Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio Combined with SYNTAX Scores I/II in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Small-Sample, Single-Center Study.
Shuyi Zhang, Ming Wang, Qian Gan, Xinrong Zhai, Yang Chen, Shaofeng Guan, Xinxin Xu, Jiasheng Wen, Xinkai Qu, Wenzheng Han
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio Combined with SYNTAX Scores I/II in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Small-Sample, Single-Center Study.","authors":"Shuyi Zhang, Ming Wang, Qian Gan, Xinrong Zhai, Yang Chen, Shaofeng Guan, Xinxin Xu, Jiasheng Wen, Xinkai Qu, Wenzheng Han","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2509329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A fractional flow reserve (FFR)-fixed-SYNTAX score could decrease the number of high-risk patients. This study explored the prognostic value of non-invasive quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-fixed-SYNTAX I/II scores in multivessel disease patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, small-sample, observational study. Multivessel coronary disease patients were enrolled and finished a 1-year follow-up. SYNTAX scores I/II and functional SYNTAX scores I/II based on QFR (cut-off value of 0.85) were calculated for all patients. The composite occurrence of cardiac deaths, any myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization were analyzed using a different score system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 160 patients were stratified into risk groups based on a different scoring system. FSS (functional SYNTAX score) and FSSII (functional SYNTAX score II) reduce the radio of high-risk major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), transforming the patients from high-risk to medium- and low-risk. Furthermore, FSSII (hazard ratio (HR): 1.069, 95% CI: 1.025-1.115, <i>p =</i> 0.002) showed a better relationship with MACEs than the other score systems. After recalculating SSII, the survival-free ratio stratified by FSSII decreased from 38.46% to 27.27% in the high-risk group and increased from 84.09% to 86.05% in the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FSS or FSSII could decrease the number of high-risk patients compared to SYNTAX score (SS) and FSS. SYNTAX II score (SSII) and FSSII showed a better predictive ability than other scoring systems for under-risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 9","pages":"329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A fractional flow reserve (FFR)-fixed-SYNTAX score could decrease the number of high-risk patients. This study explored the prognostic value of non-invasive quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-fixed-SYNTAX I/II scores in multivessel disease patients.
Methods: This was a single-center, small-sample, observational study. Multivessel coronary disease patients were enrolled and finished a 1-year follow-up. SYNTAX scores I/II and functional SYNTAX scores I/II based on QFR (cut-off value of 0.85) were calculated for all patients. The composite occurrence of cardiac deaths, any myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization were analyzed using a different score system.
Results: A total of 160 patients were stratified into risk groups based on a different scoring system. FSS (functional SYNTAX score) and FSSII (functional SYNTAX score II) reduce the radio of high-risk major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), transforming the patients from high-risk to medium- and low-risk. Furthermore, FSSII (hazard ratio (HR): 1.069, 95% CI: 1.025-1.115, p = 0.002) showed a better relationship with MACEs than the other score systems. After recalculating SSII, the survival-free ratio stratified by FSSII decreased from 38.46% to 27.27% in the high-risk group and increased from 84.09% to 86.05% in the low-risk group.
Conclusions: FSS or FSSII could decrease the number of high-risk patients compared to SYNTAX score (SS) and FSS. SYNTAX II score (SSII) and FSSII showed a better predictive ability than other scoring systems for under-risk stratification.
期刊介绍:
RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.