Raphael Wittenberg, Jacqueline Damant, Amritpal Rehill, Martin Knapp, Tobi Adeyemi, Ian Matthews
{"title":"Estimated value of productivity lost due to childhood chickenpox in the United Kingdom: a survey of parents.","authors":"Raphael Wittenberg, Jacqueline Damant, Amritpal Rehill, Martin Knapp, Tobi Adeyemi, Ian Matthews","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2410257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While medical costs of chickenpox have been researched, little is known about indirect costs. Understanding total costs is important for decisions about vaccination. This study estimated the value of lost productivity of adults missing work to care for children with chickenpox.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>It comprised an international literature review, online survey of 1,526 parents of children aged 1 to 11 years, and computation of indirect costs of chickenpox in the UK. The survey covered chickenpox episodes amongst respondents' children, time children took off school/nursery, and work absenteeism by parents/caregivers caring for them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents reported on 2,283 children, of whom 52% (1185/2283) experienced chickenpox. Almost half (591/1185) missed days of school/nursery, averaging 5.6 days missed. In 260 cases of 542 adults providing data with such a child, an adult missed work to care for the child. The daily value of this lost productivity was £170. There were approximately 200,000 GP consultations for chickenpox and 625,000 births annually, suggesting annual chickenpox incidence lies between these figures. The estimated annual UK productivity loss due to chickenpox is £20 -£70 million ($25-$90 million).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Annual value of lost productivity due to chickenpox is in range £20 to £70 million.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2410257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: While medical costs of chickenpox have been researched, little is known about indirect costs. Understanding total costs is important for decisions about vaccination. This study estimated the value of lost productivity of adults missing work to care for children with chickenpox.
Research design and methods: It comprised an international literature review, online survey of 1,526 parents of children aged 1 to 11 years, and computation of indirect costs of chickenpox in the UK. The survey covered chickenpox episodes amongst respondents' children, time children took off school/nursery, and work absenteeism by parents/caregivers caring for them.
Results: Respondents reported on 2,283 children, of whom 52% (1185/2283) experienced chickenpox. Almost half (591/1185) missed days of school/nursery, averaging 5.6 days missed. In 260 cases of 542 adults providing data with such a child, an adult missed work to care for the child. The daily value of this lost productivity was £170. There were approximately 200,000 GP consultations for chickenpox and 625,000 births annually, suggesting annual chickenpox incidence lies between these figures. The estimated annual UK productivity loss due to chickenpox is £20 -£70 million ($25-$90 million).
Conclusions: Annual value of lost productivity due to chickenpox is in range £20 to £70 million.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.