{"title":"Modified McKissock Technique for Secondary Breast Reduction: A Prospective Study on Safety and Surgical and Aesthetic Outcomes.","authors":"Sandra Feldler, Maximilian Zaussinger, Gudrun Ehebruster, Kathrin Bachleitner, Theresia Steinkellner, Manfred Schmidt","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Secondary breast reductions are increasingly being performed, but they are potentially associated with higher complication rates than primary mammaplasty. Necrosis of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is a devastating complication that can occur after repeated NAC transposition, particularly when the initially used pedicle is unknown. Thus, the authors established a modification of the McKissock technique for secondary breast reductions including 3 pedicle components to ensure safe vascular supply of the NAC. The presented technique incorporates a superior and inferior dermoglandular pedicle, according to the McKissock technique, and an additional central pedicle. The technique was applied for secondary breast reduction in a series of 25 breasts (14 patients: 11 bilateral, 3 unilateral). Complication rates, preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q scores, and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated. Mean resection weight was 299 g (range, 40 to 646 g), and the NAC was transposed by 4.2 cm on average (range, 1 to 10 cm). No case of NAC necrosis was observed, and comparison of preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q values indicated substantial improvement in all domains. After surgery, 84.6% of patients reported excellent satisfaction with breast appearance. According to these results, the modified McKissock technique is safe for patients requiring secondary breast reduction, even if the primarily used pedicle is unknown. The established technique is associated with improved postoperative patient-reported outcomes and yields aesthetically favorable results.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"670e-675e"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Summary: Secondary breast reductions are increasingly being performed, but they are potentially associated with higher complication rates than primary mammaplasty. Necrosis of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is a devastating complication that can occur after repeated NAC transposition, particularly when the initially used pedicle is unknown. Thus, the authors established a modification of the McKissock technique for secondary breast reductions including 3 pedicle components to ensure safe vascular supply of the NAC. The presented technique incorporates a superior and inferior dermoglandular pedicle, according to the McKissock technique, and an additional central pedicle. The technique was applied for secondary breast reduction in a series of 25 breasts (14 patients: 11 bilateral, 3 unilateral). Complication rates, preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q scores, and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated. Mean resection weight was 299 g (range, 40 to 646 g), and the NAC was transposed by 4.2 cm on average (range, 1 to 10 cm). No case of NAC necrosis was observed, and comparison of preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q values indicated substantial improvement in all domains. After surgery, 84.6% of patients reported excellent satisfaction with breast appearance. According to these results, the modified McKissock technique is safe for patients requiring secondary breast reduction, even if the primarily used pedicle is unknown. The established technique is associated with improved postoperative patient-reported outcomes and yields aesthetically favorable results.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.