{"title":"Organisms causing community-acquired bloodstream infection in medical department: A single centre retrospective observational study.","authors":"R Suganthini, T Suvintheran, Z A Nor Zanariah","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Community acquired bloodstream infection (CA-BSI) is positive blood culture obtained within 48 hours of hospital admission. Bloodstream infections need to be treated with antibiotics. Inappropriate choice of antibiotics will lead to antimicrobial resistance. This is an observational retrospective study to look at the antimicrobial resistance of organisms causing bloodstream infections in patients admitted to the medical wards in our centre. The aim of the study is to determine the appropriate choice of empirical antibiotics for suspected CA-BSI in our hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients admitted to medical wards with blood stream infection during the period January 2021 to June 2021 were enrolled. Identification of organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were obtained. Information regarding the severity of the bacteremia was collected by assessing if the patient needed inotropes, mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy. Data on comorbidities which were the presence of end-stage renal failure, diabetic mellitus and immunosuppression were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 269 cases were screened. Out of these 104 communities acquired cases were included. The pathogens frequently isolated were gram negative organisms most commonly Escherichia coli (43%) and Klebsiella species (30%). Staphylococcus aureus accounts for the majority of gram-positive organisms. Only two out of 20 Staphylococcus aureus were methicillin resistant. Bulkholderia pseudomallei accounts for 7.8% cases. All Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates were sensitive to cotrimoxazole. Escherichia coli (46%) isolates demonstrated a higher resistance pattern to Augmentin compared to klebsiella species (17.4%). The overall mortality rate was 22%, with higher rates for those critically ill (39%). Patients with Enterobacteriaceae infection showed no difference in outcome between the groups of patients according to sensitivity to Augmentin and cefotaxime. These groups of patients who were critically ill did not demonstrate any significant difference in terms of resistance pattern to Augmentin (p = 0.3) and cefotaxime (p = 0.7). Patients who are aged 65 or older have a significantly more resistant pattern to Augmentin and cefotaxime.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiogram serves as a guide for clinicians to choose appropriate choices of antibiotics based on local data. Empirical antibiotics of choice for patients with sepsis should be narrow-spectrum beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors. Broad spectrum beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors such as piperacillin tazobactam should be reserved for patients who are critically ill and elderly patients over 65 years. The antibiotics should be deescalated once the organisms and sensitivity of the antibiotics are known.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Community acquired bloodstream infection (CA-BSI) is positive blood culture obtained within 48 hours of hospital admission. Bloodstream infections need to be treated with antibiotics. Inappropriate choice of antibiotics will lead to antimicrobial resistance. This is an observational retrospective study to look at the antimicrobial resistance of organisms causing bloodstream infections in patients admitted to the medical wards in our centre. The aim of the study is to determine the appropriate choice of empirical antibiotics for suspected CA-BSI in our hospital.
Materials and methods: All patients admitted to medical wards with blood stream infection during the period January 2021 to June 2021 were enrolled. Identification of organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were obtained. Information regarding the severity of the bacteremia was collected by assessing if the patient needed inotropes, mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy. Data on comorbidities which were the presence of end-stage renal failure, diabetic mellitus and immunosuppression were collected.
Results: Total of 269 cases were screened. Out of these 104 communities acquired cases were included. The pathogens frequently isolated were gram negative organisms most commonly Escherichia coli (43%) and Klebsiella species (30%). Staphylococcus aureus accounts for the majority of gram-positive organisms. Only two out of 20 Staphylococcus aureus were methicillin resistant. Bulkholderia pseudomallei accounts for 7.8% cases. All Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates were sensitive to cotrimoxazole. Escherichia coli (46%) isolates demonstrated a higher resistance pattern to Augmentin compared to klebsiella species (17.4%). The overall mortality rate was 22%, with higher rates for those critically ill (39%). Patients with Enterobacteriaceae infection showed no difference in outcome between the groups of patients according to sensitivity to Augmentin and cefotaxime. These groups of patients who were critically ill did not demonstrate any significant difference in terms of resistance pattern to Augmentin (p = 0.3) and cefotaxime (p = 0.7). Patients who are aged 65 or older have a significantly more resistant pattern to Augmentin and cefotaxime.
Conclusion: Antibiogram serves as a guide for clinicians to choose appropriate choices of antibiotics based on local data. Empirical antibiotics of choice for patients with sepsis should be narrow-spectrum beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors. Broad spectrum beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors such as piperacillin tazobactam should be reserved for patients who are critically ill and elderly patients over 65 years. The antibiotics should be deescalated once the organisms and sensitivity of the antibiotics are known.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.