Surgical management of obstructing ureteral stones during pregnancy: A systematic review of different techniques.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Catarina Laranjo Tinoco, Maria João Oliveira, Ana Sofia Araújo, Andreia Cardoso, Carlos Oliveira, Paulo Mota, João Pimentel Torres
{"title":"Surgical management of obstructing ureteral stones during pregnancy: A systematic review of different techniques.","authors":"Catarina Laranjo Tinoco, Maria João Oliveira, Ana Sofia Araújo, Andreia Cardoso, Carlos Oliveira, Paulo Mota, João Pimentel Torres","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.12153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renal colic is the most common non-obstetric cause of abdominal pain during pregnancy and is associated with a higher risk of complications in these women. When invasive treatment is required, options are temporary drainage with ureteral stent (JJ) or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN), or immediate definitive treatment with ureteroscopy (URS). Our goal was to review the safety and efficacy of these procedures in treating urolithiasis during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adhering to the PRISMA checklist guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for articles on the efficacy and complications of the three procedures in pregnant women. The quality of evidence and risk of bias were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and the Institute of Health Economics tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 45 articles, totaling 3424 interventions in pregnant women - 2188 URS, 719 JJ, and 517 PCN. URS was the most assessed procedure, with stone-free rates comparable to the non-pregnant patients. The most frequent complications were lower urinary symptoms and infections independently of the intervention. Obstetric complications for all interventions included 167 cases of preterm labor, resulting in 24 premature births. No statistically significant differences in post-operative complications were reported between the procedures in the few comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the absence of high-quality studies, current evidence suggests that URS, JJ, and PCN are all safe and effective during pregnancy. As most patients submitted to temporary drainage require a second procedure post-delivery, primary URS appears more efficient. Therefore, it is the preferred option unless there are indications for temporary drainage.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Renal colic is the most common non-obstetric cause of abdominal pain during pregnancy and is associated with a higher risk of complications in these women. When invasive treatment is required, options are temporary drainage with ureteral stent (JJ) or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN), or immediate definitive treatment with ureteroscopy (URS). Our goal was to review the safety and efficacy of these procedures in treating urolithiasis during pregnancy.

Methods: Adhering to the PRISMA checklist guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for articles on the efficacy and complications of the three procedures in pregnant women. The quality of evidence and risk of bias were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and the Institute of Health Economics tools.

Results: We included 45 articles, totaling 3424 interventions in pregnant women - 2188 URS, 719 JJ, and 517 PCN. URS was the most assessed procedure, with stone-free rates comparable to the non-pregnant patients. The most frequent complications were lower urinary symptoms and infections independently of the intervention. Obstetric complications for all interventions included 167 cases of preterm labor, resulting in 24 premature births. No statistically significant differences in post-operative complications were reported between the procedures in the few comparative studies.

Conclusions: Despite the absence of high-quality studies, current evidence suggests that URS, JJ, and PCN are all safe and effective during pregnancy. As most patients submitted to temporary drainage require a second procedure post-delivery, primary URS appears more efficient. Therefore, it is the preferred option unless there are indications for temporary drainage.

妊娠期输尿管结石梗阻的手术治疗:不同技术的系统回顾。
引言肾绞痛是导致妊娠期腹痛的最常见的非产科原因,对这些妇女来说,并发症的风险较高。当需要进行侵入性治疗时,可选择使用输尿管支架(JJ)或经皮肾造瘘术(PCN)进行临时引流,或立即使用输尿管镜(URS)进行明确治疗。我们的目标是回顾这些手术治疗妊娠期尿路结石的安全性和有效性:根据 PRISMA 核对表指南,我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库中检索了有关孕妇接受这三种手术的疗效和并发症的文章。我们使用批判性评估技能计划和卫生经济学研究所工具对证据质量和偏倚风险进行了评估:我们收录了 45 篇文章,共对孕妇进行了 3424 次干预--2188 次 URS、719 次 JJ 和 517 次 PCN。尿路造影术是评估最多的手术,无结石率与非孕妇相当。最常见的并发症是下尿路症状和感染,与介入治疗无关。所有介入手术的产科并发症包括167例早产,导致24例早产。在为数不多的比较研究中,不同手术的术后并发症在统计学上没有明显差异:尽管缺乏高质量的研究,但目前的证据表明,URS、JJ 和 PCN 在孕期都是安全有效的。由于大多数接受临时引流术的患者需要在分娩后进行第二次手术,因此一级 URS 似乎更有效。因此,除非有临时引流的指征,否则首选 URS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信