Navigating Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation decisions in emergency department in Malaysia: A retrospective study.

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2024-09-01
K S Chew, H T M Kho, X Y Yang
{"title":"Navigating Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation decisions in emergency department in Malaysia: A retrospective study.","authors":"K S Chew, H T M Kho, X Y Yang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The practice of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) aims to respect patient autonomy and acknowledge medical futility. Despite its global acceptance, there is limited research on DNAR in many Asian countries, including Malaysia. This study addressed this gap by exploring DNAR decision-making processes in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed-method retrospective study was conducted in the emergency and trauma department (ETD) of Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia, from February to July 2023. Data were collected from 115 DNAR cases using a surveillance form to document the patient demographics, types of DNAR orders, initiating physicians, reasons for DNAR, surrogate decision-makers, specific types of procedures withheld or withdrawn and outcomes. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data, while inferential statistical analysis was applied to quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 71.32 years, with a male predominance (63.5%). The primary reasons for DNAR included \"critical illness with poor prognosis\" (33.9%), \"advanced age with frailty and poor prognosis\" (20.9%) and \"massive haemorrhagic or ischemic stroke\" (16.5%). Most DNAR decisions involved withholding resuscitation (90.4%) and were initiated mainly by internal medicine (52.2%) and emergency medicine teams (34.8%). Surrogate decisionmakers were predominantly adult children (63.5%). Only one case had an advance directive. Majority of patients (80.9%) were admitted to wards, while 16.5% died in the emergency department. The median age of patients was significantly older when adult children (78 years) and spouses (76 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (64.5 years and 62.5 years, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Conversely, the median age was significantly younger when parents (41.5 years) and siblings (64 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (75 years and 74 years, respectively; p < 0.001 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced directives are rarely applied in Malaysia. DNAR decisions are typically made by surrogates when patients are critically ill, which is a common trend in many Asian cultures where discussing death is taboo. Cultural norms often lead families to withhold terminal diagnoses from patients, posing challenges for end-of-life care. The most frequent surrogates were adult children, who face dilemmas balancing aggressive treatment and their parents' wishes. The study underscores the need for better communication and decision-making support in emergency departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"79 5","pages":"591-596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The practice of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) aims to respect patient autonomy and acknowledge medical futility. Despite its global acceptance, there is limited research on DNAR in many Asian countries, including Malaysia. This study addressed this gap by exploring DNAR decision-making processes in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.

Materials and methods: A mixed-method retrospective study was conducted in the emergency and trauma department (ETD) of Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia, from February to July 2023. Data were collected from 115 DNAR cases using a surveillance form to document the patient demographics, types of DNAR orders, initiating physicians, reasons for DNAR, surrogate decision-makers, specific types of procedures withheld or withdrawn and outcomes. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data, while inferential statistical analysis was applied to quantitative data.

Results: The mean age of patients was 71.32 years, with a male predominance (63.5%). The primary reasons for DNAR included "critical illness with poor prognosis" (33.9%), "advanced age with frailty and poor prognosis" (20.9%) and "massive haemorrhagic or ischemic stroke" (16.5%). Most DNAR decisions involved withholding resuscitation (90.4%) and were initiated mainly by internal medicine (52.2%) and emergency medicine teams (34.8%). Surrogate decisionmakers were predominantly adult children (63.5%). Only one case had an advance directive. Majority of patients (80.9%) were admitted to wards, while 16.5% died in the emergency department. The median age of patients was significantly older when adult children (78 years) and spouses (76 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (64.5 years and 62.5 years, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Conversely, the median age was significantly younger when parents (41.5 years) and siblings (64 years) were the surrogates, compared to when they were not involved (75 years and 74 years, respectively; p < 0.001 for both).

Conclusion: Advanced directives are rarely applied in Malaysia. DNAR decisions are typically made by surrogates when patients are critically ill, which is a common trend in many Asian cultures where discussing death is taboo. Cultural norms often lead families to withhold terminal diagnoses from patients, posing challenges for end-of-life care. The most frequent surrogates were adult children, who face dilemmas balancing aggressive treatment and their parents' wishes. The study underscores the need for better communication and decision-making support in emergency departments.

马来西亚急诊科的 "不尝试复苏 "决策导航:一项回顾性研究。
导言:不尝试复苏(DNAR)的目的是尊重病人的自主权并承认医疗无效。尽管 DNAR 已被全球所接受,但包括马来西亚在内的许多亚洲国家对 DNAR 的研究却十分有限。本研究通过探讨马来西亚一家三级医院的 DNAR 决策过程,填补了这一空白:2023 年 2 月至 7 月,在马来西亚沙捞越总医院急诊与创伤科(ETD)开展了一项混合方法回顾性研究。研究人员使用监控表收集了115例DNAR病例的数据,记录了患者的人口统计学特征、DNAR命令的类型、启动医生、DNAR的原因、代理决策者、暂缓或撤销程序的具体类型以及结果。定性数据采用主题分析法,定量数据采用推理统计分析法:患者的平均年龄为 71.32 岁,男性占多数(63.5%)。DNAR的主要原因包括 "预后不良的危重病"(33.9%)、"年老体弱、预后不良"(20.9%)和 "大出血或缺血性中风"(16.5%)。大多数 DNAR 决定涉及暂停复苏(90.4%),主要由内科(52.2%)和急诊科团队(34.8%)发起。代理决策者主要是成年子女(63.5%)。只有一个病例有预先指示。大多数患者(80.9%)住进了病房,16.5%的患者死于急诊科。在成年子女(78 岁)和配偶(76 岁)作为代治人的情况下,患者的中位年龄明显大于没有代治人的情况(分别为 64.5 岁和 62.5 岁;p < 0.001 和 p = 0.003)。相反,当父母(41.5 岁)和兄弟姐妹(64 岁)作为代理人时,他们的年龄中位数明显小于未作为代理人时(分别为 75 岁和 74 岁;两者的 p < 0.001):结论:马来西亚很少采用预先指示。当患者病情危重时,DNAR决定通常由代理人做出,这是许多亚洲文化的共同趋势,在这些文化中,讨论死亡是禁忌。文化规范往往导致家属对病人隐瞒临终诊断,给临终关怀带来挑战。最常见的代治者是成年子女,他们面临着积极治疗与父母意愿之间的两难选择。这项研究强调,急诊科需要更好的沟通和决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信