Machine Learning Based Prediction of Imminent ICP Insults During Neurocritical Care of Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02119-7
Peter Galos, Ludvig Hult, Dave Zachariah, Anders Lewén, Anders Hånell, Timothy Howells, Thomas B Schön, Per Enblad
{"title":"Machine Learning Based Prediction of Imminent ICP Insults During Neurocritical Care of Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Peter Galos, Ludvig Hult, Dave Zachariah, Anders Lewén, Anders Hånell, Timothy Howells, Thomas B Schön, Per Enblad","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02119-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In neurointensive care, increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a feared secondary brain insult in traumatic brain injury (TBI). A system that predicts ICP insults before they emerge may facilitate early optimization of the physiology, which may in turn lead to stopping the predicted ICP insult from occurring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different artificial intelligence models in predicting the risk of ICP insults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The models were trained to predict risk of ICP insults starting within 30 min, using the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset. A restricted dataset consisting of only monitoring data were used, and an unrestricted dataset using monitoring data as well as clinical data, demographic data, and radiological evaluations was used. Four different model classes were compared: Gaussian process regression, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and Extreme Gradient Boosted decision trees (XGBoost).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and two patients with TBI were included (total monitoring 138,411 h). On the task of predicting upcoming ICP insults, the Gaussian process regression model performed similarly on the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset (sensitivity 93.2%, specificity 93.9%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98.3%), as in earlier smaller studies. Using a more flexible model (XGBoost) resulted in a comparable performance (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 94.6%, AUROC 98.7%). Adding more clinical variables and features further improved the performance of the models slightly (XGBoost: sensitivity 94.1%, specificity of 94.6%, AUROC 98.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial intelligence models have potential to become valuable tools for predicting ICP insults in advance during neurointensive care. The fact that common off-the-shelf models, such as XGBoost, performed well in predicting ICP insults opens new possibilities that can lead to faster advances in the field and earlier clinical implementations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"387-397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02119-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In neurointensive care, increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a feared secondary brain insult in traumatic brain injury (TBI). A system that predicts ICP insults before they emerge may facilitate early optimization of the physiology, which may in turn lead to stopping the predicted ICP insult from occurring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different artificial intelligence models in predicting the risk of ICP insults.

Methods: The models were trained to predict risk of ICP insults starting within 30 min, using the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset. A restricted dataset consisting of only monitoring data were used, and an unrestricted dataset using monitoring data as well as clinical data, demographic data, and radiological evaluations was used. Four different model classes were compared: Gaussian process regression, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and Extreme Gradient Boosted decision trees (XGBoost).

Results: Six hundred and two patients with TBI were included (total monitoring 138,411 h). On the task of predicting upcoming ICP insults, the Gaussian process regression model performed similarly on the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset (sensitivity 93.2%, specificity 93.9%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98.3%), as in earlier smaller studies. Using a more flexible model (XGBoost) resulted in a comparable performance (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 94.6%, AUROC 98.7%). Adding more clinical variables and features further improved the performance of the models slightly (XGBoost: sensitivity 94.1%, specificity of 94.6%, AUROC 98.8%).

Conclusions: Artificial intelligence models have potential to become valuable tools for predicting ICP insults in advance during neurointensive care. The fact that common off-the-shelf models, such as XGBoost, performed well in predicting ICP insults opens new possibilities that can lead to faster advances in the field and earlier clinical implementations.

基于机器学习的创伤性脑损伤神经重症监护期间 ICP 潜在损伤预测。
背景:在神经重症监护中,颅内压(ICP)升高是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中令人担忧的继发性脑损伤。在ICP损伤出现之前就能预测其发生的系统可促进生理机能的早期优化,进而阻止预测的ICP损伤的发生。本研究旨在评估不同人工智能模型在预测 ICP 损伤风险方面的性能:方法:使用乌普萨拉高频率创伤性脑损伤数据集训练模型,以预测 30 分钟内开始的 ICP 损伤风险。使用的限制性数据集仅包括监测数据,而非限制性数据集则包括监测数据以及临床数据、人口统计学数据和放射学评估。比较了四个不同的模型类别:高斯过程回归、逻辑回归、随机森林分类器和极端梯度提升决策树(XGBoost):共纳入了 602 名创伤性脑损伤患者(总监护时间 138,411 小时)。在预测即将发生的 ICP 损伤方面,高斯过程回归模型在乌普萨拉高频 TBI 数据集上的表现与早期的小型研究类似(灵敏度 93.2%,特异性 93.9%,接收者操作特征曲线下面积 [AUROC] 98.3%)。使用更灵活的模型(XGBoost)也取得了不相上下的效果(灵敏度 93.8%,特异性 94.6%,接受者操作特征曲线下面积 98.7%)。添加更多临床变量和特征后,模型的性能略有提高(XGBoost:灵敏度 94.1%,特异性 94.6%,AUROC 98.8%):人工智能模型有望成为神经重症监护期间提前预测 ICP 损伤的重要工具。XGBoost 等常见的现成模型在预测 ICP 损伤方面表现出色,这一事实开辟了新的可能性,可加快该领域的发展并更早地应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信