Racial Differences in Respiratory Morbidity in Late Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Global Pediatric Health Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2333794X241273151
Theodore Dassios, Allan Jenkinson, Ravindra Bhat, Anne Greenough
{"title":"Racial Differences in Respiratory Morbidity in Late Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Theodore Dassios, Allan Jenkinson, Ravindra Bhat, Anne Greenough","doi":"10.1177/2333794X241273151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. The role of race in late preterm respiratory morbidity has not been adequately described. We aimed to determine whether neonatal respiratory morbidity differs between Black and White late preterm infants. <i>Methods</i>. Single-centre retrospective cohort study at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK of infants born at 34 to <37 weeks of gestational age. The incidence of invasive ventilation was used as the main outcome. <i>Results</i>. In the study period 354 Black and 673 White late preterm infants were admitted. Black, compared to white infants, had a lower incidence of invasive ventilation (19% vs 27%, <i>P</i> < .001) and a lower incidence of non-invasive ventilation (22% vs 34%, <i>P</i> < .001). Black infants had a shorter duration and cost of stay compared to White infants (<i>P</i> = .011 and <0.001 respectively). <i>Conclusion</i>. Black late preterm infants needed less frequently invasive and non-invasive ventilation and had a shorter duration and cost of stay compared to White late preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12576,"journal":{"name":"Global Pediatric Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"2333794X241273151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Pediatric Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X241273151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. The role of race in late preterm respiratory morbidity has not been adequately described. We aimed to determine whether neonatal respiratory morbidity differs between Black and White late preterm infants. Methods. Single-centre retrospective cohort study at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK of infants born at 34 to <37 weeks of gestational age. The incidence of invasive ventilation was used as the main outcome. Results. In the study period 354 Black and 673 White late preterm infants were admitted. Black, compared to white infants, had a lower incidence of invasive ventilation (19% vs 27%, P < .001) and a lower incidence of non-invasive ventilation (22% vs 34%, P < .001). Black infants had a shorter duration and cost of stay compared to White infants (P = .011 and <0.001 respectively). Conclusion. Black late preterm infants needed less frequently invasive and non-invasive ventilation and had a shorter duration and cost of stay compared to White late preterm infants.

早产晚期婴儿呼吸系统发病率的种族差异:回顾性队列研究
目的。种族在晚期早产儿呼吸系统发病率中的作用尚未得到充分描述。我们旨在确定黑人和白人晚期早产儿的新生儿呼吸系统发病率是否存在差异。方法:单中心回顾性队列研究。在英国伦敦国王学院医院 NHS 基金会信托基金会进行的单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为出生日期为 34 到结果为 34 的婴儿。在研究期间,共接收了 354 名黑人和 673 名白人晚期早产儿。与白人婴儿相比,黑人婴儿的侵入性通气发生率较低(19% vs 27%,P P = .011),结论也较低。与白人晚期早产儿相比,黑人晚期早产儿需要侵入性和非侵入性通气的次数更少,住院时间更短,费用更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Pediatric Health
Global Pediatric Health Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信