Organisms causing community-acquired bloodstream infection in medical department: A single centre retrospective observational study.

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2024-09-01
R Suganthini, T Suvintheran, Z A Nor Zanariah
{"title":"Organisms causing community-acquired bloodstream infection in medical department: A single centre retrospective observational study.","authors":"R Suganthini, T Suvintheran, Z A Nor Zanariah","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Community acquired bloodstream infection (CA-BSI) is positive blood culture obtained within 48 hours of hospital admission. Bloodstream infections need to be treated with antibiotics. Inappropriate choice of antibiotics will lead to antimicrobial resistance. This is an observational retrospective study to look at the antimicrobial resistance of organisms causing bloodstream infections in patients admitted to the medical wards in our centre. The aim of the study is to determine the appropriate choice of empirical antibiotics for suspected CA-BSI in our hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients admitted to medical wards with blood stream infection during the period January 2021 to June 2021 were enrolled. Identification of organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were obtained. Information regarding the severity of the bacteremia was collected by assessing if the patient needed inotropes, mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy. Data on comorbidities which were the presence of end-stage renal failure, diabetic mellitus and immunosuppression were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 269 cases were screened. Out of these 104 communities acquired cases were included. The pathogens frequently isolated were gram negative organisms most commonly Escherichia coli (43%) and Klebsiella species (30%). Staphylococcus aureus accounts for the majority of gram-positive organisms. Only two out of 20 Staphylococcus aureus were methicillin resistant. Bulkholderia pseudomallei accounts for 7.8% cases. All Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates were sensitive to cotrimoxazole. Escherichia coli (46%) isolates demonstrated a higher resistance pattern to Augmentin compared to klebsiella species (17.4%). The overall mortality rate was 22%, with higher rates for those critically ill (39%). Patients with Enterobacteriaceae infection showed no difference in outcome between the groups of patients according to sensitivity to Augmentin and cefotaxime. These groups of patients who were critically ill did not demonstrate any significant difference in terms of resistance pattern to Augmentin (p = 0.3) and cefotaxime (p = 0.7). Patients who are aged 65 or older have a significantly more resistant pattern to Augmentin and cefotaxime.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiogram serves as a guide for clinicians to choose appropriate choices of antibiotics based on local data. Empirical antibiotics of choice for patients with sepsis should be narrow-spectrum beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors. Broad spectrum beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors such as piperacillin tazobactam should be reserved for patients who are critically ill and elderly patients over 65 years. The antibiotics should be deescalated once the organisms and sensitivity of the antibiotics are known.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Community acquired bloodstream infection (CA-BSI) is positive blood culture obtained within 48 hours of hospital admission. Bloodstream infections need to be treated with antibiotics. Inappropriate choice of antibiotics will lead to antimicrobial resistance. This is an observational retrospective study to look at the antimicrobial resistance of organisms causing bloodstream infections in patients admitted to the medical wards in our centre. The aim of the study is to determine the appropriate choice of empirical antibiotics for suspected CA-BSI in our hospital.

Materials and methods: All patients admitted to medical wards with blood stream infection during the period January 2021 to June 2021 were enrolled. Identification of organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were obtained. Information regarding the severity of the bacteremia was collected by assessing if the patient needed inotropes, mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy. Data on comorbidities which were the presence of end-stage renal failure, diabetic mellitus and immunosuppression were collected.

Results: Total of 269 cases were screened. Out of these 104 communities acquired cases were included. The pathogens frequently isolated were gram negative organisms most commonly Escherichia coli (43%) and Klebsiella species (30%). Staphylococcus aureus accounts for the majority of gram-positive organisms. Only two out of 20 Staphylococcus aureus were methicillin resistant. Bulkholderia pseudomallei accounts for 7.8% cases. All Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates were sensitive to cotrimoxazole. Escherichia coli (46%) isolates demonstrated a higher resistance pattern to Augmentin compared to klebsiella species (17.4%). The overall mortality rate was 22%, with higher rates for those critically ill (39%). Patients with Enterobacteriaceae infection showed no difference in outcome between the groups of patients according to sensitivity to Augmentin and cefotaxime. These groups of patients who were critically ill did not demonstrate any significant difference in terms of resistance pattern to Augmentin (p = 0.3) and cefotaxime (p = 0.7). Patients who are aged 65 or older have a significantly more resistant pattern to Augmentin and cefotaxime.

Conclusion: Antibiogram serves as a guide for clinicians to choose appropriate choices of antibiotics based on local data. Empirical antibiotics of choice for patients with sepsis should be narrow-spectrum beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors. Broad spectrum beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors such as piperacillin tazobactam should be reserved for patients who are critically ill and elderly patients over 65 years. The antibiotics should be deescalated once the organisms and sensitivity of the antibiotics are known.

引起内科社区获得性血流感染的病原体:单中心回顾性观察研究。
导言:社区获得性血流感染(CA-BSI)是指入院 48 小时内血液培养呈阳性。血流感染需要使用抗生素治疗。抗生素选择不当会导致抗菌药耐药性。这是一项观察性回顾研究,旨在了解本中心内科病房住院病人中引起血流感染的微生物对抗生素的耐药性。研究的目的是确定本医院在治疗疑似 CA-BSI 时经验性抗生素的适当选择:研究对象为 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间内科病房收治的所有血流感染患者。进行微生物鉴定和抗菌药敏感性测试。通过评估患者是否需要肌注、机械通气或肾脏替代治疗,收集有关菌血症严重程度的信息。此外,还收集了合并症数据,包括终末期肾衰竭、糖尿病和免疫抑制:结果:共筛查出 269 个病例。结果:共筛查出 269 例病例,其中 104 例为社区获得性病例。经常分离到的病原体是革兰氏阴性菌,最常见的是大肠埃希菌(43%)和克雷伯菌(30%)。金黄色葡萄球菌占革兰氏阳性菌的大多数。20 个金黄色葡萄球菌中只有两个对甲氧西林有抗药性。假马来球菌占 7.8%。所有分离到的假马来球菌都对复方新诺明敏感。与克雷伯氏菌(17.4%)相比,大肠埃希菌(46%)分离株对奥格门汀的耐药性更高。总死亡率为 22%,重症患者的死亡率更高(39%)。肠杆菌科细菌感染患者对奥格门汀和头孢他啶的敏感性显示,各组患者的预后没有差异。这两组重症患者对奥格门汀(P = 0.3)和头孢他啶(P = 0.7)的耐药性模式也无明显差异。65岁或以上的患者对Augmentin和头孢他啶的耐药模式明显更多:抗生素图谱是临床医生根据当地数据选择适当抗生素的指南。败血症患者的经验性抗生素应选择窄谱β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂。广谱β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(如哌拉西林他唑巴坦)应保留给重症患者和 65 岁以上的老年患者。一旦知道病原体和对抗生素的敏感性,就应降低抗生素的等级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信