Dobutamine stress echocardiography after positive CCTA: diagnostic performance using fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio as reference standards.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Anders Tjellaug Bråten, Espen Holte, Rune Wiseth, Svend Aakhus
{"title":"Dobutamine stress echocardiography after positive CCTA: diagnostic performance using fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio as reference standards.","authors":"Anders Tjellaug Bråten, Espen Holte, Rune Wiseth, Svend Aakhus","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in symptomatic patients with a low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a positive coronary CT angiography (CCTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 104 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for symptoms of stable CAD and a CCTA indicative of obstructive CAD. The diagnostic performance of DSE was evaluated against two intracoronary pressure indices: (a) fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.80 and (b) instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.89, indicating haemodynamically significant stenoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 102 patients, 46 (45%) had at least one significant lesion as defined by FFR, as did 37 (36%) as defined by iFR. DSE showed positive results in 33% (34/102) of cases. The discriminative power of DSE for detecting significant CAD was moderate, with areas under the curve of 0.63 (p=0.024) compared with FFR and 0.64 (p=0.025) compared with iFR. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of DSE were, respectively, 61%, 43%, and 75% against FFR, and 64%, 46% and 74% against iFR. The diagnostic accuracy of DSE did not differ significantly between FFR and iFR as a reference (p=0.549).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with positive CCTA, DSE has a moderate ability to identify haemodynamically significant CAD, with low sensitivity and moderate specificity. When assessed against FFR and iFR criteria, its additive diagnostic value is limited in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive CAD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03045601.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in symptomatic patients with a low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a positive coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 104 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for symptoms of stable CAD and a CCTA indicative of obstructive CAD. The diagnostic performance of DSE was evaluated against two intracoronary pressure indices: (a) fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.80 and (b) instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.89, indicating haemodynamically significant stenoses.

Results: Of 102 patients, 46 (45%) had at least one significant lesion as defined by FFR, as did 37 (36%) as defined by iFR. DSE showed positive results in 33% (34/102) of cases. The discriminative power of DSE for detecting significant CAD was moderate, with areas under the curve of 0.63 (p=0.024) compared with FFR and 0.64 (p=0.025) compared with iFR. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of DSE were, respectively, 61%, 43%, and 75% against FFR, and 64%, 46% and 74% against iFR. The diagnostic accuracy of DSE did not differ significantly between FFR and iFR as a reference (p=0.549).

Conclusion: In patients with positive CCTA, DSE has a moderate ability to identify haemodynamically significant CAD, with low sensitivity and moderate specificity. When assessed against FFR and iFR criteria, its additive diagnostic value is limited in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive CAD.

Trial registration number: NCT03045601.

CCTA 阳性后的多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图:以分数血流储备和瞬时无波比值为参考标准的诊断性能。
目的:评估多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)对阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)预检概率为中低且冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)阳性的无症状患者的诊断准确性:我们前瞻性地招募了 104 名连续接受冠状动脉造影术的患者,这些患者的症状为稳定型 CAD,CCTA 显示为阻塞性 CAD。对照两个冠状动脉内压指数评估了 DSE 的诊断性能:(a) 分形血流储备(FFR),临界值≤0.80;(b) 瞬时无波比(iFR),临界值≤0.89,表明血流动力学上有显著狭窄:102 名患者中,46 人(45%)至少有一个 FFR 界定的重大病变,37 人(36%)有 iFR 界定的重大病变。在 33% 的病例(34/102)中,DSE 显示了阳性结果。与 FFR 相比,DSE 对检测明显的 CAD 的鉴别力为 0.63(p=0.024),与 iFR 相比,DSE 的曲线下面积为 0.64(p=0.025),属于中等水平。与 FFR 相比,DSE 的准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为 61%、43% 和 75%;与 iFR 相比,DSE 的准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为 64%、46% 和 74%。DSE的诊断准确性在FFR和作为参考的iFR之间没有明显差异(P=0.549):结论:对于 CCTA 呈阳性的患者,DSE 识别血流动力学显著性 CAD 的能力一般,敏感性较低,特异性适中。对照 FFR 和 iFR 标准进行评估时,对于检测前阻塞性 CAD 可能性处于中低水平的患者,DSE 的附加诊断价值有限:试验注册号:NCT03045601。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信