Effect of tibia-first, restricted functional alignment technique on gap width changes, and component positioning in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Hong Y Yang, Jae H Cheon, Sung J Kang, Jong K Seon
{"title":"Effect of tibia-first, restricted functional alignment technique on gap width changes, and component positioning in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Hong Y Yang, Jae H Cheon, Sung J Kang, Jong K Seon","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to quantitatively assess the predictability of post-resection gap dimensions and the attainment of balanced gaps using robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted TKA for knee osteoarthritis using a restricted functional alignment (FA) technique. Tibial cuts were performed based on preoperative tibial anatomy within predefined boundaries, followed by femoral component adjustments according to tensioned soft tissues to optimise gap balance. The primary outcome was the proportion of balanced gaps, defined as differential laxities of ≤2 mm, across extension, flexion, lateral, and medial gap measurements. Ligament balancing in lateral and medial compartments was assessed using a robotic system at 10° and 90° flexion to evaluate if restricted FA facilitated a balanced knee. Secondary outcomes included implant alignment, resection depth, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant increases in both lateral and medial gaps at 10° and 90° flexion were observed following tibial and femoral bone resections (p < 0.001). At extension, average gap changes were 0.9 mm (lateral) and 1.6 mm (medial) after tibial cuts, and 0.5 mm (lateral) and 1.2 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. At 90° flexion, changes were 0.3 mm (lateral) and 1.7 mm (medial) following tibial cuts, and 1.0 mm (lateral) and 1.4 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. Despite these variations, the tibia-first, gap-balancing technique achieved overall balance in 98% of gap measurements. The tibial component was placed at an average of 2.1° varus, while the femoral component was positioned at 0.3° varus and 1.3° external rotation relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Significant improvements in PROMs were noted between preoperative and one-year postoperative evaluations (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tibia-first, restricted FA technique achieved a well-balanced knee in 98% of cases, despite inconsistent gap increments observed between initial assessments and post-resection.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to quantitatively assess the predictability of post-resection gap dimensions and the attainment of balanced gaps using robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted TKA for knee osteoarthritis using a restricted functional alignment (FA) technique. Tibial cuts were performed based on preoperative tibial anatomy within predefined boundaries, followed by femoral component adjustments according to tensioned soft tissues to optimise gap balance. The primary outcome was the proportion of balanced gaps, defined as differential laxities of ≤2 mm, across extension, flexion, lateral, and medial gap measurements. Ligament balancing in lateral and medial compartments was assessed using a robotic system at 10° and 90° flexion to evaluate if restricted FA facilitated a balanced knee. Secondary outcomes included implant alignment, resection depth, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Results: Significant increases in both lateral and medial gaps at 10° and 90° flexion were observed following tibial and femoral bone resections (p < 0.001). At extension, average gap changes were 0.9 mm (lateral) and 1.6 mm (medial) after tibial cuts, and 0.5 mm (lateral) and 1.2 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. At 90° flexion, changes were 0.3 mm (lateral) and 1.7 mm (medial) following tibial cuts, and 1.0 mm (lateral) and 1.4 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. Despite these variations, the tibia-first, gap-balancing technique achieved overall balance in 98% of gap measurements. The tibial component was placed at an average of 2.1° varus, while the femoral component was positioned at 0.3° varus and 1.3° external rotation relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Significant improvements in PROMs were noted between preoperative and one-year postoperative evaluations (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The tibia-first, restricted FA technique achieved a well-balanced knee in 98% of cases, despite inconsistent gap increments observed between initial assessments and post-resection.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV.

机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术中胫骨先行、限制性功能对位技术对间隙宽度变化和组件定位的影响。
目的:本研究旨在定量评估机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)切除后间隙尺寸的可预测性以及间隙平衡的实现情况:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了100名连续接受机械臂辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的患者,采用的是限制性功能对位(FA)技术。根据术前胫骨解剖结构,在预定边界内进行胫骨切割,然后根据张力软组织调整股骨组件,以优化间隙平衡。主要结果是间隙平衡的比例,即在伸展、屈曲、外侧和内侧间隙测量中,间隙松弛差≤2毫米。使用机器人系统在屈曲10°和90°时评估外侧和内侧的韧带平衡情况,以评估受限的FA是否有利于膝关节的平衡。次要结果包括植入物对齐、切除深度和患者报告结果指标(PROMs):结果:胫骨和股骨切除后,10°和90°屈曲时外侧和内侧间隙均显著增加(P<0.05):胫骨先行、限制性FA技术在98%的病例中实现了良好的膝关节平衡,尽管在初始评估和切除后观察到的间隙增量不一致:证据级别:治疗级别 IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信