Antiseizure Medications and Cardiovascular Events in Older People With Epilepsy.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jimmy Li, Nathan A Shlobin, Roland D Thijs, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Colin B Josephson, Charles Deacon, Mark R Keezer
{"title":"Antiseizure Medications and Cardiovascular Events in Older People With Epilepsy.","authors":"Jimmy Li, Nathan A Shlobin, Roland D Thijs, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Colin B Josephson, Charles Deacon, Mark R Keezer","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>How epilepsy may promote cardiovascular disease remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the odds of new-onset cardiovascular events (CVEs) over 6 years in older people with vs without epilepsy, exploring how enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) and traditional cardiovascular risk factors mediate these odds.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study using the comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), with 6 years of follow-up (2015-2021, analysis performed in December 2023). The CLSA is an ongoing, national study of 51 338 adults aged 45 to 85 years at baseline who are recruited in Canada. The comprehensive cohort includes 30 097 individuals living near 1 of 11 data collection centers. Participation in the CLSA was voluntary; participation rate was 45%. Among those in the comprehensive cohort, individuals reporting no previous history of CVEs (ie, stroke, transient ischemic attack [TIA], or myocardial infarction [MI]) at baseline were excluded. No other exclusion criteria were applied. A total of 86% of participants completed follow-up.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Lifetime history of epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was new-onset CVEs over 6 years. Secondary outcomes were new-onset strokes, TIAs, and MIs. Logistic models were fitted for these outcomes as a function of epilepsy, age, sex, household income, and education level. Mediation analyses were conducted for strong EIASM use, weak EIASM use, Framingham score, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) score, and waist to hip ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 30 097 individuals in the comprehensive cohort, a total of 27 230 individuals (mean [SD] age, 62.3 [10.1] years; 14 268 female [52.4%]) were included, 431 with a lifetime history of epilepsy. New-onset CVEs were more likely in epilepsy, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.20 (95% CI, 1.48-3.27). The proportion of the effect of epilepsy on new-onset CVEs was mediated as follows by each of the following variables: strong EIASM use, 24.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-54.6%), weak EIASM use, 4.0% (95% CI, 0.8%-11.0%), Framingham score, 1.4% (95% CI, -1.6% to 4.5%), PASE score, 3.3% (95% CI, 1.4%-6.8%), and waist to hip ratio, 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this cohort study reveal that epilepsy was associated with new-onset CVEs. Nearly one-third of this association can be explained by EIASMs. These findings should be considered when choosing an antiseizure medication for a person at risk for cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: How epilepsy may promote cardiovascular disease remains poorly understood.

Objective: To estimate the odds of new-onset cardiovascular events (CVEs) over 6 years in older people with vs without epilepsy, exploring how enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) and traditional cardiovascular risk factors mediate these odds.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a prospective cohort study using the comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), with 6 years of follow-up (2015-2021, analysis performed in December 2023). The CLSA is an ongoing, national study of 51 338 adults aged 45 to 85 years at baseline who are recruited in Canada. The comprehensive cohort includes 30 097 individuals living near 1 of 11 data collection centers. Participation in the CLSA was voluntary; participation rate was 45%. Among those in the comprehensive cohort, individuals reporting no previous history of CVEs (ie, stroke, transient ischemic attack [TIA], or myocardial infarction [MI]) at baseline were excluded. No other exclusion criteria were applied. A total of 86% of participants completed follow-up.

Exposure: Lifetime history of epilepsy.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was new-onset CVEs over 6 years. Secondary outcomes were new-onset strokes, TIAs, and MIs. Logistic models were fitted for these outcomes as a function of epilepsy, age, sex, household income, and education level. Mediation analyses were conducted for strong EIASM use, weak EIASM use, Framingham score, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) score, and waist to hip ratio.

Results: Among the 30 097 individuals in the comprehensive cohort, a total of 27 230 individuals (mean [SD] age, 62.3 [10.1] years; 14 268 female [52.4%]) were included, 431 with a lifetime history of epilepsy. New-onset CVEs were more likely in epilepsy, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.20 (95% CI, 1.48-3.27). The proportion of the effect of epilepsy on new-onset CVEs was mediated as follows by each of the following variables: strong EIASM use, 24.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-54.6%), weak EIASM use, 4.0% (95% CI, 0.8%-11.0%), Framingham score, 1.4% (95% CI, -1.6% to 4.5%), PASE score, 3.3% (95% CI, 1.4%-6.8%), and waist to hip ratio, 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.7%).

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this cohort study reveal that epilepsy was associated with new-onset CVEs. Nearly one-third of this association can be explained by EIASMs. These findings should be considered when choosing an antiseizure medication for a person at risk for cardiovascular disease.

抗癫痫药物与老年癫痫患者的心血管事件。
重要性:人们对癫痫如何诱发心血管疾病仍知之甚少:估算患有癫痫与未患有癫痫的老年人在6年内新发心血管事件(CVEs)的几率,探讨酶诱导抗癫痫药物(EIASMs)和传统心血管风险因素如何介导这些几率:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,使用的是加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)的综合队列,随访时间为 6 年(2015-2021 年,分析于 2023 年 12 月进行)。加拿大老龄问题纵向研究是一项正在进行的全国性研究,研究对象是在加拿大招募的基线年龄在 45 至 85 岁之间的 51 338 名成年人。综合队列包括 30 097 名居住在 11 个数据收集中心之一附近的人。CLSA的参与是自愿的,参与率为45%。在综合队列中,基线时无 CVEs(即中风、短暂性脑缺血发作或心肌梗死)病史的个体被排除在外。没有采用其他排除标准。共有 86% 的参与者完成了随访:暴露:终生癫痫史:主要结果是6年内新发的CVE。次要结果为新发脑卒中、TIA 和心肌梗死。将这些结果与癫痫、年龄、性别、家庭收入和教育水平进行逻辑模型拟合。对强 EIASM 使用情况、弱 EIASM 使用情况、弗雷明汉评分、老年人体力活动量表 (PASE) 评分和腰臀比进行了中介分析:在综合队列的 30 097 人中,共有 27 230 人(平均 [SD] 年龄为 62.3 [10.1] 岁;14 268 人为女性 [52.4%]),其中 431 人终生有癫痫病史。癫痫患者更容易新发 CVE,调整后的几率比为 2.20(95% CI,1.48-3.27)。癫痫对新发 CVEs 的影响比例由以下各变量介导:强烈使用 EIASM 的比例为 24.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-54.6%), 弱使用 EIASM 的比例为 4.0%(95% CI,0.8%-11.0%)、Framingham 评分 1.4%(95% CI,-1.6%-4.5%)、PASE 评分 3.3%(95% CI,1.4%-6.8%)、腰臀比 1.6%(95% CI,0.4%-3.7%):这项队列研究的结果显示,癫痫与新发 CVEs 有关。近三分之一的相关性可由 EIASMs 解释。在为有心血管疾病风险的人选择抗癫痫药物时,应考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信