Optimizing Intraflap Anastomosis of Conjoined Bilateral DIEP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Planning, Execution, and Outcomes in 201 Patients.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011770
Ju Hee Kim, Kyeong-Tae Lee, Goo-Hyun Mun
{"title":"Optimizing Intraflap Anastomosis of Conjoined Bilateral DIEP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Planning, Execution, and Outcomes in 201 Patients.","authors":"Ju Hee Kim, Kyeong-Tae Lee, Goo-Hyun Mun","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conjoined bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap with intraflap anastomosis is an efficient approach for breast reconstruction, enabling the use of almost the entire abdominal tissue. Variations in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) anatomy may make it challenging to apply this technique consistently. This study aimed to derive optimal strategies for achieving reliable conjoined bilateral DIEP flap with intraflap anastomosis universally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For all consecutive patients undergoing conjoined bilateral DIEP flap-based breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2023, preoperative planning and intraoperative execution for the pedicle configurations were reviewed. Their postoperative outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 201 patients were included, with no cases requiring conversion to extraflap anastomosis. In preoperative planning, candidates for recipient vessels for intraflap anastomosis were typically selected on the basis of DIEA branching patterns, identified through computed tomographic angiography: type 1 (single trunk) prioritizing the superior continuation, type 2 (2 main trunks) considering a side branch, and type 3 (3 main trunks) favoring the first bifurcating branch. Comparing candidates from bilateral DIEA, the primary pedicle was determined, providing larger recipient vessels. Most cases followed the planned approach smoothly; however, 28 required intraoperative changes, mostly aimed at securing larger recipients by changing the primary pedicle or harvesting more caudally located perforators to obtain larger superior continuations. Four perfusion-related complications developed, which were resolved successfully without flap failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors' results suggest an efficient strategy for securing a reliable recipient vessel, tailored to patient anatomy, in conjoined bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction with intraflap anastomosis, leading to achieving optimal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"608-616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conjoined bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap with intraflap anastomosis is an efficient approach for breast reconstruction, enabling the use of almost the entire abdominal tissue. Variations in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) anatomy may make it challenging to apply this technique consistently. This study aimed to derive optimal strategies for achieving reliable conjoined bilateral DIEP flap with intraflap anastomosis universally.

Methods: For all consecutive patients undergoing conjoined bilateral DIEP flap-based breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2023, preoperative planning and intraoperative execution for the pedicle configurations were reviewed. Their postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

Results: In total, 201 patients were included, with no cases requiring conversion to extraflap anastomosis. In preoperative planning, candidates for recipient vessels for intraflap anastomosis were typically selected on the basis of DIEA branching patterns, identified through computed tomographic angiography: type 1 (single trunk) prioritizing the superior continuation, type 2 (2 main trunks) considering a side branch, and type 3 (3 main trunks) favoring the first bifurcating branch. Comparing candidates from bilateral DIEA, the primary pedicle was determined, providing larger recipient vessels. Most cases followed the planned approach smoothly; however, 28 required intraoperative changes, mostly aimed at securing larger recipients by changing the primary pedicle or harvesting more caudally located perforators to obtain larger superior continuations. Four perfusion-related complications developed, which were resolved successfully without flap failure.

Conclusion: The authors' results suggest an efficient strategy for securing a reliable recipient vessel, tailored to patient anatomy, in conjoined bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction with intraflap anastomosis, leading to achieving optimal outcomes.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

优化乳房重建双侧 DIEP 皮瓣的瓣内吻合:201例患者的计划、执行和结果。
背景:带瓣内吻合的双侧下腹穿孔带(DIEP)皮瓣是一种有效的乳房重建方法,几乎可以利用整个腹部组织。双侧上腹部穿孔器解剖结构的差异可能会使这项技术的应用具有挑战性。本研究旨在得出最佳策略,以实现可靠的双侧DIEP瓣内吻合:方法:对2009年至2023年期间所有连续接受基于连体双侧DIEP皮瓣乳房重建术的患者进行回顾性分析,回顾性分析术前计划和术中执行的瓣蒂配置。结果:结果:共纳入 201 例患者,其中无一例需要转为皮瓣外吻合。在术前计划中,通常根据计算机断层扫描血管造影确定的DIEA分支模式选择皮瓣内吻合的受体血管候选者;I型(单主干)优先考虑上部延续,II型(双主干)考虑侧支,III型(三主干)优先考虑第一分叉支。对比双侧 DIEA 候选者,确定主干,提供更大的受体血管。大多数病例都能按照计划顺利进行,但也有28例需要在术中进行改动,主要目的是通过改变主蒂或采集更多位于尾部的穿孔器来获得更大的上部连续血管,从而确保更大的受体。出现了四例灌注相关并发症,这些并发症都得到了成功解决,没有出现皮瓣失败:我们的研究结果表明,在进行双侧DIEP皮瓣乳房重建与皮瓣内吻合术时,可根据患者的解剖结构采取有效策略,确保受区血管的可靠性,从而获得最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信