Kelly-Anne Phillips, Joanne Kotsopoulos, Susan M Domchek, Mary Beth Terry, James A Chamberlain, Julie K Bassett, Amber M Aeilts, Irene L Andrulis, Saundra S Buys, Wanda Cui, Mary B Daly, Andrea F Eisen, William D Foulkes, Michael L Friedlander, Jacek Gronwald, John L Hopper, Esther M John, Beth Y Karlan, Raymond H Kim, Allison W Kurian, Jan Lubinski, Kelly Metcalfe, Katherine L Nathanson, Christian F Singer, Melissa C Southey, Heather Symecko, Nadine Tung, Steven A Narod, Roger L Milne
{"title":"Hormonal Contraception and Breast Cancer Risk for Carriers of Germline Mutations in <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i>.","authors":"Kelly-Anne Phillips, Joanne Kotsopoulos, Susan M Domchek, Mary Beth Terry, James A Chamberlain, Julie K Bassett, Amber M Aeilts, Irene L Andrulis, Saundra S Buys, Wanda Cui, Mary B Daly, Andrea F Eisen, William D Foulkes, Michael L Friedlander, Jacek Gronwald, John L Hopper, Esther M John, Beth Y Karlan, Raymond H Kim, Allison W Kurian, Jan Lubinski, Kelly Metcalfe, Katherine L Nathanson, Christian F Singer, Melissa C Southey, Heather Symecko, Nadine Tung, Steven A Narod, Roger L Milne","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It is uncertain whether, and to what extent, hormonal contraceptives increase breast cancer (BC) risk for germline <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using pooled observational data from four prospective cohort studies, associations between hormonal contraceptive use and BC risk for unaffected female <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers were assessed using Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,882 <i>BRCA1</i> and 1,509 <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers, 53% and 71%, respectively, had ever used hormonal contraceptives for at least 1 year (median cumulative duration of use, 4.8 and 5.7 years, respectively). Overall, 488 <i>BRCA1</i> and 191 <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers developed BC during median follow-up of 5.9 and 5.6 years, respectively. Although for <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers, neither current nor past use of hormonal contraceptives for at least 1 year was statistically significantly associated with BC risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% CI, 0.94 to 2.08], <i>P</i> = .10 for current use; 1.16 [0.80 to 1.69], <i>P</i> = .4, 1.40 [0.99 to 1.97], <i>P</i> = .05, and 1.27 [0.98 to 1.63], <i>P</i> = .07 for past use 1-5, 6-10, and >10 years before, respectively), ever use was associated with increased risk (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.60], <i>P</i> = .02). Furthermore, BC risk increased with longer cumulative duration of use, with an estimated proportional increase in risk of 3% (1%-5%, <i>P</i> = .002) for each additional year of use. For <i>BRCA2</i> mutation carriers, there was no evidence that current or ever use was associated with increased BC risk (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.47], <i>P</i> = .3 and 1.07 [0.73 to 1.57], <i>P</i> = .7, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hormonal contraceptives were associated with increased BC risk for <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers, especially if used for longer durations. Decisions about their use in women with <i>BRCA1</i> mutations should carefully weigh the risks and benefits for each individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"422-431"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: It is uncertain whether, and to what extent, hormonal contraceptives increase breast cancer (BC) risk for germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Methods: Using pooled observational data from four prospective cohort studies, associations between hormonal contraceptive use and BC risk for unaffected female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers were assessed using Cox regression.
Results: Of 3,882 BRCA1 and 1,509 BRCA2 mutation carriers, 53% and 71%, respectively, had ever used hormonal contraceptives for at least 1 year (median cumulative duration of use, 4.8 and 5.7 years, respectively). Overall, 488 BRCA1 and 191 BRCA2 mutation carriers developed BC during median follow-up of 5.9 and 5.6 years, respectively. Although for BRCA1 mutation carriers, neither current nor past use of hormonal contraceptives for at least 1 year was statistically significantly associated with BC risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% CI, 0.94 to 2.08], P = .10 for current use; 1.16 [0.80 to 1.69], P = .4, 1.40 [0.99 to 1.97], P = .05, and 1.27 [0.98 to 1.63], P = .07 for past use 1-5, 6-10, and >10 years before, respectively), ever use was associated with increased risk (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.60], P = .02). Furthermore, BC risk increased with longer cumulative duration of use, with an estimated proportional increase in risk of 3% (1%-5%, P = .002) for each additional year of use. For BRCA2 mutation carriers, there was no evidence that current or ever use was associated with increased BC risk (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.47], P = .3 and 1.07 [0.73 to 1.57], P = .7, respectively).
Conclusion: Hormonal contraceptives were associated with increased BC risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers, especially if used for longer durations. Decisions about their use in women with BRCA1 mutations should carefully weigh the risks and benefits for each individual.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.