Newly established borderline resectable 1 (BR1) category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting the use of multidisciplinary combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapy

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yusuke Kawamura, Norio Akuta, Junichi Shindoh, Masaru Matsumura, Satoshi Okubo, Licht Tominaga, Shigeki Yamamoto, Yasuka Eriksson, Tetsuya Hosaka, Satoshi Saitoh, Hitomi Sezaki, Fumitaka Suzuki, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Kenji Ikeda, Yasuji Arase, Masaji Hashimoto, Takuyo Kozuka, Hiromitsu Kumada
{"title":"Newly established borderline resectable 1 (BR1) category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting the use of multidisciplinary combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with systemic therapy","authors":"Yusuke Kawamura,&nbsp;Norio Akuta,&nbsp;Junichi Shindoh,&nbsp;Masaru Matsumura,&nbsp;Satoshi Okubo,&nbsp;Licht Tominaga,&nbsp;Shigeki Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yasuka Eriksson,&nbsp;Tetsuya Hosaka,&nbsp;Satoshi Saitoh,&nbsp;Hitomi Sezaki,&nbsp;Fumitaka Suzuki,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Suzuki,&nbsp;Kenji Ikeda,&nbsp;Yasuji Arase,&nbsp;Masaji Hashimoto,&nbsp;Takuyo Kozuka,&nbsp;Hiromitsu Kumada","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the newly established oncological criteria of resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for selecting suitable candidates for systemic and combination therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The data of 156 consecutive HCC patients with intrahepatic target nodules who had initially received systemic therapy (lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab) were reviewed. The patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2). The prognostic ability and clinical utility for selecting this population to receive combined use of multiple systemic sequential and locoregional therapy was then evaluated. Combined use of systemic sequential therapy with more than two agents and locoregional treatment was defined as multidisciplinary combination therapy (MCT), while systemic sequential therapy only and repeated locoregional treatment was defined as a single treatment procedure (STP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients classified as R and BR1 had significantly better overall survival (OS) compared with BR2 (R vs. BR2, <i>p</i> = 0.012; BR1 vs. BR2, <i>p</i> = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference between R and BR1 (<i>p</i> = 1.000), in spite of significantly worse oncological status in the BR1 patients. Following a R0 resection and MCT, the BR1 patients had significantly better OS compared with those receiving STP or no additional treatment (median OS, not reached vs. 25.2 months and 20.1 vs. 11.3 months, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.034).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with advanced HCC with intrahepatic target nodules the BR1 category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting those to be treated with MCT strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":"55 2","pages":"275-282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hepr.14114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the newly established oncological criteria of resectability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for selecting suitable candidates for systemic and combination therapy.

Methods

The data of 156 consecutive HCC patients with intrahepatic target nodules who had initially received systemic therapy (lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab) were reviewed. The patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2). The prognostic ability and clinical utility for selecting this population to receive combined use of multiple systemic sequential and locoregional therapy was then evaluated. Combined use of systemic sequential therapy with more than two agents and locoregional treatment was defined as multidisciplinary combination therapy (MCT), while systemic sequential therapy only and repeated locoregional treatment was defined as a single treatment procedure (STP).

Results

Patients classified as R and BR1 had significantly better overall survival (OS) compared with BR2 (R vs. BR2, p = 0.012; BR1 vs. BR2, p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference between R and BR1 (p = 1.000), in spite of significantly worse oncological status in the BR1 patients. Following a R0 resection and MCT, the BR1 patients had significantly better OS compared with those receiving STP or no additional treatment (median OS, not reached vs. 25.2 months and 20.1 vs. 11.3 months, respectively; p = 0.034).

Conclusions

In patients with advanced HCC with intrahepatic target nodules the BR1 category is one of the favorable candidates for selecting those to be treated with MCT strategies.

Abstract Image

对于接受全身治疗的晚期肝细胞癌患者,新确立的边界可切除1(BR1)类别是选择使用多学科综合疗法的有利候选者之一。
背景:本研究旨在评估新制定的肝细胞癌(HCC)可切除性肿瘤学标准,以选择合适的全身治疗和综合治疗候选者:本研究旨在评估新建立的肝细胞癌(HCC)可切除性肿瘤学标准,以选择适合接受全身治疗和联合治疗的患者:研究回顾了156例连续肝内靶结节HCC患者的数据,这些患者最初接受了全身治疗(来伐替尼和阿替珠单抗加贝伐单抗)。根据新的可切除性肿瘤学标准将患者分为三组(R,可切除;BR1,边缘可切除1;BR2,边缘可切除2)。然后评估了选择这类人群接受多种系统性序贯疗法和局部区域疗法联合治疗的预后能力和临床实用性。联合使用两种以上药物的全身序贯疗法和局部治疗被定义为多学科综合疗法(MCT),而仅使用全身序贯疗法和重复局部治疗被定义为单一治疗程序(STP):结果:与BR2相比,被分类为R和BR1的患者总生存期(OS)明显更好(R vs. BR2,p = 0.012;BR1 vs. BR2,p = 0.004)。然而,尽管BR1患者的肿瘤状态明显更差,但R和BR1之间没有明显差异(p = 1.000)。在接受R0切除术和MCT治疗后,BR1患者的OS明显优于接受STP或未接受额外治疗的患者(中位OS分别为25.2个月未达和20.1个月对11.3个月;p = 0.034):结论:在肝内靶结节的晚期HCC患者中,BR1类别是选择MCT治疗策略的有利候选者之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology Research
Hepatology Research 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
124
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信