Role of Embolic Protection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention without Saphenous Venous graft lesions in ST-elevation myocardial infarction - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Maisha Maliha, Vikyath Satish, Kuan Yu Chi, Diego Barzallo Zeas, Amrin Kharawala, Nathaniel Abittan, Sneha Nandy, Nidhi Madan, Prabhjot Singh, Eleonora Gashi
{"title":"Role of Embolic Protection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention without Saphenous Venous graft lesions in ST-elevation myocardial infarction - a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maisha Maliha, Vikyath Satish, Kuan Yu Chi, Diego Barzallo Zeas, Amrin Kharawala, Nathaniel Abittan, Sneha Nandy, Nidhi Madan, Prabhjot Singh, Eleonora Gashi","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Embolic protection devices are catheter-based devices that can be used to capture atherosclerotic remnants released during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aim to study the efficacy and safety of EPDs in PCIs without saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>3 electronic databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to Apr 10, 2024, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes of patients subjected to EPD during PCI with control group where EPDs were not utilized. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days, post-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow attainment, ST-segment resolution at 90 minutes post-procedure and post-procedure angiographically detectable signs of distal embolization. The effect estimates of outcomes were assessed using risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the restricted maximum likelihood method given the inter-study variance was inevitable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 3 RCTs enrolling 741 patients (age 61.6 ± 12.15 years, 22% females) undergoing PCI without SVG lesions. As opposed to the control group, the use of EPD did not yield a significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.31-1.86; I 2 = 0%), MACCE (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34-1.27; I 2 = 0%), post-PCI TIMI 3 flow (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86-1.62; I 2 = 77%) and ST segment resolution at 90 minutes post-procedure (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90-1.22; I 2 = 0%). However, EPD significantly decreased angiographically detectable signs of distal embolization (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.99; I 2 = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EPD significantly reduced angiographically detectable signs of distal embolization in PCI without SVG lesions in STEMI, though there were no clinical signs of improved flow or mortality. Further trials are necessary to thoroughly evaluate the potential benefits and requirements of EPD usage in such procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Embolic protection devices are catheter-based devices that can be used to capture atherosclerotic remnants released during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aim to study the efficacy and safety of EPDs in PCIs without saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).

Methods: 3 electronic databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to Apr 10, 2024, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes of patients subjected to EPD during PCI with control group where EPDs were not utilized. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days, post-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow attainment, ST-segment resolution at 90 minutes post-procedure and post-procedure angiographically detectable signs of distal embolization. The effect estimates of outcomes were assessed using risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the restricted maximum likelihood method given the inter-study variance was inevitable.

Results: We included 3 RCTs enrolling 741 patients (age 61.6 ± 12.15 years, 22% females) undergoing PCI without SVG lesions. As opposed to the control group, the use of EPD did not yield a significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.31-1.86; I 2 = 0%), MACCE (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34-1.27; I 2 = 0%), post-PCI TIMI 3 flow (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86-1.62; I 2 = 77%) and ST segment resolution at 90 minutes post-procedure (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90-1.22; I 2 = 0%). However, EPD significantly decreased angiographically detectable signs of distal embolization (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.99; I 2 = 0%).

Conclusions: EPD significantly reduced angiographically detectable signs of distal embolization in PCI without SVG lesions in STEMI, though there were no clinical signs of improved flow or mortality. Further trials are necessary to thoroughly evaluate the potential benefits and requirements of EPD usage in such procedures.

栓塞保护在 ST 段抬高心肌梗死无隐静脉移植病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用--系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:栓塞保护装置是一种基于导管的装置,可用于捕捉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)过程中释放的动脉粥样硬化残余物。我们的目的是研究栓塞保护装置在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)无大隐静脉移植物(SVG)的PCI中的有效性和安全性。方法:我们检索了MEDLINE、Web of Science和Embase等3个电子数据库中从开始到2024年4月10日的内容,以确定相关的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了在PCI中使用栓塞保护装置的患者与未使用栓塞保护装置的对照组的预后。主要结果是 30 天全因死亡率。次要结果是 30 天内的主要不良心脑血管事件 (MACCE)、PCI 后心肌梗死溶栓 (TIMI) 3 级血流达标率、术后 90 分钟 ST 段缓解率和术后血管造影检测到的远端栓塞迹象。采用风险比 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 评估结果的效应估计值。鉴于研究间的差异不可避免,我们采用限制性最大似然法进行了随机效应荟萃分析:我们纳入了 3 项研究,共 741 名患者(年龄为 61.6 ± 12.15 岁,22% 为女性)在没有 SVG 病变的情况下接受了 PCI 治疗。与对照组相比,使用 EPD 对全因死亡率(RR,0.76;95% CI,0.31-1.86;I2 = 0%)、MACCE(RR,0.66;95% CI,0.34-1.27;I2 = 0%)、PCI 后 TIMI 3 血流(RR,1.18;95% CI,0.86-1.62;I2 = 77%)和术后 90 分钟 ST 段分辨率(RR,1.05;95% CI,0.90-1.22;I2 = 0%)。然而,EPD可明显减少血管造影可检测到的远端栓塞迹象(RR,0.60;95% CI,0.36-0.99;I2 = 0%):EPD可明显减少STEMI患者无SVG病变的PCI手术中血管造影可检测到的远端栓塞迹象,尽管没有改善血流或死亡率的临床表现。有必要进一步开展试验,以全面评估在此类手术中使用 EPD 的潜在益处和要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信