Impact of the completeness of revascularization and high bleeding risk status in acute coronary syndrome patients with multi-vessel disease: A retrospective analysis.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20480040241283152
Tanawat Attachaipanich, Phasakorn Putchagarn, Tasalak Thonghong, Krit Leemasawat, Panupong Pota, Aekapat Phoksiri, Srun Kuanprasert, Pannipa Suwannasom
{"title":"Impact of the completeness of revascularization and high bleeding risk status in acute coronary syndrome patients with multi-vessel disease: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Tanawat Attachaipanich, Phasakorn Putchagarn, Tasalak Thonghong, Krit Leemasawat, Panupong Pota, Aekapat Phoksiri, Srun Kuanprasert, Pannipa Suwannasom","doi":"10.1177/20480040241283152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the long-term mortality of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with multivessel disease according to the level of completeness of revascularization (CR) and high-bleeding risk (HBR) status.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>This retrospective study collected the data of ACS patients with multivessel disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between May 2018 and February 2019. Complete to reasonable revascularization (CR) was defined by the residual Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score (RSS) of 0 to ≤8. The HBR was defined by the PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The all-cause death at 36 months according to the CR and HBR status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 209 patients with 743 lesions were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 3.6 years. Patients with CR had lower event rates than ICR (4.5 vs. 11.5 per 100 patient-year, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.70), p = 0.002). Similar observations were noted when compared between non-HBR and HBR (3.9 vs. 11.1 per 100 patient-year, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.64, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that all-cause death was highest among those in the ICR/HBR (40.5%) followed by ICR/non-HBR (28.6%), CR/non-HBR (28.3%) and the lowest among the CR/HBR group (7.1%), log-rank p = <0.001. No significant interaction was observed between the two factors regarding all-cause death (p = 0.10 for interaction).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In ACS patients with MVD, the achievement of CR was associated with reducing mortality rates and consistency irrespective of the HBR status. (Trial Registration: TCTR20211222003).</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"13 ","pages":"20480040241283152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040241283152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the long-term mortality of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with multivessel disease according to the level of completeness of revascularization (CR) and high-bleeding risk (HBR) status.

Design setting and participants: This retrospective study collected the data of ACS patients with multivessel disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between May 2018 and February 2019. Complete to reasonable revascularization (CR) was defined by the residual Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score (RSS) of 0 to ≤8. The HBR was defined by the PRECISE-DAPT score ≥25.

Main outcome measures: The all-cause death at 36 months according to the CR and HBR status.

Results: A total of 209 patients with 743 lesions were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 3.6 years. Patients with CR had lower event rates than ICR (4.5 vs. 11.5 per 100 patient-year, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.70), p = 0.002). Similar observations were noted when compared between non-HBR and HBR (3.9 vs. 11.1 per 100 patient-year, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.64, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that all-cause death was highest among those in the ICR/HBR (40.5%) followed by ICR/non-HBR (28.6%), CR/non-HBR (28.3%) and the lowest among the CR/HBR group (7.1%), log-rank p = <0.001. No significant interaction was observed between the two factors regarding all-cause death (p = 0.10 for interaction).

Conclusions: In ACS patients with MVD, the achievement of CR was associated with reducing mortality rates and consistency irrespective of the HBR status. (Trial Registration: TCTR20211222003).

多血管疾病急性冠状动脉综合征患者血管重建完整性和高出血风险状态的影响:回顾性分析
目的根据血管再通(CR)完全程度和高出血风险(HBR)状态,研究急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)多支血管疾病患者的长期死亡率:这项回顾性研究收集了2018年5月至2019年2月期间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支血管疾病ACS患者的数据。完全至合理血运重建(CR)的定义是:Taxus经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术之间的剩余协同作用评分(RSS)为0至≤8。HBR的定义是PRECISE-DAPT评分≥25分:主要结果指标:根据CR和HBR状态得出的36个月内全因死亡人数:共有209名患者的743个病灶被纳入分析。中位随访时间为3.6年。CR患者的事件发生率低于ICR患者(4.5 vs. 11.5 per 100 patient-year, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.70), p = 0.002)。非 HBR 和 HBR 相比也有类似的观察结果(每 100 名患者每年 3.9 例与 11.1 例相比,HR 0.35,95% CI 0.18-0.64,P=0.002):在患有 MVD 的 ACS 患者中,无论 HBR 状态如何,达到 CR 都与降低死亡率和一致性相关。(试验注册:TCTR20211222003)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信