Assessing Patient Satisfaction and the Need for Collaborative Treatment with Korean and Western Medicine.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Soyong Park, Yoonju Lee, Linae Kim, Shiva Raj Acharya, NamKwen Kim
{"title":"Assessing Patient Satisfaction and the Need for Collaborative Treatment with Korean and Western Medicine.","authors":"Soyong Park, Yoonju Lee, Linae Kim, Shiva Raj Acharya, NamKwen Kim","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12181901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The collaborative treatment of Korean medicine (KM) and Western medicine (WM) in Korea has gained prominence since its initiation. However, comprehensive evaluations of patient satisfaction and care effectiveness remain limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and the need for collaborative KM-WM treatment in the fourth phase of the national pilot project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter survey was conducted among 321 patients from 15 institutions participating in the fourth phase of the collaborative KM-WM pilot project, spanning from 1 August 2023 to 31 October 2023. Patient satisfaction and needs were assessed using a validated, semi-structured questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical multiple regression were used in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall satisfaction with collaborative KM-WM treatment was notably high (91.25%). Among the participants, 91.58% indicated the necessity of the collaborative KM-WM pilot project, whereas 90.66% pointed out the need to incorporate inpatient services into collaborative care. Expansion of the pilot project to additional institutions and primary healthcare settings was substantially demanded (85.36% and 80.06%, respectively). Treatment effects (<i>β</i>, 0.344; 95% CI: 0.237-0.451), appropriate treatment time (<i>β</i>, 0.140; 95% CI: 0.051-0.229), medical procedural efficiency (<i>β</i>, 0.227; 95% CI: 0.126-0.328), and promotional activities (<i>β</i>, 0.175; 95% CI: 0.101-0.250) significantly contributed to overall patient satisfaction (each, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fourth phase of the KM-WM project reflects high patient satisfaction and a substantial need for collaborative treatment. Further research should include longitudinal studies and employ mixed-methods approaches to better understand, evaluate, and improve collaborative KM-WM treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11431174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The collaborative treatment of Korean medicine (KM) and Western medicine (WM) in Korea has gained prominence since its initiation. However, comprehensive evaluations of patient satisfaction and care effectiveness remain limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and the need for collaborative KM-WM treatment in the fourth phase of the national pilot project.

Methods: A multicenter survey was conducted among 321 patients from 15 institutions participating in the fourth phase of the collaborative KM-WM pilot project, spanning from 1 August 2023 to 31 October 2023. Patient satisfaction and needs were assessed using a validated, semi-structured questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical multiple regression were used in the analysis.

Results: The overall satisfaction with collaborative KM-WM treatment was notably high (91.25%). Among the participants, 91.58% indicated the necessity of the collaborative KM-WM pilot project, whereas 90.66% pointed out the need to incorporate inpatient services into collaborative care. Expansion of the pilot project to additional institutions and primary healthcare settings was substantially demanded (85.36% and 80.06%, respectively). Treatment effects (β, 0.344; 95% CI: 0.237-0.451), appropriate treatment time (β, 0.140; 95% CI: 0.051-0.229), medical procedural efficiency (β, 0.227; 95% CI: 0.126-0.328), and promotional activities (β, 0.175; 95% CI: 0.101-0.250) significantly contributed to overall patient satisfaction (each, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The fourth phase of the KM-WM project reflects high patient satisfaction and a substantial need for collaborative treatment. Further research should include longitudinal studies and employ mixed-methods approaches to better understand, evaluate, and improve collaborative KM-WM treatment.

评估患者满意度以及韩医和西医合作治疗的必要性。
背景:在韩国,韩医(KM)和西医(WM)的合作治疗自开始以来就备受瞩目。然而,对患者满意度和护理效果的全面评估仍然有限。因此,本研究旨在评估国家试点项目第四阶段的患者满意度和韩医西药合作治疗的需求:方法:对参与第四阶段知识管理-知识共享合作试点项目(时间跨度为 2023 年 8 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 31 日)的 15 家机构的 321 名患者进行了多中心调查。患者的满意度和需求采用经过验证的半结构式问卷进行评估,问卷采用 5 点李克特量表。分析中使用了描述性统计和分层多元回归方法:患者对 KM-WM 协同治疗的总体满意度非常高(91.25%)。在参与者中,91.58%的人表示有必要开展 KM-WM 协同试点项目,90.66%的人指出有必要将住院服务纳入协同护理。将试点项目扩展到更多机构和基层医疗机构的要求也很强烈(分别为 85.36% 和 80.06%)。治疗效果(β,0.344;95% CI:0.237-0.451)、适当的治疗时间(β,0.140;95% CI:0.051-0.229)、医疗程序效率(β,0.227;95% CI:0.126-0.328)和宣传活动(β,0.175;95% CI:0.101-0.250)显著提高了患者的总体满意度(每项,P < 0.05):KM-WM项目的第四阶段反映出患者的高满意度和对合作治疗的巨大需求。进一步的研究应包括纵向研究并采用混合方法,以更好地了解、评估和改进 KM-WM 协同治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信