The Ambulatory Diabetes Outreach Program (ADOP): Rigorous Evaluation of a Pharmacist and Nurse-Led Care Model.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08970-w
Yilu Dong, Rachel Drury, Jordan Spillane, Mark W Lodes, Annie C Penlesky, Ryan Hanson, Liliana E Pezzin, Siddhartha Singh, Ann B Nattinger
{"title":"The Ambulatory Diabetes Outreach Program (ADOP): Rigorous Evaluation of a Pharmacist and Nurse-Led Care Model.","authors":"Yilu Dong, Rachel Drury, Jordan Spillane, Mark W Lodes, Annie C Penlesky, Ryan Hanson, Liliana E Pezzin, Siddhartha Singh, Ann B Nattinger","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08970-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although several systematic reviews found that ambulatory diabetes mellitus (DM) interventions involving pharmacists generally yielded better outcomes than the ones that did not, existing studies have limitations in rigor and study design.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the intention-to-treat effects of the Ambulatory Diabetes Outreach Program (ADOP) on participants' A1c values and healthcare utilization over a 52-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Difference-in-differences with staggered adoption. Specifically, we employed the Callaway and Sant'Anna's \"group-time average treatment effect\" estimator using not-yet treated as controls adjusting for patient's age, BMI, sex, race, comorbidity, payor, and socio-economic status.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients with at least one ADOP treatment encounter from July 2017 to October 2021, regardless of program completion or length of exposure to the program.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>ADOP, a collaborative population health program led by pharmacists and nurse specialists to provide individualized type 2 DM management and education within a large and diverse health system.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Patients' A1c values and healthcare utilization, including inpatient admission, inpatient days, and numbers of visits to the emergency department, urgent care, and primary care in recent 6 months.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>ADOP participation was associated with an overall average reduction of 1.04 percentage points (95%CI - 1.12, - 0.95) in A1c level. Similar A1c reductions were also observed in the subgroups by sex and race/ethnicity. An average of 2 months were required to reach the overall average effect, which persisted over 4 years. Compared to the respective utilization levels pre-intervention, participants also had average reductions in inpatient admissions by 32.4%, inpatient days by 81.6%, visits to the emergency department by 21.6%, and primary care by 17.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that a collaborative model of pharmacist and nurse-led type 2 DM intervention was effective in improving A1c outcomes and reducing healthcare utilization in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3170-3175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08970-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although several systematic reviews found that ambulatory diabetes mellitus (DM) interventions involving pharmacists generally yielded better outcomes than the ones that did not, existing studies have limitations in rigor and study design.

Objective: To examine the intention-to-treat effects of the Ambulatory Diabetes Outreach Program (ADOP) on participants' A1c values and healthcare utilization over a 52-month follow-up period.

Design: Difference-in-differences with staggered adoption. Specifically, we employed the Callaway and Sant'Anna's "group-time average treatment effect" estimator using not-yet treated as controls adjusting for patient's age, BMI, sex, race, comorbidity, payor, and socio-economic status.

Participants: All patients with at least one ADOP treatment encounter from July 2017 to October 2021, regardless of program completion or length of exposure to the program.

Intervention: ADOP, a collaborative population health program led by pharmacists and nurse specialists to provide individualized type 2 DM management and education within a large and diverse health system.

Main measures: Patients' A1c values and healthcare utilization, including inpatient admission, inpatient days, and numbers of visits to the emergency department, urgent care, and primary care in recent 6 months.

Key results: ADOP participation was associated with an overall average reduction of 1.04 percentage points (95%CI - 1.12, - 0.95) in A1c level. Similar A1c reductions were also observed in the subgroups by sex and race/ethnicity. An average of 2 months were required to reach the overall average effect, which persisted over 4 years. Compared to the respective utilization levels pre-intervention, participants also had average reductions in inpatient admissions by 32.4%, inpatient days by 81.6%, visits to the emergency department by 21.6%, and primary care by 17.9%.

Conclusions: The results suggest that a collaborative model of pharmacist and nurse-led type 2 DM intervention was effective in improving A1c outcomes and reducing healthcare utilization in the long term.

门诊糖尿病推广计划 (ADOP):对药剂师和护士主导的护理模式进行严格评估。
背景:尽管一些系统性综述发现,有药剂师参与的非住院糖尿病(DM)干预措施通常比没有药剂师参与的干预措施产生更好的结果,但现有研究在严谨性和研究设计方面存在局限性:目的:研究非住院糖尿病外展项目(ADOP)在 52 个月随访期内对参与者 A1c 值和医疗保健利用率的意向治疗效果:设计:交错采用差分法。具体来说,我们采用了卡拉韦和桑塔纳的 "组时平均治疗效果 "估计方法,将尚未接受治疗的患者作为对照,并对患者的年龄、体重指数、性别、种族、合并症、付款人和社会经济状况进行调整:所有在 2017 年 7 月至 2021 年 10 月期间接受过至少一次 ADOP 治疗的患者,无论项目是否完成或接触项目的时间长短:ADOP是一项由药剂师和专科护士领导的协作性人群健康计划,旨在一个大型且多样化的医疗系统中提供个性化的2型糖尿病管理和教育:主要测量指标:患者的 A1c 值和医疗保健使用情况,包括最近 6 个月的住院情况、住院天数以及急诊科就诊次数、紧急护理次数和初级保健次数:主要结果:ADOP 的参与使 A1c 水平总体平均降低了 1.04 个百分点(95%CI - 1.12, - 0.95)。在按性别和种族/民族划分的亚组中也观察到了类似的 A1c 下降情况。平均需要 2 个月才能达到总体平均效果,这种效果持续了 4 年。与干预前各自的使用水平相比,参与者的住院人数平均减少了 32.4%,住院天数平均减少了 81.6%,急诊就诊率平均减少了 21.6%,初级保健就诊率平均减少了 17.9%:结果表明,由药剂师和护士主导的 2 型糖尿病干预合作模式在改善 A1c 结果和减少长期医疗使用方面非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信