The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hsuan-Kan Chang, Chih-Chang Chang, Yu-Wen Cheng, Ching-Lan Wu, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Jau-Ching Wu, Wen-Cheng Huang
{"title":"The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization.","authors":"Hsuan-Kan Chang, Chih-Chang Chang, Yu-Wen Cheng, Ching-Lan Wu, Tsung-Hsi Tu, Jau-Ching Wu, Wen-Cheng Huang","doi":"10.1177/21925682241290747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective series.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Screw loosening in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease is a major complication of osteopenia or osteoporosis. This study investigated the risk of screw loosening following either MIS-TLIF or pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization (DS) in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled patients receiving 1- or 2-level MIS-TLIF or DS in a single institute. All patients were diagnosed as having lumbar spondylosis without concurrent spondylolisthesis and found by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to have osteopenia or osteoporosis. Screw loosening was identified by X-ray and CT. Clinical outcomes were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients (50 MIS-TLIF and 53 DS) were confirmed to have osteopenia (-2.5<T-score < -1.0) or osteoporosis (T-score≦-2.5). The two groups, which were followed for 33.6 ± 24.7 and 52 ± 34.5 months, had similar T-scores (-1.97 ± 0.7 and -1.97 ± 0.6, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.960). While both groups had significant improvements in back and leg pain assessed by VAS, ODI, and JOA scores, there was a significant difference in overall screw loosening rates between the MIS-TLIF and DS groups analyzed by percent of patients 38% and 18.9% (<i>P</i> = 0.039*) and by percent of screws 16.9% and 8% (<i>P</i> = 0.002*), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in screw loosening rate in osteopenia patients (<i>P</i> = 0.039* by person; <i>P</i> = 0.002* by screw), but no difference in osteoporosis patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The screw loosening rate was higher in the MIS-TLIF group in the entire cohort. Osteopenia patients receiving MIS-TLIF were at significantly higher risk of screw loosening, while that risk was not different for osteoporosis patients, compared to DS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241290747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective series.

Objective: Screw loosening in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease is a major complication of osteopenia or osteoporosis. This study investigated the risk of screw loosening following either MIS-TLIF or pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization (DS) in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients receiving 1- or 2-level MIS-TLIF or DS in a single institute. All patients were diagnosed as having lumbar spondylosis without concurrent spondylolisthesis and found by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to have osteopenia or osteoporosis. Screw loosening was identified by X-ray and CT. Clinical outcomes were also assessed.

Results: A total of 103 patients (50 MIS-TLIF and 53 DS) were confirmed to have osteopenia (-2.5P = 0.960). While both groups had significant improvements in back and leg pain assessed by VAS, ODI, and JOA scores, there was a significant difference in overall screw loosening rates between the MIS-TLIF and DS groups analyzed by percent of patients 38% and 18.9% (P = 0.039*) and by percent of screws 16.9% and 8% (P = 0.002*), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in screw loosening rate in osteopenia patients (P = 0.039* by person; P = 0.002* by screw), but no difference in osteoporosis patients.

Conclusion: The screw loosening rate was higher in the MIS-TLIF group in the entire cohort. Osteopenia patients receiving MIS-TLIF were at significantly higher risk of screw loosening, while that risk was not different for osteoporosis patients, compared to DS.

骨质疏松和骨质疏松症对 MIS-TLIF 和动态稳定中螺钉松动的影响
研究设计回顾性系列研究:腰椎疾病手术治疗中的螺钉松动是骨质增生或骨质疏松症的主要并发症。本研究调查了骨质增生或骨质疏松症患者在接受 MIS-TLIF 或基于椎弓根螺钉的动态稳定(DS)术后发生螺钉松动的风险:方法:我们回顾性地纳入了在一家研究所接受1或2级MIS-TLIF或DS的患者。所有患者均被诊断为腰椎病,但未同时患有脊柱滑脱症,且经双能 X 光吸收测定发现患有骨质增生或骨质疏松症。X光和CT检查发现螺钉松动。此外,还对临床结果进行了评估:共有 103 例患者(50 例 MIS-TLIF 和 53 例 DS)被证实患有骨质疏松症(-2.5P = 0.960)。根据 VAS、ODI 和 JOA 评分评估,两组患者的背部和腿部疼痛均有明显改善,但根据患者百分比分析,MIS-TLIF 组和 DS 组的总体螺钉松动率存在显著差异,分别为 38% 和 18.9% (P = 0.039*),根据螺钉百分比分析,分别为 16.9% 和 8% (P = 0.002*)。亚组分析显示,骨质疏松症患者的螺钉松动率存在显著差异(按人计算,P = 0.039*;按螺钉计算,P = 0.002*),但骨质疏松症患者的螺钉松动率没有差异:结论:在整个队列中,MIS-TLIF组的螺钉松动率较高。结论:在整个队列中,MIS-TLIF 组的螺钉松动率更高,接受 MIS-TLIF 的骨质疏松患者的螺钉松动风险明显更高,而骨质疏松症患者的螺钉松动风险与 DS 相比没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信