Individual variability in neural representations of mind-wandering.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Network Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1162/netn_a_00387
Aaron Kucyi, Nathan Anderson, Tiara Bounyarith, David Braun, Lotus Shareef-Trudeau, Isaac Treves, Rodrigo M Braga, Po-Jang Hsieh, Shao-Min Hung
{"title":"Individual variability in neural representations of mind-wandering.","authors":"Aaron Kucyi, Nathan Anderson, Tiara Bounyarith, David Braun, Lotus Shareef-Trudeau, Isaac Treves, Rodrigo M Braga, Po-Jang Hsieh, Shao-Min Hung","doi":"10.1162/netn_a_00387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mind-wandering is a frequent, daily mental activity, experienced in unique ways in each person. Yet neuroimaging evidence relating mind-wandering to brain activity, for example in the default mode network (DMN), has relied on population- rather than individual-based inferences owing to limited within-person sampling. Here, three densely sampled individuals each reported hundreds of mind-wandering episodes while undergoing multi-session functional magnetic resonance imaging. We found reliable associations between mind-wandering and DMN activation when estimating brain networks within individuals using precision functional mapping. However, the timing of spontaneous DMN activity relative to subjective reports, and the networks beyond DMN that were activated and deactivated during mind-wandering, were distinct across individuals. Connectome-based predictive modeling further revealed idiosyncratic, whole-brain functional connectivity patterns that consistently predicted mind-wandering within individuals but did not fully generalize across individuals. Predictive models of mind-wandering and attention that were derived from larger-scale neuroimaging datasets largely failed when applied to densely sampled individuals, further highlighting the need for personalized models. Our work offers novel evidence for both conserved and variable neural representations of self-reported mind-wandering in different individuals. The previously unrecognized interindividual variations reported here underscore the broader scientific value and potential clinical utility of idiographic approaches to brain-experience associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48520,"journal":{"name":"Network Neuroscience","volume":"8 3","pages":"808-836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Network Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mind-wandering is a frequent, daily mental activity, experienced in unique ways in each person. Yet neuroimaging evidence relating mind-wandering to brain activity, for example in the default mode network (DMN), has relied on population- rather than individual-based inferences owing to limited within-person sampling. Here, three densely sampled individuals each reported hundreds of mind-wandering episodes while undergoing multi-session functional magnetic resonance imaging. We found reliable associations between mind-wandering and DMN activation when estimating brain networks within individuals using precision functional mapping. However, the timing of spontaneous DMN activity relative to subjective reports, and the networks beyond DMN that were activated and deactivated during mind-wandering, were distinct across individuals. Connectome-based predictive modeling further revealed idiosyncratic, whole-brain functional connectivity patterns that consistently predicted mind-wandering within individuals but did not fully generalize across individuals. Predictive models of mind-wandering and attention that were derived from larger-scale neuroimaging datasets largely failed when applied to densely sampled individuals, further highlighting the need for personalized models. Our work offers novel evidence for both conserved and variable neural representations of self-reported mind-wandering in different individuals. The previously unrecognized interindividual variations reported here underscore the broader scientific value and potential clinical utility of idiographic approaches to brain-experience associations.

思维游走神经表征的个体差异性
思维游走是一种频繁的日常心理活动,每个人都会以独特的方式经历这种活动。然而,由于人内取样有限,有关思维游走与大脑活动(如默认模式网络(DMN))的神经影像学证据一直依赖于群体而非个体推断。在本文中,三个取样密集的个体在接受多期功能磁共振成像检查时,每人都报告了数百次思维游离事件。在使用精确功能图谱估算个体内部大脑网络时,我们发现思维游走与DMN激活之间存在可靠的关联。然而,相对于主观报告,DMN自发活动的时间,以及在思维游走过程中DMN以外被激活和失活的网络,在不同个体之间是不同的。基于连接组的预测模型进一步揭示了特异性的全脑功能连接模式,这种模式可以持续预测个体的思维游走,但不能完全概括不同个体的情况。从更大规模的神经成像数据集推导出的思维游走和注意力预测模型在应用于密集采样的个体时大多失败,这进一步凸显了对个性化模型的需求。我们的研究提供了新的证据,证明不同个体自我报告的思维游走既有保守的神经表征,也有可变的神经表征。这里报告的以前未被发现的个体间差异强调了大脑体验关联的特异性方法的广泛科学价值和潜在临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Network Neuroscience
Network Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信