Evaluating the capability of ChatGPT in predicting drug-drug interactions: Real-world evidence using hospitalized patient data.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ramya Padmavathy Radha Krishnan, Euniss Hinyo Hung, Megan Ashford, Clark Ethan Edillo, Charlise Gardner, Hector Blake Hatrick, Byungjun Kim, Angel Wing Yan Lai, Xinran Li, Yvonne Xinyi Zhao, Jacques Eugene Raubenheimer
{"title":"Evaluating the capability of ChatGPT in predicting drug-drug interactions: Real-world evidence using hospitalized patient data.","authors":"Ramya Padmavathy Radha Krishnan, Euniss Hinyo Hung, Megan Ashford, Clark Ethan Edillo, Charlise Gardner, Hector Blake Hatrick, Byungjun Kim, Angel Wing Yan Lai, Xinran Li, Yvonne Xinyi Zhao, Jacques Eugene Raubenheimer","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) present a significant health burden, compounded by clinician time constraints and poor patient health literacy. We assessed the ability of ChatGPT (generative artificial intelligence-based large language model) to predict DDIs in a real-world setting. Demographics, diagnoses and prescribed medicines for 120 hospitalized patients were input through three standardized prompts to ChatGPT version 3.5 and compared against pharmacist DDI evaluation to estimate diagnostic accuracy. Area under receiver operating characteristic and inter-rater reliability (Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa coefficients) were calculated. ChatGPT's responses differed based on prompt wording style, with higher sensitivity for prompts mentioning 'drug interaction'. Confusion matrices displayed low true positive and high true negative rates, and there was minimal agreement between ChatGPT and pharmacists (Cohen's kappa values 0.077-0.143). Low sensitivity values suggest a lack of success in identifying DDIs by ChatGPT, and further development is required before it can reliably assess potential DDIs in real-world scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) present a significant health burden, compounded by clinician time constraints and poor patient health literacy. We assessed the ability of ChatGPT (generative artificial intelligence-based large language model) to predict DDIs in a real-world setting. Demographics, diagnoses and prescribed medicines for 120 hospitalized patients were input through three standardized prompts to ChatGPT version 3.5 and compared against pharmacist DDI evaluation to estimate diagnostic accuracy. Area under receiver operating characteristic and inter-rater reliability (Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa coefficients) were calculated. ChatGPT's responses differed based on prompt wording style, with higher sensitivity for prompts mentioning 'drug interaction'. Confusion matrices displayed low true positive and high true negative rates, and there was minimal agreement between ChatGPT and pharmacists (Cohen's kappa values 0.077-0.143). Low sensitivity values suggest a lack of success in identifying DDIs by ChatGPT, and further development is required before it can reliably assess potential DDIs in real-world scenarios.

评估 ChatGPT 预测药物间相互作用的能力:使用住院患者数据的实际证据。
药物间相互作用(DDIs)给健康带来了巨大的负担,临床医生的时间限制和患者健康知识的匮乏更是雪上加霜。我们评估了 ChatGPT(基于生成式人工智能的大型语言模型)在真实世界环境中预测 DDI 的能力。我们将 120 名住院患者的人口统计数据、诊断和处方药通过三个标准化提示输入 ChatGPT 3.5 版,并与药剂师的 DDI 评估进行比较,以估计诊断准确性。计算了接受者操作特征下面积和评分者间可靠性(科恩系数和弗莱斯卡帕系数)。ChatGPT 的反应因提示措辞风格而异,对提及 "药物相互作用 "的提示敏感度更高。混淆矩阵显示出较低的真阳性率和较高的真阴性率,而且 ChatGPT 与药剂师之间的一致性极低(科恩卡帕系数 0.077-0.143)。低灵敏度值表明 ChatGPT 在识别 DDI 方面并不成功,需要进一步开发才能可靠地评估真实世界中潜在的 DDI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信