Celiac disease gut microbiome studies in the third millennium: reviewing the findings and gaps of available literature.

IF 2.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Frontiers in medical technology Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2024.1413637
Vanessa C C Luz, Sónia Gonçalves Pereira
{"title":"Celiac disease gut microbiome studies in the third millennium: reviewing the findings and gaps of available literature.","authors":"Vanessa C C Luz, Sónia Gonçalves Pereira","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2024.1413637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Celiac disease is an autoimmune enteropathy caused by the ingestion of minute amounts of gluten in a subset of genetically predisposed individuals. Its onset occurs at different ages and with variable symptoms. The gut microbiome may contribute to this variability. This review aims to provide an overview of the available research on celiac disease gut microbiome and identify the knowledge gap that could guide future studies. Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), four electronic databases were searched for literature from January 2000 to July 2023 addressing celiac disease gut microbiome characterization using next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches. From the 489 publications retrieved, 48 publications were selected and analyzed, focusing on sample characterization (patients, controls, and tissues) and methodologies used for NGS microbiome analysis and characterization. The majority of the selected publications regarded children and adults, and four were randomized clinical trials. The number of participants per study greatly varied and was typically low. Feces were the most frequently tested sample matrix, and duodenal samples were analyzed in one-third of the studies. Incomplete and diverse information on the methodological approaches and gut microbiome results was broadly observed. While similar trends regarding the relative abundance of some phyla, such as Pseudomonadota (former Proteobacteria), were detected in some studies, others contradicted those results. The observed high variability of technical approaches and possibly low power and sample sizes may prevent reaching a consensus on celiac disease gut microbiome composition. Standardization of research protocols to allow reproducibility and comparability is required, as interdisciplinary collaborations to further data analysis, interpretation, and, more importantly, health outcome prediction or improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2024.1413637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Celiac disease is an autoimmune enteropathy caused by the ingestion of minute amounts of gluten in a subset of genetically predisposed individuals. Its onset occurs at different ages and with variable symptoms. The gut microbiome may contribute to this variability. This review aims to provide an overview of the available research on celiac disease gut microbiome and identify the knowledge gap that could guide future studies. Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), four electronic databases were searched for literature from January 2000 to July 2023 addressing celiac disease gut microbiome characterization using next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches. From the 489 publications retrieved, 48 publications were selected and analyzed, focusing on sample characterization (patients, controls, and tissues) and methodologies used for NGS microbiome analysis and characterization. The majority of the selected publications regarded children and adults, and four were randomized clinical trials. The number of participants per study greatly varied and was typically low. Feces were the most frequently tested sample matrix, and duodenal samples were analyzed in one-third of the studies. Incomplete and diverse information on the methodological approaches and gut microbiome results was broadly observed. While similar trends regarding the relative abundance of some phyla, such as Pseudomonadota (former Proteobacteria), were detected in some studies, others contradicted those results. The observed high variability of technical approaches and possibly low power and sample sizes may prevent reaching a consensus on celiac disease gut microbiome composition. Standardization of research protocols to allow reproducibility and comparability is required, as interdisciplinary collaborations to further data analysis, interpretation, and, more importantly, health outcome prediction or improvement.

第三个千年的乳糜泻肠道微生物组研究:回顾现有文献的发现和不足。
乳糜泻是一种自身免疫性肠病,是由一部分有遗传倾向的人摄入微量麸质引起的。其发病年龄不同,症状也各异。肠道微生物组可能是造成这种差异的原因之一。本综述旨在概述有关乳糜泻肠道微生物组的现有研究,并找出可指导未来研究的知识缺口。按照《系统综述和荟萃分析扩展范围综述的首选报告项目》(PRISMA-ScR)的指导原则,检索了四个电子数据库中 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月使用下一代测序(NGS)方法描述乳糜泻肠道微生物组特征的文献。从检索到的 489 篇文献中,选择并分析了 48 篇文献,重点关注样本特征(患者、对照组和组织)以及用于 NGS 微生物组分析和特征描述的方法。所选出版物大多涉及儿童和成人,其中四篇是随机临床试验。每项研究的参与者人数差异很大,通常较少。粪便是最常检测的样本基质,三分之一的研究分析了十二指肠样本。关于方法和肠道微生物组结果的信息既不完整也多种多样。一些研究发现了假单胞菌(原变形菌)等某些菌门相对丰度的相似趋势,而另一些研究则与这些结果相矛盾。所观察到的技术方法的高度差异性以及可能存在的低功率和样本量问题可能会阻碍就乳糜泻肠道微生物组的组成达成共识。需要对研究方案进行标准化,以实现可重复性和可比性,同时开展跨学科合作,以进一步分析、解释数据,更重要的是预测或改善健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信