Planetary care is good cancer care

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nikki Burdett, Ben Dunne
{"title":"Planetary care is good cancer care","authors":"Nikki Burdett,&nbsp;Ben Dunne","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><span>To the Editor:</span> Recently, more than 400 Australian doctors (including both authors) signed an open letter published in <i>The Australian</i>,<span><sup>1</sup></span> calling on our federal government to protect the health of Australians by banning any new fossil fuel projects.</p><p>From the perspective of clinicians treating cancer, there are many reasons that this is an urgent request. Aside from their contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, fossil fuel projects increase air pollution and particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 μm in diameter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), which are both risk factors for lung cancer.<span><sup>2</sup></span> This includes <i>EGFR</i>-mutated lung cancer, which is classically associated with never smoking or light smoking.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Disturbingly, air pollution is linked to increased mortality in paediatric and young adults with cancer.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Air and wastewater pollution generated by fossil fuel projects contains multiple carcinogens. This includes benzene, which is associated with haematological malignancies; additional studies demonstrate a positive association between residential proximity to petrochemical facilities and leukaemia.<span><sup>5-8</sup></span></p><p>While new projects have been recently approved across the nation, the Beetaloo Basin and Middle Arm project are the most notable, with echoes of the distressing Louisiana petrochemical corridor (United States), which is also referred to as “cancer alley” due to residents’ disproportionate exposure to toxic industrial by-products.<span><sup>8, 9</sup></span> Australia risks creating its own “sacrifice zone”, harming the health of its people and contributing irrevocably to the climate crisis.</p><p>Natural disasters and extreme weather events amplified by climate change also disrupt access to care, which is critical for patients undergoing cancer treatment and translates to poorer outcomes.</p><p>Aside from cancer, there are various other risks, including asthma, cardiovascular disease and pre-term birth. These are avoidable and unacceptable illnesses, which can lead to deaths.</p><p>When the evidence that smoking harmed health was overwhelming, doctors championed this message and took action. In 2024, we — as physicians — need to convey the message that banning new fossil fuel projects is not a political ask, rather is essential to protect the health of our nation.</p><p>Both authors are active members of Doctors for the Environment Australia, and signed the open letter, which is referenced in this manuscript.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 8","pages":"447"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52455","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To the Editor: Recently, more than 400 Australian doctors (including both authors) signed an open letter published in The Australian,1 calling on our federal government to protect the health of Australians by banning any new fossil fuel projects.

From the perspective of clinicians treating cancer, there are many reasons that this is an urgent request. Aside from their contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, fossil fuel projects increase air pollution and particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5), which are both risk factors for lung cancer.2 This includes EGFR-mutated lung cancer, which is classically associated with never smoking or light smoking.3 Disturbingly, air pollution is linked to increased mortality in paediatric and young adults with cancer.4 Air and wastewater pollution generated by fossil fuel projects contains multiple carcinogens. This includes benzene, which is associated with haematological malignancies; additional studies demonstrate a positive association between residential proximity to petrochemical facilities and leukaemia.5-8

While new projects have been recently approved across the nation, the Beetaloo Basin and Middle Arm project are the most notable, with echoes of the distressing Louisiana petrochemical corridor (United States), which is also referred to as “cancer alley” due to residents’ disproportionate exposure to toxic industrial by-products.8, 9 Australia risks creating its own “sacrifice zone”, harming the health of its people and contributing irrevocably to the climate crisis.

Natural disasters and extreme weather events amplified by climate change also disrupt access to care, which is critical for patients undergoing cancer treatment and translates to poorer outcomes.

Aside from cancer, there are various other risks, including asthma, cardiovascular disease and pre-term birth. These are avoidable and unacceptable illnesses, which can lead to deaths.

When the evidence that smoking harmed health was overwhelming, doctors championed this message and took action. In 2024, we — as physicians — need to convey the message that banning new fossil fuel projects is not a political ask, rather is essential to protect the health of our nation.

Both authors are active members of Doctors for the Environment Australia, and signed the open letter, which is referenced in this manuscript.

行星护理就是良好的癌症护理。
致编辑最近,400 多名澳大利亚医生(包括两位作者)签署了一封发表在《澳大利亚人报》1 上的公开信,呼吁联邦政府禁止任何新的化石燃料项目,从而保护澳大利亚人的健康。除了造成温室气体排放外,化石燃料项目还增加了空气污染和直径小于或等于 2.5 μm 的颗粒物(PM2.5),而这两种物质都是肺癌的危险因素。2 其中包括表皮生长因子受体突变肺癌,这种肺癌通常与从不吸烟或少量吸烟有关。4 化石燃料项目产生的空气和废水污染含有多种致癌物质,其中包括与血液恶性肿瘤有关的苯;其他研究表明,居住地靠近石化设施与白血病之间存在正相关关系。5-8 虽然最近全国各地都批准了新项目,但最引人注目的是 Beetaloo Basin 和 Middle Arm 项目,这与令人痛心的路易斯安那石化走廊(美国)如出一辙,由于居民过多接触有毒工业副产品,该走廊也被称为 "癌症巷"、9 澳大利亚有可能建立自己的 "牺牲区",损害本国人民的健康,并不可逆转地加剧气候危机。因气候变化而加剧的自然灾害和极端天气事件也会扰乱人们获得医疗服务的途径,而这对于接受癌症治疗的患者来说至关重要,并会导致治疗效果变差。当吸烟有害健康的证据确凿时,医生们倡导这一信息并采取行动。在2024年,我们--作为医生--需要传达这样一个信息:禁止新的化石燃料项目不是一个政治要求,而是保护我们国家健康的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信