Surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or chemoradiation plus immunotherapy: Treatment strategies for nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Fang He , Mo Chen , Qi-jun Yao , Zhi-min Liu , Yandong Zhao , Fengyun Pei , Jian Zheng , Yuan-hong Gao , Jun Huang
{"title":"Surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or chemoradiation plus immunotherapy: Treatment strategies for nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma","authors":"Fang He ,&nbsp;Mo Chen ,&nbsp;Qi-jun Yao ,&nbsp;Zhi-min Liu ,&nbsp;Yandong Zhao ,&nbsp;Fengyun Pei ,&nbsp;Jian Zheng ,&nbsp;Yuan-hong Gao ,&nbsp;Jun Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current standard of care for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, about a third of patients may experience treatment failure. Recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a novel strategy for metastatic ASCC patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of surgery, CRT alone, and CRT with immunotherapy (CRT-I) in 100 nonmetastatic ASCC patients, treated from April 2012 through May 2023, by determining survival outcomes and acute adverse events. The median (range) follow-up was 30.7 (7.6 to 134.9) months. The study cohort 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 80.7 %, 62.2 %, 71.1 %, and 67.6 %, respectively. The Surgery group had significantly lower rates than the CRT and CRT-I groups for 3-year PFS (33.1% vs. 65.2% vs. 92.9 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), DMFS (46.7% vs. 74.6% vs. 92.9 %, <em>P</em> = 0.002) and LRFS (37.0% vs. 73.3% vs. 92.9 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), respectively. All patients receiving CRT-I were alive at last follow-up. Of 100 patients, 26 (26.0 %) experienced severe (≥ grade 3) acute toxicity. Of 24 patients receiving CRT-I, 8 (33.3 %) had severe acute toxicity. Using immunohistochemistry, peritumoural stromal infiltration by CD8+ <em>T</em> cells was significantly higher after CRT-I compared to before CRT-I and to after CRT alone. The addition of immunotherapy to CRT may be an effective first-line treatment option with favourable survival outcomes and acceptable toxicity for patients with ASCC. A prospective, randomized trial assessing the efficacy of CRT combined with a PD-1 inhibitor in patients with locally advanced ASCC is in progress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48975,"journal":{"name":"Translational Oncology","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 102133"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324002602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current standard of care for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, about a third of patients may experience treatment failure. Recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a novel strategy for metastatic ASCC patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of surgery, CRT alone, and CRT with immunotherapy (CRT-I) in 100 nonmetastatic ASCC patients, treated from April 2012 through May 2023, by determining survival outcomes and acute adverse events. The median (range) follow-up was 30.7 (7.6 to 134.9) months. The study cohort 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 80.7 %, 62.2 %, 71.1 %, and 67.6 %, respectively. The Surgery group had significantly lower rates than the CRT and CRT-I groups for 3-year PFS (33.1% vs. 65.2% vs. 92.9 %, P < 0.001), DMFS (46.7% vs. 74.6% vs. 92.9 %, P = 0.002) and LRFS (37.0% vs. 73.3% vs. 92.9 %, P < 0.001), respectively. All patients receiving CRT-I were alive at last follow-up. Of 100 patients, 26 (26.0 %) experienced severe (≥ grade 3) acute toxicity. Of 24 patients receiving CRT-I, 8 (33.3 %) had severe acute toxicity. Using immunohistochemistry, peritumoural stromal infiltration by CD8+ T cells was significantly higher after CRT-I compared to before CRT-I and to after CRT alone. The addition of immunotherapy to CRT may be an effective first-line treatment option with favourable survival outcomes and acceptable toxicity for patients with ASCC. A prospective, randomized trial assessing the efficacy of CRT combined with a PD-1 inhibitor in patients with locally advanced ASCC is in progress.
手术、化放疗或化放疗加免疫疗法:非转移性肛门鳞状细胞癌的治疗策略
目前治疗肛门鳞状细胞癌(ASCC)的标准是明确的同步化学放疗(CRT)。然而,约三分之一的患者可能会出现治疗失败。最近,免疫疗法成为治疗转移性肛门鳞状细胞癌患者的一种新策略。我们评估了自2012年4月至2023年5月期间接受治疗的100例非转移性ASCC患者的生存结果和急性不良事件,评估了手术、单纯CRT和CRT联合免疫疗法(CRT-I)的疗效和安全性。随访时间的中位数(范围)为30.7(7.6-134.9)个月。研究队列的3年总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率(PFS)、无远处转移生存率(DMFS)和无局部复发生存率(LRFS)分别为80.7%、62.2%、71.1%和67.6%。手术组的 3 年 PFS(33.1% vs. 65.2% vs. 92.9%,P = 0.001)、DMFS(46.7% vs. 74.6% vs. 92.9%,P = 0.002)和 LRFS(37.0% vs. 73.3% vs. 92.9%,P = 0.001)分别明显低于 CRT 组和 CRT-I 组。所有接受CRT-I治疗的患者在最后一次随访时均存活。在100名患者中,26人(26.0%)出现严重(≥3级)急性毒性。在接受CRT-I治疗的24名患者中,8人(33.3%)出现严重急性毒性。通过免疫组化,CRT-I 后 CD8+ T 细胞的瘤周基质浸润明显高于 CRT-I 前和单纯 CRT 后。对ASCC患者来说,在CRT基础上增加免疫疗法可能是一种有效的一线治疗方案,不仅生存率高,毒性也可接受。一项评估CRT联合PD-1抑制剂对局部晚期ASCC患者疗效的前瞻性随机试验正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
314
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Translational Oncology publishes the results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of oncology patients. Translational Oncology will publish laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer. Peer reviewed manuscript types include Original Reports, Reviews and Editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信