Emergency Medicine Milestones Final Ratings Are Often Subpar.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Diane L Gorgas, Kevin B Joldersma, Felix K Ankel, Wallace A Carter, Melissa A Barton, Earl J Reisdorff
{"title":"Emergency Medicine Milestones Final Ratings Are Often Subpar.","authors":"Diane L Gorgas, Kevin B Joldersma, Felix K Ankel, Wallace A Carter, Melissa A Barton, Earl J Reisdorff","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergency medicine (EM) milestones are objective behaviors that are categorized into thematic domains called \"subcompetencies\" (eg, emergency stabilization). The scale for rating milestones is predicated on the assumption that a rating (level) of 1.0 corresponds to an incoming EM-1 resident and a rating of 4.0 is the \"target rating\" (albeit not an expectation) for a graduating resident. Our aim in this study was to determine the frequency with which graduating residents received the target milestone ratings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study was a secondary analysis of a dataset used in a prior study but was not reported previously. We analyzed milestone subcompetency ratings from April 25-June 24, 2022 for categorical EM residents in their final year of training. Ratings were dichotomized as meeting the expected level at the time of program completion (ratings of ≥3.5) and not meeting the expected level at the time of program completion (ratings of ≤3.0). We calculated the number of residents who did not achieve target ratings for each of the subcompetencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Spring 2022, of the 2,637 residents in the spring of their last year of training, 1,613 (61.2%) achieved a rating of ≥3.5 on every subcompetency and 1,024 (38.8%) failed to achieve that rating on at least one subcompetency. There were 250 residents (9.5%) who failed to achieve half of their expected subcompetency ratings and 105 (4.0%) who failed to achieve the expected rating (ie, rating was ≤3.0) on every subcompetency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When using an EM milestone rating threshold of 3.5, only 61.2% of physicians achieved the target ratings for program graduation; 4.0% of physicians failed to achieve target ratings for any milestone subcompetency; and 9.5% of physicians failed to achieve the target ratings for graduating residents in half of the subcompetencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"735-738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The emergency medicine (EM) milestones are objective behaviors that are categorized into thematic domains called "subcompetencies" (eg, emergency stabilization). The scale for rating milestones is predicated on the assumption that a rating (level) of 1.0 corresponds to an incoming EM-1 resident and a rating of 4.0 is the "target rating" (albeit not an expectation) for a graduating resident. Our aim in this study was to determine the frequency with which graduating residents received the target milestone ratings.

Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study was a secondary analysis of a dataset used in a prior study but was not reported previously. We analyzed milestone subcompetency ratings from April 25-June 24, 2022 for categorical EM residents in their final year of training. Ratings were dichotomized as meeting the expected level at the time of program completion (ratings of ≥3.5) and not meeting the expected level at the time of program completion (ratings of ≤3.0). We calculated the number of residents who did not achieve target ratings for each of the subcompetencies.

Results: In Spring 2022, of the 2,637 residents in the spring of their last year of training, 1,613 (61.2%) achieved a rating of ≥3.5 on every subcompetency and 1,024 (38.8%) failed to achieve that rating on at least one subcompetency. There were 250 residents (9.5%) who failed to achieve half of their expected subcompetency ratings and 105 (4.0%) who failed to achieve the expected rating (ie, rating was ≤3.0) on every subcompetency.

Conclusion: When using an EM milestone rating threshold of 3.5, only 61.2% of physicians achieved the target ratings for program graduation; 4.0% of physicians failed to achieve target ratings for any milestone subcompetency; and 9.5% of physicians failed to achieve the target ratings for graduating residents in half of the subcompetencies.

急诊医学里程碑的最终评分往往不达标。
背景:急诊医学(EM)里程碑是一种客观行为,被归类为称为 "子能力 "的主题领域(如急诊稳定)。里程碑评分标准的前提是,评分(等级)为 1.0 的是新入职的 EM-1 级住院医师,评分为 4.0 的是即将毕业的住院医师的 "目标评分"(尽管不是期望值)。本研究旨在确定即将毕业的住院医师获得目标里程碑评分的频率:这项回顾性横断面研究是对之前一项研究中使用的数据集进行的二次分析,但之前未曾报道过。我们分析了2022年4月25日至6月24日期间对处于培训最后一年的分类急诊科住院医师进行的里程碑次级能力评分。评分被二分为在项目完成时达到预期水平(评分≥3.5)和在项目完成时未达到预期水平(评分≤3.0)。我们计算了每个子能力未达到目标评分的住院医师人数:2022 年春季,在培训最后一年春季的 2637 名住院医师中,有 1613 人(61.2%)在每个子能力上都达到了≥3.5 的评分,有 1024 人(38.8%)至少在一个子能力上未达到该评分。有 250 名住院医师(9.5%)未能达到预期分能力评级的一半,有 105 名住院医师(4.0%)未能在每个分能力上达到预期评级(即评级≤3.0):结论:当使用3.5的EM里程碑评分阈值时,只有61.2%的医生达到了项目毕业的目标评分;4.0%的医生未能在任何里程碑子能力上达到目标评分;9.5%的医生未能在一半的子能力上达到住院医师毕业的目标评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信