Redefining kidney transplantation procedure among adult lupus nephritis: Expedient review approach and meta-analysis from the last couple of decades.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Syah Mirsya Warli, Andi Raga Ginting, Naufal Nandita Firsty, Adrian Joshua Velaro, Stephani Clarissa Sembiring, Dewi Masyithah Darlan, Zaimah Zulkarnaini Tala
{"title":"Redefining kidney transplantation procedure among adult lupus nephritis: Expedient review approach and meta-analysis from the last couple of decades.","authors":"Syah Mirsya Warli, Andi Raga Ginting, Naufal Nandita Firsty, Adrian Joshua Velaro, Stephani Clarissa Sembiring, Dewi Masyithah Darlan, Zaimah Zulkarnaini Tala","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.12627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The actual prognostic impact of prior lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis on end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients remains questionable, especially in relation to outcomes of kidney transplantation (KTx) We aim to determine the survival of the graft and recipient after the KTx procedure among patients with ESKD due to LN in comparison to non-LN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis included retrospective studies from the last two decades, focusing on the KTx's outcomes among ESKD due to LN in comparison to non-LN. We establish the graft/recipient survival rate at different follow-up intervals as the primary outcome, and acute graft rejection and pooled graft failure rate as secondary outcomes. All analyses were performed with the random-effect model (REM) and were presented as odd ratio (OR; within 95% confidence interval (CI)). The protocol of this study was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023394310.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,299 KTx (368 LN patients) from 10 studies with >10 years of follow-up were thoroughly reviewed. All checkpoints (at 1-, 5-, 10, and 15-year post-KTx) on graft survival rate demonstrated comparable outcomes in either LN or non-LN (e.g., at 10-year follow up (OR, 1.08 [0.40, 2.91]; p = 0.88). Similar findings at all checkpoints for recipient survival rate were also observed without statistically significant difference between LN and non-LN arm (e.g., at 10-year checkpoint; OR, 0.99 [0.68, 1.46]; p = 0.98). Both of our secondary analyses also presented insignificant differences (p = 0.70 and = 0.16, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested that prognosis of ESKD due to complicated LN is equal compared to ESKD associated with non-LN etiologies, suggesting the impact of LN as the inducing cause of ESKD on KTx outcome is relatively neglectable.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The actual prognostic impact of prior lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis on end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients remains questionable, especially in relation to outcomes of kidney transplantation (KTx) We aim to determine the survival of the graft and recipient after the KTx procedure among patients with ESKD due to LN in comparison to non-LN.

Methods: This meta-analysis included retrospective studies from the last two decades, focusing on the KTx's outcomes among ESKD due to LN in comparison to non-LN. We establish the graft/recipient survival rate at different follow-up intervals as the primary outcome, and acute graft rejection and pooled graft failure rate as secondary outcomes. All analyses were performed with the random-effect model (REM) and were presented as odd ratio (OR; within 95% confidence interval (CI)). The protocol of this study was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023394310.

Results: A total of 1,299 KTx (368 LN patients) from 10 studies with >10 years of follow-up were thoroughly reviewed. All checkpoints (at 1-, 5-, 10, and 15-year post-KTx) on graft survival rate demonstrated comparable outcomes in either LN or non-LN (e.g., at 10-year follow up (OR, 1.08 [0.40, 2.91]; p = 0.88). Similar findings at all checkpoints for recipient survival rate were also observed without statistically significant difference between LN and non-LN arm (e.g., at 10-year checkpoint; OR, 0.99 [0.68, 1.46]; p = 0.98). Both of our secondary analyses also presented insignificant differences (p = 0.70 and = 0.16, respectively).

Conclusions: Our findings suggested that prognosis of ESKD due to complicated LN is equal compared to ESKD associated with non-LN etiologies, suggesting the impact of LN as the inducing cause of ESKD on KTx outcome is relatively neglectable.

重新定义成人狼疮性肾炎的肾移植手术:过去几十年的快速回顾方法和荟萃分析。
背景:狼疮性肾炎(LN)对终末期肾病(ESKD)患者预后的实际影响仍然存在疑问,尤其是对肾移植(KTx)结果的影响。我们的目的是确定LN导致的ESKD患者与非LN导致的ESKD患者进行KTx手术后移植物和受体的存活率:这项荟萃分析纳入了过去二十年的回顾性研究,重点关注 LN ESKD 患者与非 LN ESKD 患者的 KTx 结果对比。我们将不同随访间隔期的移植物/受者存活率作为主要结果,将急性移植物排斥反应和合并移植物失败率作为次要结果。所有分析均采用随机效应模型(REM),并以奇数比(OR,95% 置信区间内)表示。本研究方案已在 PROSPERO 注册:CRD42023394310:对随访时间超过 10 年的 10 项研究中的 1299 例 KTx(368 例 LN 患者)进行了全面审查。关于移植物存活率的所有检查点(KTx 术后 1、5、10 和 15 年)均显示 LN 或非 LN 患者的结果相当(例如,10 年随访(OR,1.08 [0.40,2.91];P = 0.88)。在所有检查点也观察到了类似的受体存活率结果,LN臂和非LN臂之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异(例如,在10年检查点;OR,0.99 [0.68,1.46];P = 0.98)。我们的两项辅助分析也显示出不显著的差异(p = 0.70 和 = 0.16):我们的研究结果表明,与非LN病因相关的ESKD相比,复杂LN导致的ESKD预后相同,这表明LN作为ESKD的诱因对KTx结果的影响相对较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信