Consensus and controversies on post-acute care decision making and referral to geriatric rehabilitation: A national survey

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Aafke J. de Groot , Ewout B. Smit , Dagmar Keizer , Cees M. P. M. Hertogh , Romke van Balen , Johannes C. van der Wouden , Elizabeth M. Wattel
{"title":"Consensus and controversies on post-acute care decision making and referral to geriatric rehabilitation: A national survey","authors":"Aafke J. de Groot ,&nbsp;Ewout B. Smit ,&nbsp;Dagmar Keizer ,&nbsp;Cees M. P. M. Hertogh ,&nbsp;Romke van Balen ,&nbsp;Johannes C. van der Wouden ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Wattel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transitioning older hospital patients to the appropriate type of post-acute care has become an urgent clinical issue within the context of changing demographics and limited duration of hospital stay.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Consensus on assessments that guide post-acute care decision making would benefit potential patients and support cooperation between settings.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A national web-based questionnaire focusing on professional contributions, patient involvement and the use of triage items and measures.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Hospital and geriatric rehabilitation professionals in the Netherlands participated as respondent groups, representing ‘sending’ and ‘receiving’ professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive questionnaire was used with open, multiple choice and closed questions, exploring in detail how assessment of hospital patients in need of a post-acute care decision was performed. Descriptive statistics were applied together with deductive coding of qualitative data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 104 hospital liaison nurses (66.7 %) and 52 GR professionals (33.3 %) participated. Respondents were reasonably satisfied with the current triage practice. Hospital liaison nurses valued their operational responsibility for triage. Geriatric rehabilitation professionals wanted active involvement in decision making and deemed hospital paramedic expertise sub-optimally applied. ‘Too little involvement’ of patients and families was felt by 50.0 % of the GR respondents versus 15.5 % of hospital respondents. The importance of half (47.8 %) of the triage items was rated differently between respondent groups. When discussing complex cases between sending and receiving professionals, views were felt as complementary.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both sending and receiving professionals expressed moderate satisfaction with post-acute care decision making, whereas their views on triage assessments differed according to setting and role. The patients’ voice may be insufficiently heard in triage decisions. Shared expertise and a consensual approach can develop when triage consultation is facilitated by both hospitals and PAC facilities. This study offers ingredients to reach a multi-professional view on post-acute care decision making and referral to geriatric rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Transitioning older hospital patients to the appropriate type of post-acute care has become an urgent clinical issue within the context of changing demographics and limited duration of hospital stay.

Objective

Consensus on assessments that guide post-acute care decision making would benefit potential patients and support cooperation between settings.

Design

A national web-based questionnaire focusing on professional contributions, patient involvement and the use of triage items and measures.

Participants

Hospital and geriatric rehabilitation professionals in the Netherlands participated as respondent groups, representing ‘sending’ and ‘receiving’ professionals.

Methods

A comprehensive questionnaire was used with open, multiple choice and closed questions, exploring in detail how assessment of hospital patients in need of a post-acute care decision was performed. Descriptive statistics were applied together with deductive coding of qualitative data.

Results

A total of 104 hospital liaison nurses (66.7 %) and 52 GR professionals (33.3 %) participated. Respondents were reasonably satisfied with the current triage practice. Hospital liaison nurses valued their operational responsibility for triage. Geriatric rehabilitation professionals wanted active involvement in decision making and deemed hospital paramedic expertise sub-optimally applied. ‘Too little involvement’ of patients and families was felt by 50.0 % of the GR respondents versus 15.5 % of hospital respondents. The importance of half (47.8 %) of the triage items was rated differently between respondent groups. When discussing complex cases between sending and receiving professionals, views were felt as complementary.

Conclusions

Both sending and receiving professionals expressed moderate satisfaction with post-acute care decision making, whereas their views on triage assessments differed according to setting and role. The patients’ voice may be insufficiently heard in triage decisions. Shared expertise and a consensual approach can develop when triage consultation is facilitated by both hospitals and PAC facilities. This study offers ingredients to reach a multi-professional view on post-acute care decision making and referral to geriatric rehabilitation.
关于急性期后护理决策和老年康复转诊的共识和争议:全国调查
背景在人口结构不断变化和住院时间有限的背景下,将老年住院患者转入适当类型的后期护理已成为一个紧迫的临床问题。目标就指导后期护理决策的评估达成共识将使潜在患者受益,并支持医疗机构之间的合作。设计一份全国性的网络问卷,重点是专业贡献、患者参与以及分流项目和措施的使用。参与人员荷兰的医院和老年康复专业人员作为受访者群体参与了调查,他们分别代表 "发送 "和 "接收 "专业人员。方法使用一份包含开放式、多项选择和封闭式问题的综合问卷,详细探讨了如何对需要作出后期护理决定的医院患者进行评估。结果 共有 104 名医院联络护士(66.7%)和 52 名 GR 专业人员(33.3%)参与了问卷调查。受访者对目前的分诊做法比较满意。医院联络护士非常重视分诊工作中的业务责任。老年康复专业人员希望积极参与决策,并认为医院辅助医务人员的专业知识应用不够理想。50.0%的老年病康复受访者认为患者和家属的参与 "太少",而医院受访者的这一比例为 15.5%。各组受访者对半数(47.8%)分诊项目的重要性评价不同。在送诊和接诊专业人员讨论复杂病例时,他们的观点是互补的。结论送诊和接诊专业人员对急性期后护理决策均表示基本满意,但他们对分诊评估的观点因环境和角色而异。在分流决策中,患者的声音可能没有被充分听取。如果医院和 PAC 机构都能为分流咨询提供便利,就能形成共享的专业知识和协商一致的方法。这项研究提供了一些素材,有助于就急性期后护理决策和老年康复转诊达成多专业意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信