Assessing stigma: Health and social worker regard towards working with people using illicit drugs in Athens, Greece.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Cristina Temenos, Aliki Koutlou, Sotiria Kyriakidou, Sofia Galanaki
{"title":"Assessing stigma: Health and social worker regard towards working with people using illicit drugs in Athens, Greece.","authors":"Cristina Temenos, Aliki Koutlou, Sotiria Kyriakidou, Sofia Galanaki","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01091-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and resulting economic austerity, the rise in illicit drug use engendered an increased need for people who use drugs (PWUD) to access medical care, compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. Research shows that perceptions of medical staff towards PWUD facilitate or act as a barrier to accessing health care. This study provides a better understanding of health and social work professionals' perceptions by assessing stigma levels towards PWUD in Athens, Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed-method study. It calculates the stigma score for professionals (n = 60) and the stigma score associated with specific drugs based on the Medical Condition Regard Scale through a quantitative analysis of responses to a semi-structured online survey about attitudes of health and social work professionals towards PWUD. It draws on the qualitative analysis of 12 semi-structured interviews with 16 service managers, providers, and health services advocates working in the charity sector to determine whether perceptions of PWUD affect writing and implementing policy and protocols for services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stigma towards PWUD exists amongst health and social work professionals in Athens. Professionals who have worked with PWUD for longer periods of time, professionals who have had specific training on working with PWUD, and professionals who feel that they have the necessary training to work with PWUD all demonstrated a higher stigma score than those reporting the opposite. Cannabis and opioids were associated with lower stigma scores while shisha had the highest level of stigma associated with it. Finally, professional environments are not conducive to alleviating stigma as the lack of training specific to stigma, the lack of professional supervision, and worker burn-out are key barriers faced by professionals in their everyday practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reducing and eliminating stigma towards PWUD among health and social workers requires immediate action. Measures to be taken include: introducing training programs focused on stigma towards PWUD to healthcare providers, social workers, lawyers, police, the media; increasing professional supervision on field work for health and social workers; introducing low barrier health care and specialist units. Peers and field-focused organisations should meaningfully participate in drug and alcohol policymaking, program development, and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01091-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and resulting economic austerity, the rise in illicit drug use engendered an increased need for people who use drugs (PWUD) to access medical care, compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. Research shows that perceptions of medical staff towards PWUD facilitate or act as a barrier to accessing health care. This study provides a better understanding of health and social work professionals' perceptions by assessing stigma levels towards PWUD in Athens, Greece.

Methods: This is a mixed-method study. It calculates the stigma score for professionals (n = 60) and the stigma score associated with specific drugs based on the Medical Condition Regard Scale through a quantitative analysis of responses to a semi-structured online survey about attitudes of health and social work professionals towards PWUD. It draws on the qualitative analysis of 12 semi-structured interviews with 16 service managers, providers, and health services advocates working in the charity sector to determine whether perceptions of PWUD affect writing and implementing policy and protocols for services.

Results: Stigma towards PWUD exists amongst health and social work professionals in Athens. Professionals who have worked with PWUD for longer periods of time, professionals who have had specific training on working with PWUD, and professionals who feel that they have the necessary training to work with PWUD all demonstrated a higher stigma score than those reporting the opposite. Cannabis and opioids were associated with lower stigma scores while shisha had the highest level of stigma associated with it. Finally, professional environments are not conducive to alleviating stigma as the lack of training specific to stigma, the lack of professional supervision, and worker burn-out are key barriers faced by professionals in their everyday practice.

Conclusions: Reducing and eliminating stigma towards PWUD among health and social workers requires immediate action. Measures to be taken include: introducing training programs focused on stigma towards PWUD to healthcare providers, social workers, lawyers, police, the media; increasing professional supervision on field work for health and social workers; introducing low barrier health care and specialist units. Peers and field-focused organisations should meaningfully participate in drug and alcohol policymaking, program development, and implementation.

评估耻辱感:希腊雅典卫生和社会工作者对与吸毒者合作的看法。
背景:2008 年全球金融危机和由此导致的经济紧缩之后,非法药物使用的增加导致吸毒者(PWUD)对医疗服务的需求增加,COVID-19 的流行更是雪上加霜。研究表明,医务人员对吸毒者的看法会促进或阻碍他们获得医疗服务。本研究通过评估希腊雅典的医务人员和社会工作专业人员对 PWUD 的成见程度,更好地了解他们的看法:这是一项混合方法研究。方法:这是一项混合方法研究,通过对卫生和社会工作专业人员对艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者态度的半结构化在线调查的回复进行定量分析,计算出专业人员(n = 60)的污名化得分,并根据医疗条件关注量表计算出与特定药物相关的污名化得分。报告还借鉴了对 16 名服务管理人员、提供者和慈善机构健康服务倡导者进行的 12 次半结构式访谈的定性分析,以确定对 PWUD 的看法是否会影响服务政策和协议的制定与实施:雅典的卫生和社会工作专业人员对残疾人存在偏见。与艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者共事时间较长的专业人员、接受过与艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者共事的专门培训的专业人员以及认为自己接受过与艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者共事的必要培训的专业人员的耻辱感得分均高于那些报告相反情况的专业人员。大麻和阿片类药物的耻辱感得分较低,而水烟的耻辱感得分最高。最后,专业环境不利于减轻污名化,因为缺乏专门针对污名化的培训、缺乏专业监督以及工作人员倦怠是专业人员在日常工作中面临的主要障碍:减少和消除卫生和社会工作者对残疾人的成见需要立即采取行动。应采取的措施包括:为医疗服务提供者、社会工作者、律师、警察和媒体提供以污名化为重点的培训计划;加强对医疗工作者和社会工作者现场工作的专业监督;引入低障碍医疗保健和专科部门。同龄人和以实地工作为重点的组织应切实参与毒品和酗酒问题的决策、计划制定和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信