The Impact of Surgical Margin in Wide Local Excision of Pediatric Melanoma - An Argument for a More Conservative Approach.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Anthony V Basta, Connor D Fritz, Yi-Ju Chiang, Neha Malik, Lily Koscielniak, Lauren Mayon, Cynthia E Herzog, Mary T Austin
{"title":"The Impact of Surgical Margin in Wide Local Excision of Pediatric Melanoma - An Argument for a More Conservative Approach.","authors":"Anthony V Basta, Connor D Fritz, Yi-Ju Chiang, Neha Malik, Lily Koscielniak, Lauren Mayon, Cynthia E Herzog, Mary T Austin","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric melanoma is the most common skin cancer in children. Achieving surgical margins recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for wide local excision (WLE) is challenging in children with less body domain. This study investigated whether surgical margin impacted postoperative clinical outcomes following WLE for melanoma in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients ≤21 years undergoing WLE between 2007 and 2023 were analyzed. Patients were categorized in groups of surgical margin <2 cm vs. ≥2 cm. The chi-square test/Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association of age and tumor location with surgical margin group and whether NCCN guidelines for WLE were met.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 59 patients included, 61% had WLE with <2 cm margins. Head/neck melanomas were less likely to have margins ≥2 cm (OR = 0.121, 95% CI 0.022-0.648, p = 0.014) and margins that met the NCCN guidelines (OR = 0.002, 95% CI 0.003-0.215, p < 0.001) when compared to trunk/extremity primaries. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications or need for intervention for complications between patients with margins <2 cm and those with ≥2 cm. No patients experienced local recurrence with a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR: 16 to 93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric head/neck melanomas undergoing WLE were likelier to have narrow margins <2 cm and less likely to meet NCCN criteria. Narrow margins may achieve excellent results for pediatric melanoma patients.</p><p><strong>Type of study: </strong>This is a treatment study.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>This is a Level III retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"161897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric melanoma is the most common skin cancer in children. Achieving surgical margins recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for wide local excision (WLE) is challenging in children with less body domain. This study investigated whether surgical margin impacted postoperative clinical outcomes following WLE for melanoma in children and adolescents.

Methods: All patients ≤21 years undergoing WLE between 2007 and 2023 were analyzed. Patients were categorized in groups of surgical margin <2 cm vs. ≥2 cm. The chi-square test/Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association of age and tumor location with surgical margin group and whether NCCN guidelines for WLE were met.

Results: Of the 59 patients included, 61% had WLE with <2 cm margins. Head/neck melanomas were less likely to have margins ≥2 cm (OR = 0.121, 95% CI 0.022-0.648, p = 0.014) and margins that met the NCCN guidelines (OR = 0.002, 95% CI 0.003-0.215, p < 0.001) when compared to trunk/extremity primaries. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications or need for intervention for complications between patients with margins <2 cm and those with ≥2 cm. No patients experienced local recurrence with a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR: 16 to 93).

Conclusion: Pediatric head/neck melanomas undergoing WLE were likelier to have narrow margins <2 cm and less likely to meet NCCN criteria. Narrow margins may achieve excellent results for pediatric melanoma patients.

Type of study: This is a treatment study.

Levels of evidence: This is a Level III retrospective comparative study.

小儿黑色素瘤局部大范围切除术中手术边缘的影响--主张采用更保守的方法。
背景:小儿黑色素瘤是儿童最常见的皮肤癌。要达到美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)推荐的宽局部切除术(WLE)的手术切缘,对于体域较小的儿童来说具有挑战性。本研究调查了手术切缘是否会影响儿童和青少年黑色素瘤WLE术后的临床结果:方法:对 2007 年至 2023 年间所有接受 WLE 的 21 岁以下患者进行分析。结果:在纳入的59名患者中,61%的患者术后出现了不良反应:在纳入的 59 例患者中,61% 的患者接受了有结论的 WLE:接受WLE的小儿头颈部黑色素瘤边缘较窄:这是一项治疗研究:本研究为三级回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信