分数加权研究。
背景:本研究旨在调查左心房阑尾(LAA)隔离对不良临床结局的影响,并根据二尖瓣手术同时接受手术消融(SA)的房颤(AF)患者的双心房(BA)和左心房病变组进行进一步分层分析:我们对 2005 年至 2017 年期间在韩国 5 家三级心脏中心接受二尖瓣手术同时进行房颤手术消融的 875 例患者(年龄为 65.1±12.0 岁)进行了评估,其中不包括使用机械假体、需要终身抗凝的患者。其中,458 例患者分离了 LAA,其余患者(417 例)保留了 LAA。考虑到死亡是竞争事件,评估了两组间中风、死亡率和房颤复发的比较风险。基线调整采用反概率治疗加权法:结果:在中位随访 57.4 个月(IQR,32.5-92.4 个月)期间,与保留 LAA 的患者相比,接受 LAA 隔离术的患者发生长期中风的调整后风险明显降低(亚分布 HR (SHR),0.28;95% CI 0.15 至 0.51;p 结论:与 SAF 同时进行 LAA 隔离术的患者发生长期中风的调整后风险明显降低(亚分布 HR (SHR),0.28;95% CI 0.15 至 0.51;p):接受中风手术的房颤患者在 SA 期同时进行 LAA 切除与长期中风风险显著降低相关,但未观察到生存获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信