A cooperative learning intervention for improving a simulation-based paediatric nursing course: A quasi-experimental study

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Bao-Huan Yang , Chia-Ying Chung , Yuh-Shiow Li , Chueh-Fen Lu
{"title":"A cooperative learning intervention for improving a simulation-based paediatric nursing course: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Bao-Huan Yang ,&nbsp;Chia-Ying Chung ,&nbsp;Yuh-Shiow Li ,&nbsp;Chueh-Fen Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to examine if a cooperative intervention improved outcomes for a simulation-based paediatric nursing course.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fostering cooperative learning can enhance student engagement and improve learning. Simulation-based courses provide nursing students an opportunity to practice and hone nursing skills when hands-on experiences are limited. Providing instruction in cooperative learning could improve course outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A quasi-experimental study with pre-test/post-test assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Third-year nursing students enrolled in an 18-week paediatric simulation-based nursing course were purposively recruited (N = 110). One class (n = 55) received a researcher-developed cooperative learning program, which encouraged student support during class activities and simulations. The second class (control) received usual class instruction and simulations. The efficacy of the intervention was assessed by comparing mean scores at class enrolment (pre-test) and completion (post-test) for self-perceived problem-solving attitude, cooperative learning experience and knowledge of paediatric nursing. Paired t-tests compared pre-test with post-test scores for the two groups. ANCOVA examined differences in mean scores between groups. Correlations between differences in mean pre-test and post-test subscale scores for problem-solving attitude and cooperative learning experience were also examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no significant difference in age or gender between groups. Mean post-test scores on the final exam were significantly higher for students who received the intervention (85.26, 95 % CI 84.19, 86.33) compared with controls (83.61, 95 % CI 82.52, 84.69; F = 4.63, p = 0.034). There were no significant differences in total scores for problem-solving attitude or cooperative learning experience or between groups. For the intervention group, two problem solving subscales were correlated with two cooperative learning subscales: problem solving confidence with learning motivation, respectively (r = 0.302, p = 0.025) and personal control with classroom learning, respectively (r = 0.389, p = 0.003). For the control group, approach-avoidance problem solving was negatively correlated with cooperative learning efficacy (r = −0.343, p = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with the control group, nursing students who received the cooperative learning intervention had higher scores for knowledge of paediatric nursing, as well as learning motivation and attitude and problem-solving confidence, suggesting that the researcher-designed intervention facilitated simulation-based learning as well as confidence in problem-solving. Nurse educators could easily integrate the intervention into simulation-based paediatric nursing courses to enhance students' problem-solving abilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 104149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to examine if a cooperative intervention improved outcomes for a simulation-based paediatric nursing course.

Background

Fostering cooperative learning can enhance student engagement and improve learning. Simulation-based courses provide nursing students an opportunity to practice and hone nursing skills when hands-on experiences are limited. Providing instruction in cooperative learning could improve course outcomes.

Design

A quasi-experimental study with pre-test/post-test assessments.

Methods

Third-year nursing students enrolled in an 18-week paediatric simulation-based nursing course were purposively recruited (N = 110). One class (n = 55) received a researcher-developed cooperative learning program, which encouraged student support during class activities and simulations. The second class (control) received usual class instruction and simulations. The efficacy of the intervention was assessed by comparing mean scores at class enrolment (pre-test) and completion (post-test) for self-perceived problem-solving attitude, cooperative learning experience and knowledge of paediatric nursing. Paired t-tests compared pre-test with post-test scores for the two groups. ANCOVA examined differences in mean scores between groups. Correlations between differences in mean pre-test and post-test subscale scores for problem-solving attitude and cooperative learning experience were also examined.

Results

There was no significant difference in age or gender between groups. Mean post-test scores on the final exam were significantly higher for students who received the intervention (85.26, 95 % CI 84.19, 86.33) compared with controls (83.61, 95 % CI 82.52, 84.69; F = 4.63, p = 0.034). There were no significant differences in total scores for problem-solving attitude or cooperative learning experience or between groups. For the intervention group, two problem solving subscales were correlated with two cooperative learning subscales: problem solving confidence with learning motivation, respectively (r = 0.302, p = 0.025) and personal control with classroom learning, respectively (r = 0.389, p = 0.003). For the control group, approach-avoidance problem solving was negatively correlated with cooperative learning efficacy (r = −0.343, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Compared with the control group, nursing students who received the cooperative learning intervention had higher scores for knowledge of paediatric nursing, as well as learning motivation and attitude and problem-solving confidence, suggesting that the researcher-designed intervention facilitated simulation-based learning as well as confidence in problem-solving. Nurse educators could easily integrate the intervention into simulation-based paediatric nursing courses to enhance students' problem-solving abilities.
改进儿科护理模拟课程的合作学习干预:准实验研究
背景促进合作学习可以提高学生的参与度并改善学习效果。在实践经验有限的情况下,基于模拟的课程为护理专业学生提供了练习和磨练护理技能的机会。方法有目的性地招募三年级护理专业学生(N = 110)参加为期 18 周的儿科模拟护理课程。一个班(n = 55)接受了研究人员开发的合作学习计划,该计划鼓励学生在课堂活动和模拟过程中提供支持。第二个班级(对照组)接受常规课堂教学和模拟训练。通过比较学生在入学时(前测)和结业时(后测)在自我感觉解决问题的态度、合作学习经验和儿科护理知识方面的平均得分,来评估干预措施的效果。通过配对 t 检验比较了两组学生在测试前和测试后的得分。方差分析检验了组间平均分的差异。此外,还研究了解决问题的态度和合作学习经验的测试前和测试后平均分之间的相关性。与对照组(83.61,95 % CI 82.52,84.69;F = 4.63,p = 0.034)相比,接受干预的学生在期末考试后的平均得分明显更高(85.26,95 % CI 84.19,86.33)。组间在解决问题的态度或合作学习经验的总分上没有明显差异。干预组的两个问题解决分量表与两个合作学习分量表存在相关性:问题解决信心与学习动机分别为(r = 0.302,p = 0.025),个人控制与课堂学习分别为(r = 0.389,p = 0.003)。结论与对照组相比,接受合作学习干预的护生在儿科护理知识、学习动机和态度以及解决问题的信心方面得分更高,表明研究者设计的干预措施促进了模拟学习以及解决问题的信心。护士教育者可以很容易地将该干预措施整合到模拟儿科护理课程中,以提高学生解决问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信