New guidelines for the effectiveness of exercise in the prevention of dementia: Implications for psychiatry.

Q3 Medicine
Nikos Christodoulou, Andreas Lappas, Olga Karpenko, Rodrigo Ramalho, Myrto Samara, Marco Solmi, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Nicola Veronese
{"title":"New guidelines for the effectiveness of exercise in the prevention of dementia: Implications for psychiatry.","authors":"Nikos Christodoulou, Andreas Lappas, Olga Karpenko, Rodrigo Ramalho, Myrto Samara, Marco Solmi, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Nicola Veronese","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2024.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To the Editors, We recently published evidence-based guidelines for the role of exercise in the prevention of dementia.1 The guidelines combined an umbrella review and expert consensus, and has important implications for psychiatry. Evidence from published studies was evaluated using the GRADE assessment. We found scarce and relatively low-quality evidence in the literature, particularly for the primary prevention of dementia. Our GRADE-informed evidence synthesis yielded the following conclusions: For Primary prevention of dementia: Physical activity may be considered for the primary prevention of dementia. In people without dementia or MCI, exercise may be no better than health education for the primary prevention of dementia and MCI.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>Very low for physical activity; very low for exercise. For Secondary prevention of dementia: In people with MCI there is continued uncertainty about the role of physical activity and exercise in slowing the conversion to dementia.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>Very low for physical activity; very low for exercise. For Tertiary prevention of dementia: In people with moderate dementia, physical activity/exercise could be considered for maintaining cognition and exercise could be considered for stabilizing disability compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Quality of evidence: </strong>Exercise: very low for cognitive outcomes; low for disability. Following a consensus process, we recommended physical activity/exercise for all three purposes, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention (improve cognition and reduce disability) of dementia. The recommendation of exercise was largely contingent on its positive effects on mental health,2,3 in conjunction with the extensive body of evidence linking mental disorder with dementia.4 The guidelines highlight the need for further research on multidisciplinary interventions for both the primary and secondary prevention of dementia. A question remains whether the positive effect of physical activity on mood/behaviour applies to the MCI group, as it does to the dementia group. More research is required in people with established dementia and in less common forms of dementia. The guidelines also make an implicit research recommendation in support of heurism, in the sense that they integrate the evidence-based expectation that exercise is likely to be beneficial both for mental and physical health. Indeed, employing heurism may be inherently necessary in prevention research.5 Overall, these guidelines offer an evidence-based insight into the effectiveness of physical activity/exercise for the prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) of dementia. Importantly, they necessitate the inclusion of mental health in a multi-component approach. In doing so, they emphasize the necessity of mental health promotion and mental illness prevention in the prevention and management of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2024.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To the Editors, We recently published evidence-based guidelines for the role of exercise in the prevention of dementia.1 The guidelines combined an umbrella review and expert consensus, and has important implications for psychiatry. Evidence from published studies was evaluated using the GRADE assessment. We found scarce and relatively low-quality evidence in the literature, particularly for the primary prevention of dementia. Our GRADE-informed evidence synthesis yielded the following conclusions: For Primary prevention of dementia: Physical activity may be considered for the primary prevention of dementia. In people without dementia or MCI, exercise may be no better than health education for the primary prevention of dementia and MCI.

Quality of evidence: Very low for physical activity; very low for exercise. For Secondary prevention of dementia: In people with MCI there is continued uncertainty about the role of physical activity and exercise in slowing the conversion to dementia.

Quality of evidence: Very low for physical activity; very low for exercise. For Tertiary prevention of dementia: In people with moderate dementia, physical activity/exercise could be considered for maintaining cognition and exercise could be considered for stabilizing disability compared to usual care.

Quality of evidence: Exercise: very low for cognitive outcomes; low for disability. Following a consensus process, we recommended physical activity/exercise for all three purposes, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention (improve cognition and reduce disability) of dementia. The recommendation of exercise was largely contingent on its positive effects on mental health,2,3 in conjunction with the extensive body of evidence linking mental disorder with dementia.4 The guidelines highlight the need for further research on multidisciplinary interventions for both the primary and secondary prevention of dementia. A question remains whether the positive effect of physical activity on mood/behaviour applies to the MCI group, as it does to the dementia group. More research is required in people with established dementia and in less common forms of dementia. The guidelines also make an implicit research recommendation in support of heurism, in the sense that they integrate the evidence-based expectation that exercise is likely to be beneficial both for mental and physical health. Indeed, employing heurism may be inherently necessary in prevention research.5 Overall, these guidelines offer an evidence-based insight into the effectiveness of physical activity/exercise for the prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) of dementia. Importantly, they necessitate the inclusion of mental health in a multi-component approach. In doing so, they emphasize the necessity of mental health promotion and mental illness prevention in the prevention and management of dementia.

运动预防痴呆症有效性的新指南:对精神病学的影响。
致编辑:我们最近发布了关于运动在预防痴呆症中的作用的循证指南1。该指南结合了总综述和专家共识,对精神病学具有重要意义。我们采用 GRADE 评估方法对已发表研究的证据进行了评估。我们发现文献中的证据很少,而且质量相对较低,尤其是在痴呆症的一级预防方面。我们在 GRADE 的基础上对证据进行了综合,得出以下结论:痴呆症的初级预防:在痴呆症的初级预防中,可以考虑进行体育锻炼。对于没有痴呆症或 MCI 的人来说,在痴呆症和 MCI 的一级预防方面,运动可能并不比健康教育更好:体力活动的证据质量很低;运动的证据质量很低。痴呆症的二级预防:对于 MCI 患者,体育锻炼和运动在延缓痴呆症转化方面的作用仍然存在不确定性:体育锻炼的证据质量很低;运动的证据质量很低。痴呆症的三级预防:与常规护理相比,对于中度痴呆症患者,可考虑通过体育锻炼来维持认知能力,通过运动来稳定残疾程度:运动:对认知结果的影响很低;对残疾的影响很低。在达成共识后,我们建议将体育锻炼用于痴呆症的一级、二级和三级预防(改善认知和减少残疾)。推荐运动主要是考虑到运动对心理健康的积极影响,2,3 以及大量证据表明精神障碍与痴呆症之间的联系。4 指南强调,有必要进一步研究痴呆症一级和二级预防的多学科干预措施。体育锻炼对情绪/行为的积极影响是否适用于 MCI 组,是否也适用于痴呆症组,这仍然是一个问题。需要对已确诊的痴呆症患者和不太常见的痴呆症进行更多的研究。指南还提出了一项支持启发式的隐含研究建议,即把运动可能有益于身心健康这一基于证据的预期结合在一起。事实上,在预防研究中采用启发式方法可能是固有的必要之举。5 总体而言,这些指南以证据为基础,深入分析了体育活动/运动对预防(一级、二级和三级)痴呆症的有效性。重要的是,这些指南要求将心理健康纳入多成分方法中。因此,指南强调了在痴呆症的预防和管理中促进心理健康和预防精神疾病的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信