Myoclonus After Cardiac Arrest did not Correlate with Cortical Response on Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Adriana Y Koek, Kyle A Darpel, Temenuzhka Mihaylova, Wesley T Kerr
{"title":"Myoclonus After Cardiac Arrest did not Correlate with Cortical Response on Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.","authors":"Adriana Y Koek, Kyle A Darpel, Temenuzhka Mihaylova, Wesley T Kerr","doi":"10.1177/08850666241287154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Myoclonus after anoxic brain injury is a marker of significant cerebral injury. Absent cortical signal (N20) on somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) after cardiac arrest is a reliable predictor of poor neurological recovery when combined with an overall clinical picture consistent with severe widespread neurological injury. We evaluated a clinical question of if SSEP result could be predicted from other clinical and neurodiagnostic testing results in patients with post-anoxic myoclonus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of all adult patients with post-cardiac arrest myoclonus who underwent both electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring and SSEPs for neuroprognostication. Myoclonus was categorized as \"non-myoclonic movements,\" \"myoclonus not captured on EEG,\" \"myoclonus without EEG correlate,\" \"myoclonus with EEG correlate,\" and \"status myoclonus.\" SSEP results were categorized as all absent, all present, N18 and N20 absent bilaterally, and N20 only absent bilaterally. Cox proportional hazards with censoring was used to evaluate the association of myoclonus category, SSEP results, and confounding factors with survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 56 patients, median time from arrest to either confirmed death or last follow up was 9 days. The category of myoclonus was not associated with SSEP result or length of survival. Absence of N20 s or N18 s was associated with shorter survival (N20 hazard ratio [HR] 4.4, p = 0.0014; N18 HR 5.5, p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Category of myoclonus did not reliably predict SSEP result. SSEP result was correlated with outcome consistently, but goals of care transitioned to comfort measures only in all patients with present peripheral potentials and either absent N20 s only or absence of N18 s and N20 s. Our results suggest that SSEPs may retain prognostic value in patients with post-anoxic myoclonus.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241287154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Myoclonus after anoxic brain injury is a marker of significant cerebral injury. Absent cortical signal (N20) on somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) after cardiac arrest is a reliable predictor of poor neurological recovery when combined with an overall clinical picture consistent with severe widespread neurological injury. We evaluated a clinical question of if SSEP result could be predicted from other clinical and neurodiagnostic testing results in patients with post-anoxic myoclonus.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of all adult patients with post-cardiac arrest myoclonus who underwent both electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring and SSEPs for neuroprognostication. Myoclonus was categorized as "non-myoclonic movements," "myoclonus not captured on EEG," "myoclonus without EEG correlate," "myoclonus with EEG correlate," and "status myoclonus." SSEP results were categorized as all absent, all present, N18 and N20 absent bilaterally, and N20 only absent bilaterally. Cox proportional hazards with censoring was used to evaluate the association of myoclonus category, SSEP results, and confounding factors with survival.

Results: In 56 patients, median time from arrest to either confirmed death or last follow up was 9 days. The category of myoclonus was not associated with SSEP result or length of survival. Absence of N20 s or N18 s was associated with shorter survival (N20 hazard ratio [HR] 4.4, p = 0.0014; N18 HR 5.5, p < 0.00001).

Conclusions: Category of myoclonus did not reliably predict SSEP result. SSEP result was correlated with outcome consistently, but goals of care transitioned to comfort measures only in all patients with present peripheral potentials and either absent N20 s only or absence of N18 s and N20 s. Our results suggest that SSEPs may retain prognostic value in patients with post-anoxic myoclonus.

心脏骤停后肌阵挛与体感诱发电位的皮层反应无关
目的:缺氧性脑损伤后肌阵挛是严重脑损伤的标志。心脏骤停后的体感诱发电位(SSEP)上没有皮层信号(N20),如果与严重广泛神经损伤的整体临床表现一致,则是神经系统恢复不良的可靠预测指标。我们评估了一个临床问题,即缺氧后肌阵挛患者的 SSEP 结果是否可以从其他临床和神经诊断测试结果中预测出来:方法:对所有接受脑电图(EEG)监测和 SSEP 神经诊断的心脏骤停后肌阵挛成人患者进行回顾性病历审查。肌阵挛分为 "非肌阵挛性运动"、"脑电图未捕捉到的肌阵挛"、"无脑电图相关性的肌阵挛"、"有脑电图相关性的肌阵挛 "和 "状态性肌阵挛"。SSEP 结果分为全部缺失、全部存在、N18 和 N20 双侧缺失以及仅 N20 双侧缺失。采用带删减的 Cox 比例危险度法评估肌阵挛类别、SSEP 结果和混杂因素与存活率的关系:在 56 名患者中,从心跳骤停到确诊死亡或最后一次随访的中位时间为 9 天。肌阵挛类别与 SSEP 结果或存活时间无关。无 N20 s 或 N18 s 与存活期缩短有关(N20 危险比 [HR] 4.4,p = 0.0014;N18 危险比 5.5,p 结论:肌阵挛类别与存活期无关:肌阵挛的类别并不能可靠地预测 SSEP 的结果。SSEP 结果与预后的相关性是一致的,但只有在所有存在外周电位且仅缺失 N20 s 或缺失 N18 s 和 N20 s 的患者中,护理目标才会过渡到舒适措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信