Intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy spares musculoskeletal structures in regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer: a dosimetric comparison.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jessica F Burlile, Satomi Shiraishi, Heather J Gunn, Jennifer L Bradt, Haley M Kroeplin, Karen G Lang, Jenna K Cimmiyotti, Nicolas Depauw, Connie Y Chang, Kevin M Brom, Cassandra L Sonnicksen, Anhmai Vu, Rachel B Jimenez, Kimberly S Corbin
{"title":"Intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy spares musculoskeletal structures in regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer: a dosimetric comparison.","authors":"Jessica F Burlile, Satomi Shiraishi, Heather J Gunn, Jennifer L Bradt, Haley M Kroeplin, Karen G Lang, Jenna K Cimmiyotti, Nicolas Depauw, Connie Y Chang, Kevin M Brom, Cassandra L Sonnicksen, Anhmai Vu, Rachel B Jimenez, Kimberly S Corbin","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for breast cancer delivers radiation in proximity to the shoulder and torso, and radiation exposure may contribute to long-term upper extremity and postural morbidity. To date, no studies have assessed the differential dosimetric impact of proton versus photon radiation on shoulder and torso anatomy. This study examined clinically relevant musculoskeletal (MSK) structures and assessed the dose delivered with each modality.</p><p><strong>Patients/material and methods: </strong>Ten MSK structures were contoured on IMPT (intensity-modulated proton therapy) and VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) plans for 30 patients receiving RNI. Relevant dose metrics were compared for each of the structures. Intensity-modulated proton therapy dose was calculated using the relative biological effective value of 1.1. Hypo-fractionated plans were scaled to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) using an alpha/beta ratio of four. Wilcoxon signed rank sum tests compared doses. Select three-dimensional and optimised VMAT plans were also informally compared.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>Each of the 10 structures received a statistically significantly lower dose with the use of IMPT compared with VMAT. Differences were greatest for posterior structures, including the trapezius, latissimus dorsi and glenohumeral joint. Mean absolute differences were as great as 23 Gy (supraspinatus D5cc) and up to 30-fold dose reductions were observed (deltoid D50cc). An average 3.7-fold relative dose reduction existed across all structures. Measures of low/intermediate dose (V15Gy and D50cc) showed the largest differences. Intensity-modulated proton therapy results in statistically lower radiation exposure to relevant shoulder and torso anatomy compared to photon radiation for patients requiring RNI. Prospective study is needed to correlate functional outcomes with radiation dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"63 ","pages":"755-762"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for breast cancer delivers radiation in proximity to the shoulder and torso, and radiation exposure may contribute to long-term upper extremity and postural morbidity. To date, no studies have assessed the differential dosimetric impact of proton versus photon radiation on shoulder and torso anatomy. This study examined clinically relevant musculoskeletal (MSK) structures and assessed the dose delivered with each modality.

Patients/material and methods: Ten MSK structures were contoured on IMPT (intensity-modulated proton therapy) and VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) plans for 30 patients receiving RNI. Relevant dose metrics were compared for each of the structures. Intensity-modulated proton therapy dose was calculated using the relative biological effective value of 1.1. Hypo-fractionated plans were scaled to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) using an alpha/beta ratio of four. Wilcoxon signed rank sum tests compared doses. Select three-dimensional and optimised VMAT plans were also informally compared.

Results and interpretation: Each of the 10 structures received a statistically significantly lower dose with the use of IMPT compared with VMAT. Differences were greatest for posterior structures, including the trapezius, latissimus dorsi and glenohumeral joint. Mean absolute differences were as great as 23 Gy (supraspinatus D5cc) and up to 30-fold dose reductions were observed (deltoid D50cc). An average 3.7-fold relative dose reduction existed across all structures. Measures of low/intermediate dose (V15Gy and D50cc) showed the largest differences. Intensity-modulated proton therapy results in statistically lower radiation exposure to relevant shoulder and torso anatomy compared to photon radiation for patients requiring RNI. Prospective study is needed to correlate functional outcomes with radiation dose.

乳腺癌区域结节照射中的调强质子放疗可保护肌肉骨骼结构:剂量学比较。
背景和目的:乳腺癌区域结节照射(RNI)会在肩部和躯干附近产生辐射,而辐射照射可能会导致上肢和姿势的长期发病。迄今为止,还没有研究评估过质子与光子辐射对肩部和躯干解剖结构的不同剂量学影响。本研究检查了临床上相关的肌肉骨骼(MSK)结构,并评估了每种方式的辐射剂量:在 IMPT(强度调制质子疗法)和 VMAT(容积调制弧形疗法)计划上对 30 名接受 RNI 的患者的 10 个 MSK 结构进行了轮廓分析。对每个结构的相关剂量指标进行了比较。强度调制质子治疗剂量使用相对生物有效值 1.1 计算。低分次计划采用α/β比值为4的方法,按2 Gy分次等效剂量(EQD2)进行缩放。Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验比较了剂量。还对选定的三维和优化 VMAT 计划进行了非正式比较:与 VMAT 相比,使用 IMPT 时 10 个结构中每个结构的剂量在统计学上都明显较低。后部结构的差异最大,包括斜方肌、背阔肌和盂肱关节。平均绝对差异高达 23 Gy(冈上肌 D5cc),剂量减少高达 30 倍(三角肌 D50cc)。所有结构的相对剂量平均减少 3.7 倍。低/中剂量(V15Gy 和 D50cc)的测量结果显示出最大的差异。与光子辐射相比,强度调制质子疗法对需要进行 RNI 的患者的相关肩部和躯干解剖结构的辐射量在统计学上更低。需要进行前瞻性研究,将功能结果与辐射剂量联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信