Newly established borderline resectable 1 (BR1) category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting the use of multidisciplinary combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapy
{"title":"Newly established borderline resectable 1 (BR1) category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting the use of multidisciplinary combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapy","authors":"Yusuke Kawamura, Norio Akuta, Junichi Shindoh, Masaru Matsumura, Satoshi Okubo, Licht Tominaga, Shigeki Yamamoto, Yasuka Eriksson, Tetsuya Hosaka, Satoshi Saitoh, Hitomi Sezaki, Fumitaka Suzuki, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Kenji Ikeda, Yasuji Arase, Masaji Hashimoto, Takuyo Kozuka, Hiromitsu Kumada","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the newly established oncological criteria of resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for selecting suitable candidates for systemic and combination therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The data of 156 consecutive HCC patients with intrahepatic target nodules who had initially received systemic therapy (lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab) were reviewed. The patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2). The prognostic ability and clinical utility for selecting this population to receive combined use of multiple systemic sequential and locoregional therapy was then evaluated. Combined use of systemic sequential therapy with more than two agents and locoregional treatment was defined as multidisciplinary combination therapy (MCT), while systemic sequential therapy only and repeated locoregional treatment was defined as a single treatment procedure (STP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients classified as R and BR1 had significantly better overall survival (OS) compared with BR2 (R vs. BR2, <i>p</i> = 0.012; BR1 vs. BR2, <i>p</i> = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference between R and BR1 (<i>p</i> = 1.000), in spite of significantly worse oncological status in the BR1 patients. Following a R0 resection and MCT, the BR1 patients had significantly better OS compared with those receiving STP or no additional treatment (median OS, not reached vs. 25.2 months and 20.1 vs. 11.3 months, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.034).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with advanced HCC with intrahepatic target nodules the BR1 category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting those to be treated with MCT strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":"55 2","pages":"275-282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hepr.14114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate the newly established oncological criteria of resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for selecting suitable candidates for systemic and combination therapy.
Methods
The data of 156 consecutive HCC patients with intrahepatic target nodules who had initially received systemic therapy (lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab) were reviewed. The patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2). The prognostic ability and clinical utility for selecting this population to receive combined use of multiple systemic sequential and locoregional therapy was then evaluated. Combined use of systemic sequential therapy with more than two agents and locoregional treatment was defined as multidisciplinary combination therapy (MCT), while systemic sequential therapy only and repeated locoregional treatment was defined as a single treatment procedure (STP).
Results
Patients classified as R and BR1 had significantly better overall survival (OS) compared with BR2 (R vs. BR2, p = 0.012; BR1 vs. BR2, p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference between R and BR1 (p = 1.000), in spite of significantly worse oncological status in the BR1 patients. Following a R0 resection and MCT, the BR1 patients had significantly better OS compared with those receiving STP or no additional treatment (median OS, not reached vs. 25.2 months and 20.1 vs. 11.3 months, respectively; p = 0.034).
Conclusions
In patients with advanced HCC with intrahepatic target nodules the BR1 category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting those to be treated with MCT strategies.
期刊介绍:
Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.