Socio-economic inequalities and heart failure morbidity and mortality: A systematic review and data synthesis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Abdul Shakoor, Willemijn A van Maarschalkerwaart, Jeroen Schaap, Rudolf A de Boer, Nicolas M van Mieghem, Eric H Boersma, Loek van Heerebeek, Jasper J Brugts, Robert M A van der Boon
{"title":"Socio-economic inequalities and heart failure morbidity and mortality: A systematic review and data synthesis.","authors":"Abdul Shakoor, Willemijn A van Maarschalkerwaart, Jeroen Schaap, Rudolf A de Boer, Nicolas M van Mieghem, Eric H Boersma, Loek van Heerebeek, Jasper J Brugts, Robert M A van der Boon","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.14986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Socio-economic status (SES) has been associated with incident and prevalent heart failure (HF), as well as its morbidity and mortality. However, the precise nature of the relationship between SES and HF remains unclear due to inconsistent data. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment and data synthesis of the relationship between SES and HF morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic search and data synthesis using six databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines. The included studies comprised observational studies that reported on HF incidence and prevalence, HF hospitalizations, worsening HF (WHF) and all-cause mortality, as well as treatment options (medical, device and advanced HF therapies). SES was measured on both individual and area levels, encompassing single (e.g., income, education, employment, social risk score, living conditions and housing characteristics) and composite indicators. Among the 4124 studies screened, 79 were included, with an additional 5 identified through cross-referencing. In the majority of studies, a low SES was associated with an increased HF incidence (72%) and prevalence (75%). For mortality, we demonstrated that low SES was associated with increased mortality in 45% of the studies, with 18% of the studies showing mixed results (depending on the indicator, gender or follow-up) and 38% showing non-significant results. Similar patterns were observed for the association between SES, WHF, medical therapy prescriptions and the utilization of devices and advanced HF therapies. There was no clear pattern in the used SES indicators and HF outcomes. This systematic review, using contemporary data, shows that while socio-economic disparity may influence HF incidence, management and subsequent adverse events, these associations are not uniformly predictive. Our review highlights that the impact of SES varies depending on the specific indicators used, reflecting the complexity of its influence on health disparities. Assessment and recognition of SES as an important risk factor can assist clinicians in early detection and customizing HF treatment, while also aiding policymakers in optimizing resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socio-economic status (SES) has been associated with incident and prevalent heart failure (HF), as well as its morbidity and mortality. However, the precise nature of the relationship between SES and HF remains unclear due to inconsistent data. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment and data synthesis of the relationship between SES and HF morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic search and data synthesis using six databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines. The included studies comprised observational studies that reported on HF incidence and prevalence, HF hospitalizations, worsening HF (WHF) and all-cause mortality, as well as treatment options (medical, device and advanced HF therapies). SES was measured on both individual and area levels, encompassing single (e.g., income, education, employment, social risk score, living conditions and housing characteristics) and composite indicators. Among the 4124 studies screened, 79 were included, with an additional 5 identified through cross-referencing. In the majority of studies, a low SES was associated with an increased HF incidence (72%) and prevalence (75%). For mortality, we demonstrated that low SES was associated with increased mortality in 45% of the studies, with 18% of the studies showing mixed results (depending on the indicator, gender or follow-up) and 38% showing non-significant results. Similar patterns were observed for the association between SES, WHF, medical therapy prescriptions and the utilization of devices and advanced HF therapies. There was no clear pattern in the used SES indicators and HF outcomes. This systematic review, using contemporary data, shows that while socio-economic disparity may influence HF incidence, management and subsequent adverse events, these associations are not uniformly predictive. Our review highlights that the impact of SES varies depending on the specific indicators used, reflecting the complexity of its influence on health disparities. Assessment and recognition of SES as an important risk factor can assist clinicians in early detection and customizing HF treatment, while also aiding policymakers in optimizing resource allocation.

社会经济不平等与心力衰竭的发病率和死亡率:系统回顾与数据综合。
社会经济地位(SES)与心力衰竭(HF)的发病率和流行率及其发病率和死亡率有关。然而,由于数据不一致,社会经济地位与心力衰竭之间关系的确切性质仍不清楚。本研究旨在对 SES 与心力衰竭发病率和死亡率之间的关系进行全面评估和数据综合。我们按照《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目指南》,使用六个数据库进行了系统检索和数据综合。纳入的研究包括观察性研究,这些研究报告了心房颤动发病率和流行率、心房颤动住院率、心房颤动恶化(WHF)和全因死亡率,以及治疗方案(医疗、设备和先进的心房颤动疗法)。SES从个人和地区两个层面进行衡量,包括单一指标(如收入、教育、就业、社会风险评分、生活条件和住房特征)和综合指标。在筛选出的 4124 项研究中,有 79 项被纳入,另有 5 项是通过相互参照确定的。在大多数研究中,低社会经济地位与高血压发病率(72%)和患病率(75%)的增加有关。在死亡率方面,我们发现 45% 的研究表明低社会经济地位与死亡率增加有关,18% 的研究结果不一(取决于指标、性别或随访情况),38% 的研究结果不显著。SES、WHF、医疗处方以及设备和先进的心房颤动疗法的使用之间的关系也呈现出类似的模式。所使用的 SES 指标与心房颤动结果之间没有明显的模式。本系统性综述利用当代数据显示,虽然社会经济差距可能会影响心房颤动的发病率、管理和后续不良事件,但这些关联并不具有统一的预测性。我们的综述强调,社会经济地位的影响因所使用的具体指标而异,反映了其对健康差异影响的复杂性。评估并认识到社会经济地位是一个重要的风险因素,可以帮助临床医生早期发现和定制心房颤动治疗,同时也有助于政策制定者优化资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信