Events preceding death after high-risk surgery analyzed by Global Trigger Tool and reflective-thematic approach.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/aas.14528
Johan Paulander, Rebecca Ahlstrand, Erzsébet Bartha, Lena Nilsson, Klara Rakosi, Gabriel Sandblom, Egidijus Semenas, Sigridur Kalman
{"title":"Events preceding death after high-risk surgery analyzed by Global Trigger Tool and reflective-thematic approach.","authors":"Johan Paulander, Rebecca Ahlstrand, Erzsébet Bartha, Lena Nilsson, Klara Rakosi, Gabriel Sandblom, Egidijus Semenas, Sigridur Kalman","doi":"10.1111/aas.14528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative mortality might be influenced by postoperative care, vigilance, and competence to rescue. This study aims to describe the course of events preceding death in a high-risk surgical cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed hospital records of patients who died within 30 days after surgery in 4 high volume hospitals using (1) reflective narrative thematic approach to identify recurring themes reflecting issues with conduct of care and (2) Global Trigger Tool to describe incidence, timing, and types of adverse events (AEs) leading to harm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative predicted median risk of death in the studied group was 9%/13% according to SORT/P-POSSUM, respectively. Nine recurring themes were identified. Prominent themes were \"consensus concerning aim and/or risk with planned surgery,\" \"level of (intraoperative) competence and monitoring,\" and in the postoperative period \"level of care and vigilance\" on signs of deterioration. We found a total of 303 AEs, with only three patients (5%) having no adverse events. Most common severity category was \"I,\" that is \"contributed to patient's death\" (n = 110, 36% of all AEs). Of these, 60% were classified as preventable or probably preventable. The peak incidence of AEs was seen on the day of index surgery. Most common types of AEs were \"failure of vital functions\" (n = 79, 26%), followed by infections (n = 45, 15%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high predicted risk of death and a peak of adverse events on the day of index surgery were detected. Identified themes reflect lack of documented multi-professional consensus on how to handle prevalent perioperative risk, vigilance, and postoperative level of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1481-1486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative mortality might be influenced by postoperative care, vigilance, and competence to rescue. This study aims to describe the course of events preceding death in a high-risk surgical cohort.

Methods: We analyzed hospital records of patients who died within 30 days after surgery in 4 high volume hospitals using (1) reflective narrative thematic approach to identify recurring themes reflecting issues with conduct of care and (2) Global Trigger Tool to describe incidence, timing, and types of adverse events (AEs) leading to harm.

Results: Preoperative predicted median risk of death in the studied group was 9%/13% according to SORT/P-POSSUM, respectively. Nine recurring themes were identified. Prominent themes were "consensus concerning aim and/or risk with planned surgery," "level of (intraoperative) competence and monitoring," and in the postoperative period "level of care and vigilance" on signs of deterioration. We found a total of 303 AEs, with only three patients (5%) having no adverse events. Most common severity category was "I," that is "contributed to patient's death" (n = 110, 36% of all AEs). Of these, 60% were classified as preventable or probably preventable. The peak incidence of AEs was seen on the day of index surgery. Most common types of AEs were "failure of vital functions" (n = 79, 26%), followed by infections (n = 45, 15%).

Conclusions: A high predicted risk of death and a peak of adverse events on the day of index surgery were detected. Identified themes reflect lack of documented multi-professional consensus on how to handle prevalent perioperative risk, vigilance, and postoperative level of care.

通过全球触发工具和反思主题方法分析高风险手术后死亡前的事件。
背景:术后死亡率可能受术后护理、警惕性和抢救能力的影响。本研究旨在描述高风险手术群死亡前的事件过程:我们分析了 4 家大医院术后 30 天内死亡患者的住院记录,采用(1)反思性叙事主题法来确定反映护理行为问题的重复出现的主题,以及(2)全球触发工具来描述导致伤害的不良事件(AEs)的发生率、时间和类型:结果:根据 SORT/P-POSSUM 预测,研究组术前死亡风险中位数分别为 9%/13%。发现了九个重复出现的主题。其中最突出的主题是 "就计划手术的目的和/或风险达成共识"、"(术中)能力和监控水平 "以及术后对恶化迹象的 "护理和警惕水平"。我们共发现了 303 例不良反应,只有三名患者(5%)未发生不良反应。最常见的严重程度类别是 "I",即 "导致患者死亡"(n = 110,占所有 AE 的 36%)。其中,60%被归类为可预防或可能可预防。指数手术当天是AEs发生率的高峰期。最常见的AE是 "生命功能衰竭"(79例,26%),其次是感染(45例,15%):结论:预测的死亡风险较高,且手术当天是不良事件的高峰期。已确定的主题反映出在如何处理围术期风险、警惕性和术后护理水平方面缺乏有据可查的多专业共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信