Validation of Examination Maneuvers for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in the Telehealth Setting.

Abstract

Background: Telehealth visits (THVs) have made it essential to adopt innovative ways to evaluate patients virtually. This study validates a novel THV approach that uses educational videos and an instructional datasheet, enabling parents to use smartphones to measure their child's scoliosis at home or in telehealth settings.

Methods: We identified a prospective cohort of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) scheduled for follow-up care from March to July 2021. The angle of trunk rotation (ATR) was first measured at home by patients' guardians using instructional video guidance and a smartphone application with internal accelerometer software. The second measurement was made during a THV examination performed by caregivers with supervision by trained associates via a telehealth appointment. Lastly, the clinician measured the child's ATR during an in-person clinic visit. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and interrater reliability were compared between in-person clinic measurements and (1) at-home and (2) THV measurements. Shoulder, lower back, and pelvic asymmetry were observed and quantified at home and virtually, and then were compared with in-person clinic evaluations using kappa values. Surveys were used to evaluate the experience of the patient/caregiver with the at-home and telehealth assessment tools.

Results: Seventy-three patients were included (mean age, 14.1 years; 25% male). There was excellent agreement in the ATR measurements between THVs and in-person visits (ICC = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 0.92). ATR agreement between at-home and in-person visits was also excellent, but slightly diminished (ICC = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.83). Agreement between THV and in-person measurements was significantly higher compared with that between at-home and in-person measurements (p = 0.04). There was poor agreement in lower back asymmetry between THV and in-person assessments (kappa = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.60); however, there was no significant agreement between at-home and in-person assessments (kappa = 0.06; 95% CI = -0.17 to 0.29). Patient/caregiver satisfaction surveys (n = 70) reported a median score of 4 ("good") for comfort with use of the technology, and a score of 3 ("neutral") for equivalence of THV and in-person evaluation.

Conclusions: There was a high level of agreement between telehealth and in-person spine measurements, suggesting that THVs may be reliably used to evaluate AIS, thus improving access to specialized care.

Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.