Relationship Between Dysbiotic Wound Microbiota and Critical Colonization: Involvement of FOXP3-Positive Cells in Rats.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004092
Mao Kunimitsu, Takeo Minematsu, Sofoklis Koudounas, Hiromi Sanada, Gojiro Nakagami
{"title":"Relationship Between Dysbiotic Wound Microbiota and Critical Colonization: Involvement of FOXP3-Positive Cells in Rats.","authors":"Mao Kunimitsu, Takeo Minematsu, Sofoklis Koudounas, Hiromi Sanada, Gojiro Nakagami","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Detection of critical colonization is gaining importance in wound management, but its pathophysiology remains unclear. We previously clarified that a dysbiotic wound microbiota differing from skin commensal microbiota may be involved in critical colonization and that such wounds contain fewer Forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3)-positive cells in the tissue. However, it is not clear whether FOXP3-positive cells contribute to the development of critical colonization. Here, we examined whether inhibition of FOXP3-positive cell could induce critical colonization when the commensal microbiota was present in the wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sprague-Dawley rats were administered FK506 or vehicle to inhibit differentiation into FOXP3-positive cells. Full-thickness wounds were made on the dorsal skin and inoculated with bacterial solution (dysbiosis group) or Luria-Bertani medium (commensal group). A bacterial solution was prepared by anaerobically culturing bacteria from the skin of donor rats on an artificial dermis in Luria-Bertani medium for 72 hours. Tissues were collected on day 4 postwounding for histological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After microbiota transplantation, excessive inflammation occurred in the FK506 + commensal group. In contrast, wounds with transplanted dysbiotic microbiota showed the same level of neutrophil infiltration, regardless of FK506 administration. Furthermore, the wound area was larger in the FK506 + commensal group than in the vehicle + commensal group on day 4 postwounding ( P = 0.01). This area was also significantly larger in both the vehicle + dysbiosis ( P = 0.01) and FK506 + dysbiosis groups ( P = 0.03) than in the vehicle + commensal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has shown that dysbiosis may be at least related to developing critical colonization, and the results suggest that FOXP3-positive cells are involved in this process. Our study may contribute to establishing new interventions that prevent critical colonization by correcting wound microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Detection of critical colonization is gaining importance in wound management, but its pathophysiology remains unclear. We previously clarified that a dysbiotic wound microbiota differing from skin commensal microbiota may be involved in critical colonization and that such wounds contain fewer Forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3)-positive cells in the tissue. However, it is not clear whether FOXP3-positive cells contribute to the development of critical colonization. Here, we examined whether inhibition of FOXP3-positive cell could induce critical colonization when the commensal microbiota was present in the wounds.

Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats were administered FK506 or vehicle to inhibit differentiation into FOXP3-positive cells. Full-thickness wounds were made on the dorsal skin and inoculated with bacterial solution (dysbiosis group) or Luria-Bertani medium (commensal group). A bacterial solution was prepared by anaerobically culturing bacteria from the skin of donor rats on an artificial dermis in Luria-Bertani medium for 72 hours. Tissues were collected on day 4 postwounding for histological evaluation.

Results: After microbiota transplantation, excessive inflammation occurred in the FK506 + commensal group. In contrast, wounds with transplanted dysbiotic microbiota showed the same level of neutrophil infiltration, regardless of FK506 administration. Furthermore, the wound area was larger in the FK506 + commensal group than in the vehicle + commensal group on day 4 postwounding ( P = 0.01). This area was also significantly larger in both the vehicle + dysbiosis ( P = 0.01) and FK506 + dysbiosis groups ( P = 0.03) than in the vehicle + commensal group.

Conclusions: This study has shown that dysbiosis may be at least related to developing critical colonization, and the results suggest that FOXP3-positive cells are involved in this process. Our study may contribute to establishing new interventions that prevent critical colonization by correcting wound microbiota.

伤口微生物群失衡与临界定植之间的关系:大鼠 FOXP3 阳性细胞的参与。
导言:临界定植的检测在伤口管理中越来越重要,但其病理生理学仍不清楚。我们以前曾明确指出,伤口微生物群与皮肤共生微生物群不同,可能与临界定植有关,而且这种伤口组织中叉头盒蛋白 P3(FOXP3)阳性细胞较少。然而,目前还不清楚 FOXP3 阳性细胞是否有助于临界定植的发展。在此,我们研究了当伤口中存在共生微生物群时,抑制 FOXP3 阳性细胞是否能诱导临界定植:方法:给 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠注射 FK506 或药物来抑制 FOXP3 阳性细胞的分化。在背侧皮肤上制作全厚伤口,并接种细菌溶液(菌群失调组)或 Luria-Bertani 培养基(共生组)。细菌溶液是在 Luria-Bertani 培养基中将供体大鼠皮肤上的细菌厌氧培养 72 小时后制成的。在伤口愈合后第 4 天采集组织进行组织学评估:结果:移植微生物群后,FK506 + 共生菌组出现过度炎症。相比之下,移植了菌群失调微生物群的伤口显示出相同水平的中性粒细胞浸润,与 FK506 给药无关。此外,在伤口愈合后第 4 天,FK506 + 共生菌组的伤口面积大于载体 + 共生菌组(P = 0.01)。此外,在伤口愈合后第 4 天,FK506 + 菌群失调组的伤口面积也明显大于车辆 + 共生菌组(P = 0.01)和 FK506 + 菌群失调组(P = 0.03):本研究表明,菌群失调至少可能与发展临界定植有关,研究结果表明,FOXP3 阳性细胞参与了这一过程。我们的研究可能有助于制定新的干预措施,通过纠正伤口微生物群来预防临界定植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信