Multicenter analysis of the efficacy of early cholecystectomy and preoperative cholecystostomy for severe acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study of data from the multi-institutional database of the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tomoyuki Abe, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Shintaro Kuroda, Michinori Hamaoka, Hiroaki Mashima, Takashi Onoe, Naruhiko Honmyo, Koichi Oishi, Hideki Ohdan
{"title":"Multicenter analysis of the efficacy of early cholecystectomy and preoperative cholecystostomy for severe acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study of data from the multi-institutional database of the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology.","authors":"Tomoyuki Abe, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Shintaro Kuroda, Michinori Hamaoka, Hiroaki Mashima, Takashi Onoe, Naruhiko Honmyo, Koichi Oishi, Hideki Ohdan","doi":"10.1186/s12876-024-03420-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe acute cholecystitis (AC) is a challenging disease because it comprises coexisting systemic infections that lead to vital organ dysfunction. This study evaluated the optimal surgical timing and efficacy of preoperative percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for patients with severe AC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 142 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for severe AC between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively collected from the multi-institutional database of the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology. Patients were divided into the early cholecystectomy (EC) group (within 72 h of symptom onset) and delayed cholecystectomy (DC) group. They were also subdivided into the upfront cholecystectomy group and preoperative PC before cholecystectomy group. The diagnosis and severity of AC were graded according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018. Clinicopathological variables and outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and Charlson comorbidity index between the EC and DC groups were observed. Preoperative drainage was more commonly performed for the DC group than for the EC group. Local severe AC features were more commonly detected in the DC group than in the EC group. The postoperative outcomes of the EC and DC groups were comparable. Compared to the PC before cholecystectomy group, the upfront cholecystectomy group included more patients with ASA physical status ≥ 3 and more patients who used oral warfarin. Warfarin usage and cardiovascular dysfunction rates of the PC after cholecystectomy group were higher than those of the upfront cholecystectomy group. PC was associated with significantly less intraoperative bleeding and shorter hospital stays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who can tolerate general anesthesia are good candidates for EC. Patients who use warfarin and those with cardiovascular dysfunction are considered to be at high risk for postoperative complications; therefore, to prevent AC recurrence during the waiting period, PC before cholecystectomy during the same admission is more appropriate than upfront cholecystectomy for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03420-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe acute cholecystitis (AC) is a challenging disease because it comprises coexisting systemic infections that lead to vital organ dysfunction. This study evaluated the optimal surgical timing and efficacy of preoperative percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for patients with severe AC.

Methods: Data of 142 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for severe AC between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively collected from the multi-institutional database of the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology. Patients were divided into the early cholecystectomy (EC) group (within 72 h of symptom onset) and delayed cholecystectomy (DC) group. They were also subdivided into the upfront cholecystectomy group and preoperative PC before cholecystectomy group. The diagnosis and severity of AC were graded according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018. Clinicopathological variables and outcomes were compared.

Results: No significant differences in age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and Charlson comorbidity index between the EC and DC groups were observed. Preoperative drainage was more commonly performed for the DC group than for the EC group. Local severe AC features were more commonly detected in the DC group than in the EC group. The postoperative outcomes of the EC and DC groups were comparable. Compared to the PC before cholecystectomy group, the upfront cholecystectomy group included more patients with ASA physical status ≥ 3 and more patients who used oral warfarin. Warfarin usage and cardiovascular dysfunction rates of the PC after cholecystectomy group were higher than those of the upfront cholecystectomy group. PC was associated with significantly less intraoperative bleeding and shorter hospital stays.

Conclusions: Patients who can tolerate general anesthesia are good candidates for EC. Patients who use warfarin and those with cardiovascular dysfunction are considered to be at high risk for postoperative complications; therefore, to prevent AC recurrence during the waiting period, PC before cholecystectomy during the same admission is more appropriate than upfront cholecystectomy for these patients.

重症急性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术和术前胆囊造口术疗效的多中心分析:广岛临床肿瘤学外科研究小组多机构数据库数据的回顾性研究。
背景:重症急性胆囊炎(AC)是一种具有挑战性的疾病,因为它包括并存的全身感染,导致重要器官功能障碍。本研究评估了严重急性胆囊炎患者术前经皮胆囊造口术(PC)的最佳手术时机和疗效:方法:从广岛临床肿瘤学外科研究小组的多机构数据库中回顾性收集了 2011 年至 2021 年间因重症 AC 而接受胆囊切除术的 142 例患者的数据。患者被分为早期胆囊切除术(EC)组(症状出现 72 小时内)和延迟胆囊切除术(DC)组。他们还被细分为前期胆囊切除术组和胆囊切除术前 PC 组。AC的诊断和严重程度根据《东京指南2018》进行分级。比较临床病理变量和结果:EC组和DC组在年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级和Charlson合并症指数方面无明显差异。与 EC 组相比,DC 组更常进行术前引流。与 EC 组相比,DC 组更常发现局部严重 AC 特征。EC组和DC组的术后效果相当。与胆囊切除术前PC组相比,胆囊切除术前PC组中ASA体能状态≥3级的患者更多,使用口服华法林的患者也更多。胆囊切除术后PC组的华法林使用率和心血管功能障碍发生率高于前期胆囊切除术组。PC与术中出血量明显减少和住院时间明显缩短有关:结论:能够耐受全身麻醉的患者是接受胆囊切除术的理想人选。结论:能耐受全身麻醉的患者适合接受胆囊切除术,使用华法林的患者和心血管功能不全的患者被认为是术后并发症的高危人群;因此,为防止在等待期间胆囊切除术复发,对这些患者来说,在同一入院时间内进行胆囊切除术前PC比先行胆囊切除术更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信