Performance evaluation of image co-registration methods in photoacoustic mesoscopy of the vasculature.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Thierry L Lefebvre, Paul W Sweeney, Janek Grohl, Lina Hacker, Emma L Brown, Thomas R Else, Mariam-Eleni Oraiopoulou, Algernon Bloom, David Y Lewis, Sarah E Bohndiek
{"title":"Performance evaluation of image co-registration methods in photoacoustic mesoscopy of the vasculature.","authors":"Thierry L Lefebvre, Paul W Sweeney, Janek Grohl, Lina Hacker, Emma L Brown, Thomas R Else, Mariam-Eleni Oraiopoulou, Algernon Bloom, David Y Lewis, Sarah E Bohndiek","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad7fc7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b>The formation of functional vasculature in solid tumours enables delivery of oxygen and nutrients, and is vital for effective treatment with chemotherapeutic agents. Longitudinal characterisation of vascular networks can be enabled using mesoscopic photoacoustic imaging, but requires accurate image co-registration to precisely assess local changes across disease development or in response to therapy. Co-registration in photoacoustic imaging is challenging due to the complex nature of the generated signal, including the sparsity of data, artefacts related to the illumination/detection geometry, scan-to-scan technical variability, and biological variability, such as transient changes in perfusion. To better inform the choice of co-registration algorithms, we compared five open-source methods, in physiological and pathological tissues, with the aim of aligning evolving vascular networks in tumours imaged over growth at different time-points.<b>Approach:</b>Co-registration techniques were applied to 3D vascular images acquired with photoacoustic mesoscopy from murine ears and breast cancer patient-derived xenografts, at a fixed time-point and longitudinally. Images were pre-processed and segmented using an unsupervised generative adversarial network. To compare co-registration quality in different settings, pairs of fixed and moving intensity images and/or segmentations were fed into five methods split into the following categories: affine intensity-based using 1)mutual information (MI) or 2)normalised cross-correlation (NCC) as optimisation metrics, affine shape-based using 3)NCC applied to distance-transformed segmentations or 4)iterative closest point algorithm, and deformable weakly supervised deep learning-based using 5)LocalNet co-registration. Percent-changes in Dice coefficients, surface distances, MI, structural similarity index measure and target registration errors were evaluated.<b>Main results:</b>Co-registration using MI or NCC provided similar alignment performance, better than shape-based methods. LocalNet provided accurate co-registration of substructures by optimising subfield deformation throughout the volumes, outperforming other methods, especially in the longitudinal breast cancer xenograft dataset by minimising target registration errors.<b>Significance:</b>We showed the feasibility of co-registering repeatedly or longitudinally imaged vascular networks in photoacoustic mesoscopy, taking a step towards longitudinal quantitative characterisation of these complex structures. These tools open new outlooks for monitoring tumour angiogenesis at the meso-scale and for quantifying treatment-induced co-localised alterations in the vasculature.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad7fc7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:The formation of functional vasculature in solid tumours enables delivery of oxygen and nutrients, and is vital for effective treatment with chemotherapeutic agents. Longitudinal characterisation of vascular networks can be enabled using mesoscopic photoacoustic imaging, but requires accurate image co-registration to precisely assess local changes across disease development or in response to therapy. Co-registration in photoacoustic imaging is challenging due to the complex nature of the generated signal, including the sparsity of data, artefacts related to the illumination/detection geometry, scan-to-scan technical variability, and biological variability, such as transient changes in perfusion. To better inform the choice of co-registration algorithms, we compared five open-source methods, in physiological and pathological tissues, with the aim of aligning evolving vascular networks in tumours imaged over growth at different time-points.Approach:Co-registration techniques were applied to 3D vascular images acquired with photoacoustic mesoscopy from murine ears and breast cancer patient-derived xenografts, at a fixed time-point and longitudinally. Images were pre-processed and segmented using an unsupervised generative adversarial network. To compare co-registration quality in different settings, pairs of fixed and moving intensity images and/or segmentations were fed into five methods split into the following categories: affine intensity-based using 1)mutual information (MI) or 2)normalised cross-correlation (NCC) as optimisation metrics, affine shape-based using 3)NCC applied to distance-transformed segmentations or 4)iterative closest point algorithm, and deformable weakly supervised deep learning-based using 5)LocalNet co-registration. Percent-changes in Dice coefficients, surface distances, MI, structural similarity index measure and target registration errors were evaluated.Main results:Co-registration using MI or NCC provided similar alignment performance, better than shape-based methods. LocalNet provided accurate co-registration of substructures by optimising subfield deformation throughout the volumes, outperforming other methods, especially in the longitudinal breast cancer xenograft dataset by minimising target registration errors.Significance:We showed the feasibility of co-registering repeatedly or longitudinally imaged vascular networks in photoacoustic mesoscopy, taking a step towards longitudinal quantitative characterisation of these complex structures. These tools open new outlooks for monitoring tumour angiogenesis at the meso-scale and for quantifying treatment-induced co-localised alterations in the vasculature.

血管光声中视镜图像共聚方法的性能评估。
目的:实体瘤中功能性血管的形成有助于氧气和营养物质的输送,对化疗药物的有效治疗至关重要。血管网络的纵向特征可通过介观光声成像来实现,但需要精确的图像配准,才能准确评估疾病发展过程中或治疗反应中的局部变化。由于生成信号的复杂性,包括数据的稀疏性、与照明/检测几何形状有关的伪影、扫描与扫描之间的技术变异性以及生物变异性(如灌注的瞬时变化),光声成像中的共配准具有挑战性。为了更好地选择联合注册算法,我们在生理和病理组织中比较了五种开源方法,目的是在不同的时间点对肿瘤生长过程中成像的不断变化的血管网络进行对齐。方法:联合注册技术应用于鼠耳和乳腺癌患者异种移植物的光声介孔镜获取的三维血管图像,在固定时间点纵向进行。使用无监督生成对抗网络对图像进行预处理和分割。为了比较不同设置下的协同注册质量,固定和移动强度图像和/或分割对被输入到五种方法中,这些方法分为以下几类:基于仿射强度的方法,使用 1)互信息(MI)或 2)归一化交叉相关(NCC)作为优化指标;基于仿射形状的方法,使用 3)应用于距离变换分割的 NCC 或 4)迭代最近点算法;以及基于可变形弱监督深度学习的方法,使用 5)LocalNet 协同注册。主要结果:使用 MI 或 NCC 的协同注册提供了相似的配准性能,优于基于形状的方法。重要意义:我们展示了在光声介孔镜中对重复或纵向成像的血管网络进行共配准的可行性,为这些复杂结构的纵向定量特征描述迈出了一步。这些工具为在中尺度上监测肿瘤血管生成和量化治疗引起的血管共定位改变开辟了新的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信