Cardiovascular effects of Roflumilast during sepsis: Risks or benefits?

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"Cardiovascular effects of Roflumilast during sepsis: Risks or benefits?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.177015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) is responsible for terminating cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signalling. PDE4 inhibitors, such as roflumilast (RFM), have anti-inflammatory activity and have been studied in inflammation-induced tissue damage in sepsis. However, the role of RFM on cardiovascular derangements induced by sepsis is still unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the potential effects of RFM on cardiovascular collapse and multiorgan damage caused by sepsis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in male rats. Six hours after the CLP or sham procedure, animals were randomly assigned to receive either RFM (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously, and cardiovascular parameters were assessed 24 h after the surgery and organ/plasma samples were collected for further analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sepsis induced hypotension, tachycardia, reduced renal blood flow (RBF) and hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictors both <em>in vivo</em> and <em>ex vivo</em>. RFM treatment increased systemic cAMP levels and RBF. RFM also attenuated hypoperfusion and liver damage induced by CLP. Furthermore, RFM reduced systemic nitric oxide (NO) levels in septic rats, while there were no changes in hepatic NOS-2 expression. Nevertheless, RFM exacerbated sepsis-induced hypotension and tachycardia without ameliorating vascular hyporeactivity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our data show that PDE-4 inhibition protects septic rats from hepatic injury and improves renal perfusion. However, RFM worsened hemodynamic parameters and showed no protection against sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction and mortality. Thus, despite the anti-inflammatory benefits of RFM, its application in sepsis should be approached cautiously.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12004,"journal":{"name":"European journal of pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014299924007052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) is responsible for terminating cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signalling. PDE4 inhibitors, such as roflumilast (RFM), have anti-inflammatory activity and have been studied in inflammation-induced tissue damage in sepsis. However, the role of RFM on cardiovascular derangements induced by sepsis is still unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the potential effects of RFM on cardiovascular collapse and multiorgan damage caused by sepsis.

Methods

Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in male rats. Six hours after the CLP or sham procedure, animals were randomly assigned to receive either RFM (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously, and cardiovascular parameters were assessed 24 h after the surgery and organ/plasma samples were collected for further analyses.

Results

Sepsis induced hypotension, tachycardia, reduced renal blood flow (RBF) and hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictors both in vivo and ex vivo. RFM treatment increased systemic cAMP levels and RBF. RFM also attenuated hypoperfusion and liver damage induced by CLP. Furthermore, RFM reduced systemic nitric oxide (NO) levels in septic rats, while there were no changes in hepatic NOS-2 expression. Nevertheless, RFM exacerbated sepsis-induced hypotension and tachycardia without ameliorating vascular hyporeactivity.

Conclusion

Our data show that PDE-4 inhibition protects septic rats from hepatic injury and improves renal perfusion. However, RFM worsened hemodynamic parameters and showed no protection against sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction and mortality. Thus, despite the anti-inflammatory benefits of RFM, its application in sepsis should be approached cautiously.
脓毒症期间罗氟司特对心血管的影响:风险还是益处?
背景:磷酸二酯酶-4(PDE4)负责终止环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)信号。PDE4 抑制剂,如罗氟司特(RFM),具有抗炎活性,已被用于研究败血症中炎症诱导的组织损伤。然而,RFM 对脓毒症诱发的心血管失调的作用尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在评估 RFM 对败血症引起的心血管衰竭和多器官损伤的潜在影响:方法:通过盲肠结扎和穿刺(CLP)诱导雄性大鼠发生败血症。手术后 24 小时评估心血管参数,并收集器官/血浆样本进行进一步分析:结果:脓毒症在体内和体外均诱发低血压、心动过速、肾血流量(RBF)减少以及对血管收缩剂的反应性减弱。RFM 治疗可提高全身 cAMP 水平和 RBF。RFM 还可减轻中电解质诱导的低灌注和肝损伤。此外,RFM 降低了脓毒症大鼠全身一氧化氮(NO)的水平,而肝脏 NOS-2 的表达没有变化。然而,RFM 会加剧脓毒症引起的低血压和心动过速,但不会改善血管的低反应性:我们的数据显示,PDE-4 抑制可保护脓毒症大鼠免受肝损伤并改善肾灌注。结论:我们的数据显示,PDE-4 抑制剂可保护脓毒症大鼠免受肝损伤,并改善肾灌注,但 RFM 会使血液动力学参数恶化,对脓毒症诱发的心血管功能障碍和死亡率没有保护作用。因此,尽管 RFM 有抗炎作用,但在脓毒症中应用 RFM 仍需谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
572
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pharmacology publishes research papers covering all aspects of experimental pharmacology with focus on the mechanism of action of structurally identified compounds affecting biological systems. The scope includes: Behavioural pharmacology Neuropharmacology and analgesia Cardiovascular pharmacology Pulmonary, gastrointestinal and urogenital pharmacology Endocrine pharmacology Immunopharmacology and inflammation Molecular and cellular pharmacology Regenerative pharmacology Biologicals and biotherapeutics Translational pharmacology Nutriceutical pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信