Investigation of the optimal method of oxygen administration with simultaneous use of a surgical mask in postoperative patients: a randomized cross-over study.

Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1186/s40981-024-00741-0
Aya Kamiyama, Tomonori Takazawa, Yusuke Matsui, Kazuhiro Nagumo, Seiji Arai, Shigeru Saito
{"title":"Investigation of the optimal method of oxygen administration with simultaneous use of a surgical mask in postoperative patients: a randomized cross-over study.","authors":"Aya Kamiyama, Tomonori Takazawa, Yusuke Matsui, Kazuhiro Nagumo, Seiji Arai, Shigeru Saito","doi":"10.1186/s40981-024-00741-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>From the standpoint of infection prevention, anesthesiologists need to simultaneously use a surgical mask and an oxygen mask when administering oxygen to patients. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence to justify this method. We aimed to investigate a suitable method of oxygen administration when using a surgical mask in postoperative patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study involving 42 patients admitted to the ICU. We compared three methods of oxygen administration: nasal cannula under the surgical mask, oxygen mask under the surgical mask, and oxygen mask above the surgical mask, using a cross-over design. The primary endpoint was partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>). The secondary endpoint was partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PaO<sub>2</sub> was higher when the oxygen mask was placed under the surgical mask (median values 197.7 mmHg), the nasal cannula was under the surgical mask (180.6 mmHg), and the oxygen mask was above the surgical mask (143.0 mmHg), in descending order, with significant differences between all groups (P < 0.001). PaCO<sub>2</sub> did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current standard method of administering oxygen to postoperative patients using an oxygen mask over a surgical mask results in poor oxygenation. Adopting the method of oxygen administration under the surgical mask via an oxygen mask or nasal cannula should be considered instead.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-024-00741-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: From the standpoint of infection prevention, anesthesiologists need to simultaneously use a surgical mask and an oxygen mask when administering oxygen to patients. However, there is a lack of scientific evidence to justify this method. We aimed to investigate a suitable method of oxygen administration when using a surgical mask in postoperative patients.

Methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study involving 42 patients admitted to the ICU. We compared three methods of oxygen administration: nasal cannula under the surgical mask, oxygen mask under the surgical mask, and oxygen mask above the surgical mask, using a cross-over design. The primary endpoint was partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2). The secondary endpoint was partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2).

Results: PaO2 was higher when the oxygen mask was placed under the surgical mask (median values 197.7 mmHg), the nasal cannula was under the surgical mask (180.6 mmHg), and the oxygen mask was above the surgical mask (143.0 mmHg), in descending order, with significant differences between all groups (P < 0.001). PaCO2 did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: The current standard method of administering oxygen to postoperative patients using an oxygen mask over a surgical mask results in poor oxygenation. Adopting the method of oxygen administration under the surgical mask via an oxygen mask or nasal cannula should be considered instead.

分享
查看原文
术后患者同时使用手术面罩的最佳给氧方法研究:一项随机交叉研究。
背景:从预防感染的角度来看,麻醉医师在为患者供氧时需要同时使用手术面罩和氧气面罩。然而,这种方法缺乏科学依据。我们旨在研究术后患者使用手术面罩时的合适给氧方法:这是一项随机、单盲、交叉研究,涉及 42 名入住重症监护室的患者。我们采用交叉设计比较了三种给氧方法:手术面罩下的鼻插管、手术面罩下的氧气面罩和手术面罩上方的氧气面罩。主要终点是动脉血氧分压(PaO2)。次要终点是动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2):结果:当氧气面罩置于手术面罩下方(中位值为 197.7 mmHg)、鼻插管置于手术面罩下方(180.6 mmHg)和氧气面罩高于手术面罩(143.0 mmHg)时,PaO2 依次升高,各组之间差异显著(P 2 在组间无差异):结论:目前在手术面罩上方使用氧气面罩为术后患者供氧的标准方法会导致氧合不良。应考虑改用手术面罩下通过氧气面罩或鼻插管给氧的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信