Methadone Initiation in the Emergency Department for Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Daniel Wolfson, Roz King, Miles Lamberson, Jackson Lyttleton, Colin T Waters, Samantha H Schneider, Blake A Porter, Kyle M DeWitt, Peter Jackson, Martha W Stevens, John Brooklyn, Richard Rawson, Elly Riser
{"title":"Methadone Initiation in the Emergency Department for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Daniel Wolfson, Roz King, Miles Lamberson, Jackson Lyttleton, Colin T Waters, Samantha H Schneider, Blake A Porter, Kyle M DeWitt, Peter Jackson, Martha W Stevens, John Brooklyn, Richard Rawson, Elly Riser","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overdose deaths from high-potency synthetic opioids, including fentanyl and its analogs, continue to rise along with emergency department (ED) visits for complications of opioid use disorder (OUD). Fentanyl accumulates in adipose tissue; although rare, this increases the risk of precipitated withdrawal in patients upon buprenorphine initiation. Many EDs have implemented medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) programs using buprenorphine. However, few offer methadone, a proven therapy without the risk of precipitated withdrawal associated with buprenorphine initiation. We describe the addition of an ED-initiated methadone treatment pathway and compared its 72-hour follow-up outpatient treatment engagement rates to our existing ED-initiated buprenorphine MOUD program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We expanded our ED MOUD program with a methadone treatment pathway. From February 20-September 19, 2023, we screened 20,504 ED arrivals; 5.1% had signs of OUD. We enrolled 61 patients: 28 in the methadone; and 33 in the buprenorphine pathways. For patients who screened positive for opioid use, shared decision-making was employed to determine whether buprenorphine or methadone therapy was more appropriate. Patients in the methadone pathway received their first dose of up to 30 milligrams (mg) of methadone in the ED. Two additional methadone doses of up to 40 mg were dispensed at the time of the ED visit and held in the department, allowing patients to return each day for observed dosing until intake at an opioid treatment program (OTP). We compared 72-hour rates of outpatient follow-up treatment engagement at the OTP (for those on methadone) or at the addiction treatment center (ATC) (for those on buprenorphine) for the two treatment pathways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 28 patients enrolled in the methadone pathway, 12 (43%) successfully engaged in follow-up treatment at the OTP. Of the 33 patients enrolled in the buprenorphine pathway, 15 (45%) successfully engaged in follow-up treatment at the ATC (relative risk 1.06; 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methadone initiation in the ED to treat patients with OUD resulted in similar 72-hour follow-up outpatient treatment engagement rates compared to ED-buprenorphine initiation, providing another viable option for MOUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"668-674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Overdose deaths from high-potency synthetic opioids, including fentanyl and its analogs, continue to rise along with emergency department (ED) visits for complications of opioid use disorder (OUD). Fentanyl accumulates in adipose tissue; although rare, this increases the risk of precipitated withdrawal in patients upon buprenorphine initiation. Many EDs have implemented medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) programs using buprenorphine. However, few offer methadone, a proven therapy without the risk of precipitated withdrawal associated with buprenorphine initiation. We describe the addition of an ED-initiated methadone treatment pathway and compared its 72-hour follow-up outpatient treatment engagement rates to our existing ED-initiated buprenorphine MOUD program.

Methods: We expanded our ED MOUD program with a methadone treatment pathway. From February 20-September 19, 2023, we screened 20,504 ED arrivals; 5.1% had signs of OUD. We enrolled 61 patients: 28 in the methadone; and 33 in the buprenorphine pathways. For patients who screened positive for opioid use, shared decision-making was employed to determine whether buprenorphine or methadone therapy was more appropriate. Patients in the methadone pathway received their first dose of up to 30 milligrams (mg) of methadone in the ED. Two additional methadone doses of up to 40 mg were dispensed at the time of the ED visit and held in the department, allowing patients to return each day for observed dosing until intake at an opioid treatment program (OTP). We compared 72-hour rates of outpatient follow-up treatment engagement at the OTP (for those on methadone) or at the addiction treatment center (ATC) (for those on buprenorphine) for the two treatment pathways.

Results: Of the 28 patients enrolled in the methadone pathway, 12 (43%) successfully engaged in follow-up treatment at the OTP. Of the 33 patients enrolled in the buprenorphine pathway, 15 (45%) successfully engaged in follow-up treatment at the ATC (relative risk 1.06; 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.87).

Conclusion: Methadone initiation in the ED to treat patients with OUD resulted in similar 72-hour follow-up outpatient treatment engagement rates compared to ED-buprenorphine initiation, providing another viable option for MOUD.

急诊科美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。
导言:包括芬太尼及其类似物在内的高浓度合成阿片类药物导致的过量死亡人数持续上升,同时因阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)并发症而到急诊科(ED)就诊的人数也在增加。芬太尼会积聚在脂肪组织中;虽然这种情况很少见,但却增加了患者在开始使用丁丙诺啡后出现骤然戒断的风险。许多急诊室已经实施了使用丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的计划。然而,很少有医院提供美沙酮,因为美沙酮是一种行之有效的疗法,不会因开始使用丁丙诺啡而产生骤然戒断的风险。我们介绍了新增的由急诊室启动的美沙酮治疗途径,并将其 72 小时随访门诊治疗参与率与现有的由急诊室启动的丁丙诺啡 MOUD 项目进行了比较:我们扩大了 ED MOUD 项目,增加了美沙酮治疗途径。从 2023 年 2 月 20 日至 9 月 19 日,我们筛查了 20,504 名急诊室就诊者;其中 5.1% 有 OUD 的迹象。我们招募了 61 名患者:美沙酮治疗路径有 28 人,丁丙诺啡治疗路径有 33 人。对于阿片类药物使用筛查呈阳性的患者,我们采用了共同决策的方法来决定是使用丁丙诺啡还是美沙酮治疗更合适。美沙酮治疗方案的患者在急诊室接受了第一剂最多 30 毫克(mg)的美沙酮治疗。在急诊室就诊时,会再发放两剂最高达 40 毫克的美沙酮,并将其保存在急诊室,这样患者就可以每天返回急诊室观察服药情况,直到阿片类药物治疗项目(OTP)收治为止。我们比较了两种治疗途径的患者在 OTP(服用美沙酮者)或戒毒治疗中心 (ATC) (服用丁丙诺啡者)接受门诊后续治疗 72 小时的参与率:在 28 名参加美沙酮治疗方案的患者中,有 12 人(43%)成功参加了 OTP 的后续治疗。在33名接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者中,15人(45%)成功接受了ATC的后续治疗(相对风险为1.06;95%置信区间为0.60-1.87):结论:在急诊室开始使用美沙酮治疗 OUD 患者与在急诊室开始使用丁丙诺啡治疗 OUD 患者的 72 小时后续门诊治疗参与率相似,为 MOUD 提供了另一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信