Predictors of duodenal eosinophil counts among subjects undergoing diagnostic endoscopy.

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2024-09-01
S Mahendra Raj, S Ravindran, L K Hui, M Kaur, M C Braganza, A P Kunnath
{"title":"Predictors of duodenal eosinophil counts among subjects undergoing diagnostic endoscopy.","authors":"S Mahendra Raj, S Ravindran, L K Hui, M Kaur, M C Braganza, A P Kunnath","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Duodenal eosinophilia has been implicated in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia. In a retrospective observational study, we previously reported that duodenal eosinophilia (as defined by a mucosal count of greater than 15 eosinophils per 5 high power fields), was associated with symptomatic erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), concomitant co-morbidities and Chinese ethnicity but not functional dyspepsia among 289 multiracial subjects undergoing diagnostic endoscopy in 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic. We tested the reproducibility of those findings on a larger sample that included the original cohort and another 221 subjects who underwent endoscopy in 2022 after the easing of pandemic restrictions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Archived duodenal histology slides were assessed by a pathologist blind to demographic and clinical data gleamed retrospectively from clinical chart review. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore associations between duodenal eosinophilia and the variables age, gender, ethnicity, year of sampling (2019 vs 2022), concomitant co-morbidities, functional dyspepsia, symptomatic erosive GERD (Los Angeles Grades A to D), endoscopic oesophagitis, gallstone disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, irritable bowel syndrome and NSAID consumption. Three different thresholds for defining duodenal eosinophilia (>15, >22 and >30 eosinophils per 5 high power fields) were tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Year of sampling (2019, pre-pandemic) strongly predicted duodenal eosinophilia across all thresholds (OR 11.76, 13.11 and 21.41 respectively; p = 0.000). The presence of concomitant co-morbidities was a modest predictor across all thresholds whereas Chinese ethnicity only predicted at the lowest threshold. Absolute duodenal eosinophil counts predicted symptomatic erosive GERD (OR 1.03; p = 0.015) but not functional dyspepsia (OR 1.00; p = 0.896) after adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, concomitant comorbidities and year of endoscopy. None of the subjects reached the threshold for the diagnosis of eosinophilic duodenitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cumulative impact of environmental exposures on duodenal eosinophil counts may be much greater than of putative factors linked to functional dyspepsia. A signal linking duodenal eosinophil counts and symptomatic erosive GERD was detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Duodenal eosinophilia has been implicated in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia. In a retrospective observational study, we previously reported that duodenal eosinophilia (as defined by a mucosal count of greater than 15 eosinophils per 5 high power fields), was associated with symptomatic erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), concomitant co-morbidities and Chinese ethnicity but not functional dyspepsia among 289 multiracial subjects undergoing diagnostic endoscopy in 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic. We tested the reproducibility of those findings on a larger sample that included the original cohort and another 221 subjects who underwent endoscopy in 2022 after the easing of pandemic restrictions.

Materials and methods: Archived duodenal histology slides were assessed by a pathologist blind to demographic and clinical data gleamed retrospectively from clinical chart review. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore associations between duodenal eosinophilia and the variables age, gender, ethnicity, year of sampling (2019 vs 2022), concomitant co-morbidities, functional dyspepsia, symptomatic erosive GERD (Los Angeles Grades A to D), endoscopic oesophagitis, gallstone disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, irritable bowel syndrome and NSAID consumption. Three different thresholds for defining duodenal eosinophilia (>15, >22 and >30 eosinophils per 5 high power fields) were tested.

Results: Year of sampling (2019, pre-pandemic) strongly predicted duodenal eosinophilia across all thresholds (OR 11.76, 13.11 and 21.41 respectively; p = 0.000). The presence of concomitant co-morbidities was a modest predictor across all thresholds whereas Chinese ethnicity only predicted at the lowest threshold. Absolute duodenal eosinophil counts predicted symptomatic erosive GERD (OR 1.03; p = 0.015) but not functional dyspepsia (OR 1.00; p = 0.896) after adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, concomitant comorbidities and year of endoscopy. None of the subjects reached the threshold for the diagnosis of eosinophilic duodenitis.

Conclusion: The cumulative impact of environmental exposures on duodenal eosinophil counts may be much greater than of putative factors linked to functional dyspepsia. A signal linking duodenal eosinophil counts and symptomatic erosive GERD was detected.

接受诊断性内窥镜检查者十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞计数的预测因素。
导言:十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞增多与功能性消化不良的病理生理学有关。在一项回顾性观察研究中,我们曾报告说,在 COVID-19 大流行前的 2019 年,289 名接受诊断性内镜检查的多种族受试者中,十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞增多(定义为每 5 个高倍视野中粘膜计数大于 15 个嗜酸性粒细胞)与无症状侵蚀性胃食管反流病(GERD)、并发症和中国人种有关,但与功能性消化不良无关。我们在一个更大的样本中测试了这些发现的可重复性,该样本包括原始队列以及在大流行限制放宽后于2022年接受内镜检查的另外221名受试者:存档的十二指肠组织学切片由一名病理学家进行评估,该病理学家对从临床病历回顾中收集的人口统计学和临床数据视而不见。采用逻辑回归分析法探讨十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞增多与年龄、性别、种族、采样年份(2019年与2022年)、伴随并发症、功能性消化不良、无症状侵蚀性胃食管反流病(洛杉矶A级至D级)、内镜下食管炎、胆石症、幽门螺杆菌感染、肠易激综合征和非甾体抗炎药服用量等变量之间的关联。对定义十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞增多的三种不同阈值(每5个高倍视野中嗜酸性粒细胞数>15、>22和>30)进行了测试:在所有阈值下,采样年份(2019 年、大流行前)都能强烈预测十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞增多(OR 分别为 11.76、13.11 和 21.41;P = 0.000)。在所有临界值中,是否存在并发症对预测结果的影响都不大,而华裔仅在最低临界值时对预测结果有影响。十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞绝对计数可预测有症状的侵蚀性胃食管反流病(OR 1.03; p = 0.015),但在调整年龄、性别、种族、并发症和内镜检查年份后,不能预测功能性消化不良(OR 1.00; p = 0.896)。所有受试者均未达到嗜酸性粒细胞十二指肠炎的诊断标准:结论:环境暴露对十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞计数的累积影响可能远远大于与功能性消化不良相关的假定因素。发现了十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞计数与有症状的侵蚀性胃食管反流病之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信