The potential role of intracavernosal injection of platelet-rich plasma for treating patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction: A GRADE-Assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Niwanda Yogiswara, Fikri Rizaldi, Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi
{"title":"The potential role of intracavernosal injection of platelet-rich plasma for treating patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction: A GRADE-Assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Niwanda Yogiswara, Fikri Rizaldi, Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.12687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown positive effects on enhancing erectile function in animal studies. Human clinical trials are limited and provide contradictory results. This review aims to conduct a meta-analysis of the available Randomized controlled trials (RCT) to assess the efficacy of PRP in males with ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was carried out following the Cochrane Handbook of Intervention and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023441655).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of three RCTs were included in the analysis for a total of 221 patients with mild to moderate ED. The patients receiving PRP reported significantly better improvement of IIEFEF score during 1,3- and 6-months follow-up compared to the placebo group (mean difference [MD] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 3.83, p < 0.01; MD 2.11, 95%CI 0.13 to 4.09, p = 0.04; MD 2.99, 95%CI 1.79 to 4.19, p < 0.01). The pooled analysis indicated that attainment of minimally clinical important difference (MCID) was significantly higher in patients receiving PRP compared to the placebo group during one and 6-month follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 5.51, 95%CI 1.2 to 254, p = 0.03; OR 5.64, 95%CI 2.05 to 15.55, p < 0.01; respectively). Encouragingly, no major AEs were reported in all three trials in the PRP and placebo groups (p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the potential role of PRP in providing short-term improvement of erectile function parameters for up to 6 months in mild to moderate ED patients. Future RCTs with longer-duration follow-ups and more standardized treatment protocols are necessary to gain sufficient details on PRP's long-term effectiveness and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown positive effects on enhancing erectile function in animal studies. Human clinical trials are limited and provide contradictory results. This review aims to conduct a meta-analysis of the available Randomized controlled trials (RCT) to assess the efficacy of PRP in males with ED.

Methods: A systematic review was carried out following the Cochrane Handbook of Intervention and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023441655).

Results: A total of three RCTs were included in the analysis for a total of 221 patients with mild to moderate ED. The patients receiving PRP reported significantly better improvement of IIEFEF score during 1,3- and 6-months follow-up compared to the placebo group (mean difference [MD] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 3.83, p < 0.01; MD 2.11, 95%CI 0.13 to 4.09, p = 0.04; MD 2.99, 95%CI 1.79 to 4.19, p < 0.01). The pooled analysis indicated that attainment of minimally clinical important difference (MCID) was significantly higher in patients receiving PRP compared to the placebo group during one and 6-month follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 5.51, 95%CI 1.2 to 254, p = 0.03; OR 5.64, 95%CI 2.05 to 15.55, p < 0.01; respectively). Encouragingly, no major AEs were reported in all three trials in the PRP and placebo groups (p = 0.99).

Conclusions: This review highlights the potential role of PRP in providing short-term improvement of erectile function parameters for up to 6 months in mild to moderate ED patients. Future RCTs with longer-duration follow-ups and more standardized treatment protocols are necessary to gain sufficient details on PRP's long-term effectiveness and safety.

海绵体内注射富血小板血浆治疗轻中度勃起功能障碍患者的潜在作用:经 GRADE 评估的随机对照试验系统综述和荟萃分析。
介绍:富血小板血浆(PRP)在动物实验中显示出增强勃起功能的积极作用。人类临床试验有限,且结果相互矛盾。本综述旨在对现有的随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,以评估 PRP 对男性 ED 的疗效:方法:按照《科克伦干预手册》和《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)进行了系统综述,并在PROSPERO(CRD42023441655)上进行了注册:共有三项 RCT 纳入分析,共涉及 221 名轻度至中度 ED 患者。与安慰剂组相比,接受PRP治疗的患者在1、3和6个月随访期间的IIEFEF评分改善明显(平均差[MD]2.66,95%置信区间[CI]1.48至3.83,P < 0.01;MD 2.11,95%CI 0.13至4.09,P = 0.04;MD 2.99,95%CI 1.79至4.19,P < 0.01)。汇总分析表明,与安慰剂组相比,接受PRP治疗的患者在1个月和6个月随访期间达到最小临床意义差异(MCID)的比例明显更高(几率比[OR]分别为5.51,95%CI为1.2至254,p = 0.03;OR分别为5.64,95%CI为2.05至15.55,p < 0.01)。令人欣慰的是,在所有三项试验中,PRP组和安慰剂组均未出现重大不良反应(p = 0.99):本综述强调了 PRP 在短期内改善轻度至中度 ED 患者勃起功能参数长达 6 个月的潜在作用。未来有必要进行随访时间更长、治疗方案更标准化的 RCT 研究,以充分了解 PRP 的长期有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信