Impact of variability of in silico and in vitro octanol/water partition coefficients of compounds on the input parameters and results of simplified human physiologically based pharmacokinetic models after virtual oral administrations.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Koichiro Adachi, Tsubasa Sasaki, Atsuo Arai, Makiko Shimizu, Hiroshi Yamazaki
{"title":"Impact of variability of in silico and in vitro octanol/water partition coefficients of compounds on the input parameters and results of simplified human physiologically based pharmacokinetic models after virtual oral administrations.","authors":"Koichiro Adachi, Tsubasa Sasaki, Atsuo Arai, Makiko Shimizu, Hiroshi Yamazaki","doi":"10.2131/jts.49.459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The octanol/water partition coefficient, P (logP), is a hydrophobicity index and is one of the determining factors of the pharmacokinetics of chemical compounds. LogP values obtained from in silico software, open chemistry databases, and in vitro liquid chromatography retention factors may vary. Some chemicals (boscalid, etoxazole, and permethrin) have up to four-order-magnitude differences in in silico/in vitro P values. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of logP values of these three compounds, along with bisphenol A, 1,2-dibromobenzene, tetrabromobisphenol A, trazodone, and triazolam, on the input parameters and output plasma/hepatic concentration-time profiles of simple physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. Although the blood-to-plasma concentration ratios (~0.9-0.6) were slightly affected by variations in logP values, logarithmic plasma unbound fraction values and liver-to-plasma partition coefficients (K<sub>p,h</sub>) were, respectively, inversely and linearly correlated with logP values (K<sub>p,h</sub> was stable at ~6.7 for logP > 4). LogP was among the input parameters for previously established machine learning systems; consequently, the resulting logarithmic intrinsic clearance values were correlated with logP values in the range 2-8. However, the bioavailability, absorption rate constants, and volumes of distribution were not affected. PBPK-modeled plasma and hepatic maximum concentrations and areas under the concentration-time curves after virtual oral doses were mostly within ~0.5- to ~2-fold ranges, except for substances with low in vitro logP values, e.g., etoxazole and permethrin. These results suggest that in silico logP values are generally suitable for pharmacokinetic modeling; nevertheless, caution is needed for compounds with low in vitro logP values of ~2.</p>","PeriodicalId":17654,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","volume":"49 10","pages":"459-466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.49.459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The octanol/water partition coefficient, P (logP), is a hydrophobicity index and is one of the determining factors of the pharmacokinetics of chemical compounds. LogP values obtained from in silico software, open chemistry databases, and in vitro liquid chromatography retention factors may vary. Some chemicals (boscalid, etoxazole, and permethrin) have up to four-order-magnitude differences in in silico/in vitro P values. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of logP values of these three compounds, along with bisphenol A, 1,2-dibromobenzene, tetrabromobisphenol A, trazodone, and triazolam, on the input parameters and output plasma/hepatic concentration-time profiles of simple physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. Although the blood-to-plasma concentration ratios (~0.9-0.6) were slightly affected by variations in logP values, logarithmic plasma unbound fraction values and liver-to-plasma partition coefficients (Kp,h) were, respectively, inversely and linearly correlated with logP values (Kp,h was stable at ~6.7 for logP > 4). LogP was among the input parameters for previously established machine learning systems; consequently, the resulting logarithmic intrinsic clearance values were correlated with logP values in the range 2-8. However, the bioavailability, absorption rate constants, and volumes of distribution were not affected. PBPK-modeled plasma and hepatic maximum concentrations and areas under the concentration-time curves after virtual oral doses were mostly within ~0.5- to ~2-fold ranges, except for substances with low in vitro logP values, e.g., etoxazole and permethrin. These results suggest that in silico logP values are generally suitable for pharmacokinetic modeling; nevertheless, caution is needed for compounds with low in vitro logP values of ~2.

化合物的硅学和体外辛醇/水分配系数的变化对虚拟口服给药后基于人体生理的简化药代动力学模型的输入参数和结果的影响。
辛醇/水分配系数 P(logP)是一种疏水指数,是决定化合物药代动力学的因素之一。从硅学软件、开放式化学数据库和体外液相色谱保留因子中获得的 logP 值可能会有所不同。一些化学物质(啶酰菌胺、乙氧唑和氯菊酯)的硅学/体外 P 值相差可达四个数量级。本研究旨在评估这三种化合物以及双酚 A、1,2-二溴苯、四溴双酚 A、曲唑酮和三唑仑的对数值对简单生理药代动力学(PBPK)模型的输入参数和输出血浆/肝脏浓度-时间曲线的影响。虽然血浆浓度比(~0.9-0.6)受 logP 值变化的影响较小,但对数血浆非结合分数值和肝浆分配系数(Kp,h)分别与 logP 值成反比和线性相关(当 logP > 4 时,Kp,h 稳定在~6.7)。logP 是以前建立的机器学习系统的输入参数之一;因此,得出的对数本征清除率值与 logP 值的相关范围为 2-8。不过,生物利用度、吸收率常数和分布容积并未受到影响。除了乙螨唑和氯菊酯等体外对数值较低的物质外,虚拟口服剂量后的 PBPK 模型血浆和肝脏最大浓度以及浓度-时间曲线下面积大多在 ~0.5- ~2 倍范围内。这些结果表明,硅学 logP 值通常适用于药代动力学建模;然而,对于体外 logP 值低至 ~2 的化合物,需要谨慎对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (J. Toxicol. Sci.) is a scientific journal that publishes research about the mechanisms and significance of the toxicity of substances, such as drugs, food additives, food contaminants and environmental pollutants. Papers on the toxicities and effects of extracts and mixtures containing unidentified compounds cannot be accepted as a general rule.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信