Preventing Infectious Complications Following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Alternative Approaches to Transrectal Biopsy with Empirical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Therapy.

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Kumar Madhavan, Priyank Bhargava, Amrut Phonde, Sagar Yadav, Sonu Kumar Plash, Puneeth Kumar Kadlepla Mutt, Manupriya Madhavan, Devashish Kaushal, Rahul Jena
{"title":"Preventing Infectious Complications Following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Alternative Approaches to Transrectal Biopsy with Empirical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Therapy.","authors":"Kumar Madhavan, Priyank Bhargava, Amrut Phonde, Sagar Yadav, Sonu Kumar Plash, Puneeth Kumar Kadlepla Mutt, Manupriya Madhavan, Devashish Kaushal, Rahul Jena","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Prostate biopsy, conducted frequently through the transrectal route, is associated with significant risks of infectious complications. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of various strategies to reduce these complications, using a network meta-analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane database as of March 1, 2024. We included studies that involved adults undergoing transrectal or transperineal prostate biopsy with either standard empirical antibiotic prophylaxis or alternative interventions. The primary outcomes were assessment of sepsis, fever, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and readmissions. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024532225).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Our search yielded 28 RCTs eligible for analysis, encompassing a total of 10 179 participants. Rectal cleansing had the highest rankogram score to reduce infectious complications such as sepsis (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval [0.28-0.58]; rankogram, p score = 0.917), followed by transperineal biopsy (p score = 0.496). The overall analysis also highlighted a lower incidence of UTIs and readmissions with this method. Heterogeneity among studies was minimal (I<sup>2</sup> < 50% for all outcomes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Rectal cleansing might be the most effective strategy to reduce infectious complications following transrectal prostate biopsy and could be more effective than rectal culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis and transperineal biopsy. Given the indirect nature of our comparisons, further RCTs are needed to determine the safest approach for prostate biopsy, particularly between transperineal biopsy and transrectal biopsy with rectal cleansing or rectal culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>In this review, we analyzed different techniques to reduce infectious complications after a prostate biopsy. We found that rectal cleansing prior to performing a transrectal prostate biopsy reduced infectious complications and might be the most effective strategy. We conclude that either transperineal or transrectal prostate biopsies are acceptable approaches, albeit with rectal cleansing or rectal culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Prostate biopsy, conducted frequently through the transrectal route, is associated with significant risks of infectious complications. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of various strategies to reduce these complications, using a network meta-analysis approach.

Methods: Our study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane database as of March 1, 2024. We included studies that involved adults undergoing transrectal or transperineal prostate biopsy with either standard empirical antibiotic prophylaxis or alternative interventions. The primary outcomes were assessment of sepsis, fever, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and readmissions. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024532225).

Key findings and limitations: Our search yielded 28 RCTs eligible for analysis, encompassing a total of 10 179 participants. Rectal cleansing had the highest rankogram score to reduce infectious complications such as sepsis (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval [0.28-0.58]; rankogram, p score = 0.917), followed by transperineal biopsy (p score = 0.496). The overall analysis also highlighted a lower incidence of UTIs and readmissions with this method. Heterogeneity among studies was minimal (I2 < 50% for all outcomes).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Rectal cleansing might be the most effective strategy to reduce infectious complications following transrectal prostate biopsy and could be more effective than rectal culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis and transperineal biopsy. Given the indirect nature of our comparisons, further RCTs are needed to determine the safest approach for prostate biopsy, particularly between transperineal biopsy and transrectal biopsy with rectal cleansing or rectal culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis.

Patient summary: In this review, we analyzed different techniques to reduce infectious complications after a prostate biopsy. We found that rectal cleansing prior to performing a transrectal prostate biopsy reduced infectious complications and might be the most effective strategy. We conclude that either transperineal or transrectal prostate biopsies are acceptable approaches, albeit with rectal cleansing or rectal culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis, respectively.

预防前列腺活检术后感染性并发症:经直肠活检术中使用经验性抗生素预防疗法的替代方法随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络 Meta 分析。
背景和目的:前列腺活检经常通过经直肠途径进行,与感染性并发症的巨大风险相关。本研究旨在采用网络荟萃分析方法,比较各种减少并发症策略的效果:我们的研究纳入了截至 2024 年 3 月 1 日从 PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中找到的随机对照试验 (RCT)。我们纳入的研究涉及接受经直肠或经会阴前列腺穿刺活检的成人,采用标准经验性抗生素预防或替代性干预措施。主要结果是对败血症、发热、尿路感染 (UTI) 和再住院的评估。该研究已在PROSPERO(CRD42024532225)注册:我们的搜索结果有 28 项研究符合分析条件,共有 10 179 名参与者。在减少败血症等感染性并发症方面,直肠清洗的排名图得分最高(几率比0.40,95%置信区间[0.28-0.58];排名图,P得分=0.917),其次是经会阴活检(P得分=0.496)。总体分析还显示,这种方法的UTI和再住院发生率较低。各研究之间的异质性极小(I2 结论和临床意义:直肠清洗可能是减少经直肠前列腺活检术后感染并发症的最有效策略,可能比基于直肠培养的抗生素预防和经会阴活检术更有效。鉴于我们的比较具有间接性,因此需要进一步进行 RCT 研究,以确定前列腺活检的最安全方法,尤其是经会阴活检与经直肠活检加直肠清洁或直肠培养抗生素预防之间的区别。我们发现,在进行经直肠前列腺活检前进行直肠清洗可减少感染并发症,可能是最有效的策略。我们的结论是,经会阴或经直肠前列腺活检都是可以接受的方法,尽管要分别进行直肠清洗或直肠培养抗生素预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信